Recomponer el paisaje: evidenciar y denunciar

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY

Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico Pub Date : 2020-08-21 DOI:10.7764/67.6

Bruno Jara Ahumada

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The investigation states that the landscape was repetitive in the visual testimonies of the Chilean military dictatorship. By landscape it comprises a visual, political and cultural construction, which gives space-reference density to the memory accounts. In this context, we distinguish a struggle of meanings: first, authoritarianism instrumented the landscape to convey the subterranean values and promoted the legitimacy of the regime. At the same time, the resistance generated denotative landscapes, in an accusatory-testimony key, which materialized in endless means. Specifically, a corpus composed of arpilleras and drawings in prison will be examined. Beyond its specificities, we propose that one of the main functions that brings together both sets is its use as a device of evidence and denunciation. Thus, we will try to recompose part of the dissident landscape by weaving together certain images that account for the spatial substrate of the events.

查看原文本刊更多论文

重建景观:证据和谴责

调查表明，在智利军事独裁统治的视觉证词中，这一景观是重复的。通过景观，它包括视觉、政治和文化建筑，这为记忆账户提供了空间参考密度。在这种背景下，我们区分了一种意义的斗争:首先，威权主义利用景观来传达地下价值，并促进政权的合法性。与此同时，这种反抗产生了外延景观，以控诉-证言的方式，以无尽的方式物化。具体而言，将审查由监狱中的弓箭手和绘画组成的语料库。除了它的特殊性之外，我们认为将两者结合在一起的主要功能之一是它作为证据和谴责的工具。因此，我们将尝试通过将某些图像编织在一起来重新组合部分持不同政见的景观，这些图像说明了事件的空间基础。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

40 weeks

期刊介绍： The choice of the name of the journal represents a farewell from the identification of aesthetics with hermeneutics and speculative philosophy of art. It also shows our strong commitment to the irreducibility of aesthetics to a mere psychological fact. The subtitle of the journal “practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics” indicates the present, fertile pluralism of aesthetics. This is a pluralism of views and methods, often connected with the different ways in which contemporary arts and aesthetic abilities present and structure themselves. Also, it is a pluralism of thoughts and formulas, which induces to relativize the western tradition within which the discipline of aesthetics was born. Finally, it is a pluralism of epistemic landscapes, which also trespasses into the sphere of sensibility and art. These various, epistemic landscapes have recently experienced a revolutionary enlargement through the rise of some new or radically renewed disciplines (from neurosciences to anthropology, from cognitive sciences to psychobiology). Indeed, we conceive Aisthesis as a public space where those different approaches and disciplines can interact.