OCD in animal models using quinpirole as dopaminergic inductor of perseverative behavior

Abraham Flores Vargas
{"title":"OCD in animal models using quinpirole as dopaminergic inductor of perseverative behavior","authors":"Abraham Flores Vargas","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.C1.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"V insufficiency occurs in 4% of flaps raised on the Deep Inferior Epigastric System (DIES), typically in perforator flaps. Computed Tomography Angiogram (CTA) has become a routine part of pre-operative assessment of vascular anatomy and design in these flaps. We aim to identify CTA signs that predict venous congestion. This is a retrospective cohort study of flaps raised on the DIES at our institution where a CTA was performed pre-operatively. 98 consecutive patients had 124 DIES flaps raised of which four (3.2%) developed venous congestion. In these flaps, predictors of venous congestion included a type I pedicle (75 vs. 64.2%, p=0.22), a superficial Inferior Epigastric Vein (SIEV) that did not connect to the depp. system perforations and was larger at origin (5.2 vs. 3.5mm, p=0.007) and less likely to arborise (0 vs. 96.7%, p<0.001), the perforators of congested flaps were less likely to connect to the superficial system (38.1 vs. 88.8%, p<0.001) and an SIEV that was larger in diameter that the DIEV at origin had a correlation coefficient with congestion of 1, suggesting that that a SIEV>DIEV at origin is highly predictive of congestion. We concluded that a CTA is an important pre-operative study for the identification of risk factors for venous compromise. These findings should prompt a robust discussion of the risk of flap failure with patients and contingency planning to augment venous drainage with the superficial system if required.","PeriodicalId":16641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain and Relief","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.C1.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

V insufficiency occurs in 4% of flaps raised on the Deep Inferior Epigastric System (DIES), typically in perforator flaps. Computed Tomography Angiogram (CTA) has become a routine part of pre-operative assessment of vascular anatomy and design in these flaps. We aim to identify CTA signs that predict venous congestion. This is a retrospective cohort study of flaps raised on the DIES at our institution where a CTA was performed pre-operatively. 98 consecutive patients had 124 DIES flaps raised of which four (3.2%) developed venous congestion. In these flaps, predictors of venous congestion included a type I pedicle (75 vs. 64.2%, p=0.22), a superficial Inferior Epigastric Vein (SIEV) that did not connect to the depp. system perforations and was larger at origin (5.2 vs. 3.5mm, p=0.007) and less likely to arborise (0 vs. 96.7%, p<0.001), the perforators of congested flaps were less likely to connect to the superficial system (38.1 vs. 88.8%, p<0.001) and an SIEV that was larger in diameter that the DIEV at origin had a correlation coefficient with congestion of 1, suggesting that that a SIEV>DIEV at origin is highly predictive of congestion. We concluded that a CTA is an important pre-operative study for the identification of risk factors for venous compromise. These findings should prompt a robust discussion of the risk of flap failure with patients and contingency planning to augment venous drainage with the superficial system if required.
使用喹匹罗作为持久行为多巴胺能诱导剂的强迫症动物模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信