PELAKSANAAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB DOKTER JAGA DI INSTALASI GAWAT DARURAT BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA

Rudianto Rudianto
{"title":"PELAKSANAAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB DOKTER JAGA DI INSTALASI GAWAT DARURAT BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA","authors":"Rudianto Rudianto","doi":"10.20884/1.jih.2018.4.2.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service at IGD many find difficult, such as the State of the patient is not conscious and there is no family that takes, so the doctor IGD should get legal protection in the conduct of medical action. The problem occurs because the doctor IGD in conditions like this should serve patients in the shortest – in short with the doctor in the service of the response time of the IGD is less than 5 (five) minutes, in order to save lives and more disability prevention further, while the doctor IGD that is in the RS are currently limited in number. The purpose of research to analyse the implementation of the responsibility of the doctor in dealing with patients at IGD hospital. This type of research is descriptive, the juridical sociological approach is the method. The primary data source as the primary data collected from the field, and secondary data as supporting data. The data obtained were analyzed using qualitative methods, with the constant comparison analysis models and techniques of analysis done with the method of Theoretical Interpretation. Aspects of the implementation of the responsibility of the doctor IGD-positive, however there are doctor IGD substitute that does not have SIP for lack of doctor IGD especially when holiday Lebaran. Doctor who practise without having a SIP don't get legal protection, from the beginning of the Administration had broken the law and may be subject to disciplinary action from the City/County Health Department in addition to criminal sanctions as set forth in Article 76 of ACT No. 29 of the year 2004 about the practice of medicine.","PeriodicalId":31701,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Idea Hukum","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Idea Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2018.4.2.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Service at IGD many find difficult, such as the State of the patient is not conscious and there is no family that takes, so the doctor IGD should get legal protection in the conduct of medical action. The problem occurs because the doctor IGD in conditions like this should serve patients in the shortest – in short with the doctor in the service of the response time of the IGD is less than 5 (five) minutes, in order to save lives and more disability prevention further, while the doctor IGD that is in the RS are currently limited in number. The purpose of research to analyse the implementation of the responsibility of the doctor in dealing with patients at IGD hospital. This type of research is descriptive, the juridical sociological approach is the method. The primary data source as the primary data collected from the field, and secondary data as supporting data. The data obtained were analyzed using qualitative methods, with the constant comparison analysis models and techniques of analysis done with the method of Theoretical Interpretation. Aspects of the implementation of the responsibility of the doctor IGD-positive, however there are doctor IGD substitute that does not have SIP for lack of doctor IGD especially when holiday Lebaran. Doctor who practise without having a SIP don't get legal protection, from the beginning of the Administration had broken the law and may be subject to disciplinary action from the City/County Health Department in addition to criminal sanctions as set forth in Article 76 of ACT No. 29 of the year 2004 about the practice of medicine.
根据印尼积极法律,在急诊室执行保护医生职责的法律保护
在IGD服务中许多人发现困难,如病人的状态不清醒,没有家属,所以医生IGD在进行医疗行动时应该得到法律保护。问题的发生是因为医生IGD在这种情况下应该在最短的时间内为病人服务-简而言之,医生在服务的IGD的反应时间少于5(5)分钟,以挽救生命和进一步预防更多的残疾,而医生IGD在RS目前数量有限。研究的目的是分析IGD医院医生在处理病人时责任的执行情况。这种类型的研究是描述性的,法律社会学的方法是方法。主要数据源作为从现场收集的主要数据,辅助数据作为支持数据。所得数据采用定性方法进行分析,采用理论解释方法进行不断比较分析模型和分析技术。在履行IGD阳性医生的责任方面,却有医生IGD代用,因为缺乏IGD的医生尤其在休假时没有SIP。没有SIP的医生在执业时得不到法律保护,从行政部门一开始就违反了法律,除了根据2004年第29号ACT第76条关于行医的规定进行刑事处罚外,还可能受到市/县卫生部门的纪律处分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信