The Second Teacher's Story in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas: A Contribution to the Recent Discussion on the Developmental Interpretation

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1017/S0028688523000073

David Cielontko

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article explains the problematic Second Teacher episode in the so-called developmental interpretation of IGT recently proposed by M. R. Whitenton and J. R. C. Cousland. The article shows that the killing of the second teacher in the text of Gs, which is appropriately identified as problematic for the developmental interpretation, appears to be a later version of the episode that most likely already sought to supplement a more original account. In the earliest recoverable form, preserved in the early versions (Syriac, Latin and Ethiopic), the story consistently does not blame Jesus for the death of the second teacher, either in the episode itself or in the other passages. So in the earliest surviving version(s), the teacher dies but not because of a curse from Jesus. Therefore, this episode does not disturb the so-called developmental interpretation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

《多马婴儿期福音书》中第二个老师的故事:对发展性解释近期讨论的贡献

摘要本文对Whitenton和Cousland最近提出的发展性IGT解释中存在问题的“第二教师”章节进行了解释。这篇文章表明，在g的文本中，第二个老师被杀，这被恰当地认为是发展解释的问题，似乎是这个情节的一个后来的版本，很可能已经试图补充一个更原始的描述。在保存在早期版本(叙利亚文、拉丁文和埃塞俄比亚文)的最早可恢复的形式中，这个故事始终没有因为第二个老师的死而责怪耶稣，无论是在情节本身还是在其他段落中。所以在现存最早的版本中，老师死了，但不是因为耶稣的诅咒。因此，这一插曲并不妨碍所谓的发展性解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

New Testament Studies RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Testament Studies is an international peer-reviewed periodical whose contributors include the leading New Testament scholars writing in the world today. The journal publishes original articles and short studies in English, French and German on a wide range of issues pertaining to the origins, history, context and theology of the New Testament and early Christianity. All contributions represent research at the cutting edge of the discipline, which has developed a wide range of methods. The journal welcomes submissions employing any such methods in recent years. The periodical embraces exegetical, historical, literary-critical, sociological, theological and other approaches to the New Testament, including studies in its history of interpretation and effects.