Causal Inference, Moral Intuition, and Modeling in a Pandemic

S. Harvard, Eric Winsberg
{"title":"Causal Inference, Moral Intuition, and Modeling in a Pandemic","authors":"S. Harvard, Eric Winsberg","doi":"10.5195/philmed.2021.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, people have been eager to learn what factors, and especially what public health policies, cause infection rates to wax and wane. But figuring out conclusively what causes what is difficult in complex systems with nonlinear dynamics, such as pandemics. We review some of the challenges that scientists have faced in answering quantitative causal questions during the Covid-19 pandemic, and suggest that these challenges are a reason to augment the moral dimension of conversations about causal inference. We take a lesson from Martha Nussbaum—who cautions us not to think we have just one question on our hands when we have at least two—and apply it to modeling for causal inference in the context of cost-benefit analysis.","PeriodicalId":82846,"journal":{"name":"Studies in philosophy of medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in philosophy of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/philmed.2021.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, people have been eager to learn what factors, and especially what public health policies, cause infection rates to wax and wane. But figuring out conclusively what causes what is difficult in complex systems with nonlinear dynamics, such as pandemics. We review some of the challenges that scientists have faced in answering quantitative causal questions during the Covid-19 pandemic, and suggest that these challenges are a reason to augment the moral dimension of conversations about causal inference. We take a lesson from Martha Nussbaum—who cautions us not to think we have just one question on our hands when we have at least two—and apply it to modeling for causal inference in the context of cost-benefit analysis.
大流行中的因果推理、道德直觉和建模
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,人们一直渴望了解是什么因素,尤其是什么公共卫生政策,导致感染率上升和下降。但是,在具有非线性动力学的复杂系统中,如流行病中,想要最终弄清楚是什么导致了什么是很困难的。我们回顾了科学家在回答Covid-19大流行期间定量因果问题时面临的一些挑战,并认为这些挑战是增加因果推理对话的道德维度的原因。我们从玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha nussbaum)那里吸取教训——她告诫我们,当我们至少有两个问题时,不要认为我们手头只有一个问题——并将其应用于成本效益分析背景下的因果推理建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书