Clinical usefulness of serum free light chains measurement in patients with multiple myeloma: comparative analysis of two different tests.

IF 0.3
T. Kubicki, D. Dytfeld, A. Baszczuk, E. Wysocka, M. Komarnicki, K. Lewandowski
{"title":"Clinical usefulness of serum free light chains measurement in patients with multiple myeloma: comparative analysis of two different tests.","authors":"T. Kubicki, D. Dytfeld, A. Baszczuk, E. Wysocka, M. Komarnicki, K. Lewandowski","doi":"10.5604/17322693.1229346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThere are two commercially available tests for measurement of serum free light chains (sFLC) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients - Freelite and N Latex FLC. The aim of this study was to perform an assessment and direct comparison of the usefulness of the methods in routine clinical practice.\n\n\nMETHODS\n40 refractory/relapsed MM patients underwent routine disease activity assessment studies, along with sFLC analysis using both assays. Correlation and concordance between the tests and sensitivity of studied methods of sFLC assessment were established. Special attention was focused on sFLC results in patients finally evaluated after completing the treatment.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA weak correlation for the measurement of both κ [Passing-Bablok slope (PB) = 0.7681] and λ chains [(PB) = 1.542] was found. Using Bland-Altman plots, a bias of 0.0467 (κ) and -0.2133 (λ) between the measurements was documented. The concordance coefficient equaled 0.87 for κ, 0.62 for λ and 0.52 for κ/λ ratio. Ten patients had an abnormal Freelite assay κ/λ ratio and normal N Latex FLC κ/λ ratio. Three of these patients had negative serum protein electrophoresis results and fulfilled diagnostic criteria of stringent complete remission (sCR) according to N Latex FLC (but not according to Freelite). When the κ/λ ratio obtained by both methods was compared to patients' serum/urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation results, sensitivity of Freelite and N Latex FLC was established to be 62.5% and 41%, respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThere was no strong correlation or concordance between the two assays, and the sensitivity in terms of sFLC detection was different. This may cause problems when diagnosis of sCR is considered.","PeriodicalId":87132,"journal":{"name":"Postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (Online)","volume":"16 1","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/17322693.1229346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION There are two commercially available tests for measurement of serum free light chains (sFLC) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients - Freelite and N Latex FLC. The aim of this study was to perform an assessment and direct comparison of the usefulness of the methods in routine clinical practice. METHODS 40 refractory/relapsed MM patients underwent routine disease activity assessment studies, along with sFLC analysis using both assays. Correlation and concordance between the tests and sensitivity of studied methods of sFLC assessment were established. Special attention was focused on sFLC results in patients finally evaluated after completing the treatment. RESULTS A weak correlation for the measurement of both κ [Passing-Bablok slope (PB) = 0.7681] and λ chains [(PB) = 1.542] was found. Using Bland-Altman plots, a bias of 0.0467 (κ) and -0.2133 (λ) between the measurements was documented. The concordance coefficient equaled 0.87 for κ, 0.62 for λ and 0.52 for κ/λ ratio. Ten patients had an abnormal Freelite assay κ/λ ratio and normal N Latex FLC κ/λ ratio. Three of these patients had negative serum protein electrophoresis results and fulfilled diagnostic criteria of stringent complete remission (sCR) according to N Latex FLC (but not according to Freelite). When the κ/λ ratio obtained by both methods was compared to patients' serum/urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation results, sensitivity of Freelite and N Latex FLC was established to be 62.5% and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS There was no strong correlation or concordance between the two assays, and the sensitivity in terms of sFLC detection was different. This may cause problems when diagnosis of sCR is considered.
血清游离轻链检测在多发性骨髓瘤患者中的临床应用:两种不同检测方法的比较分析
有两种市售的检测多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者血清游离轻链(sFLC)的方法——Freelite和N Latex FLC。本研究的目的是评估和直接比较这些方法在常规临床实践中的有效性。方法40例难治性/复发性MM患者进行常规疾病活动性评估研究,并使用两种方法进行sFLC分析。建立了sFLC评价方法的试验结果与敏感性之间的相关性和一致性。特别关注的是完成治疗后最终评估患者的sFLC结果。结果κ [Passing-Bablok斜率(PB) = 0.7681]与λ链[(PB) = 1.542]之间存在微弱的sa相关性。使用Bland-Altman图,测量结果之间的偏差为0.0467 (κ)和-0.2133 (λ)。κ的一致性系数为0.87,λ的一致性系数为0.62,κ/λ比值为0.52。10例患者Freelite assay κ/λ比异常,N Latex FLC κ/λ比正常。其中3例患者血清蛋白电泳结果为阴性,符合N Latex FLC(但不符合Freelite)严格完全缓解(sCR)的诊断标准。将两种方法获得的κ/λ比值与患者血清/尿蛋白电泳和免疫固定结果进行比较,建立Freelite和N Latex FLC的敏感性分别为62.5%和41%。结论两种检测方法之间没有很强的相关性或一致性,检测sFLC的灵敏度存在差异。当考虑sCR的诊断时,这可能会引起问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信