Defoe's Robinson Crusoe: "Maps," Natural Law, and the Enemy

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Ala Alryyes
{"title":"Defoe's Robinson Crusoe: \"Maps,\" Natural Law, and the Enemy","authors":"Ala Alryyes","doi":"10.1215/00982601-8718655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Although it may appear that geography is distinguished by an objective, neutral subject, a genealogy of geographical knowledge reveals that seventeenth- and eighteenth-century European polemics over the demarcations and legal representations of space were imbued with polemos itself, war and conflict. In this article, I examine the polemical nature of Robinson Crusoe's spatial experience and constructions, maritime and insular. Most readers know Defoe's Robinson Crusoe for the shipwreck and the island. This sells short the novel's formal spatial design, which contrasts its hero's early mobility with his subsequent settlement(s), while concurrently encoding ideas about law, enmity, and sovereignty into geographic constructions. In Defoe's space, theory and practice of empire are intermeshed. As I shall argue, Defoe's representations of his hero's achievements—both Crusoe's astute seafaring and his later claims to sovereignty and possession of \"his\" island—build on extraliterary systems of knowledge in which war offers blueprints for grasping colonial encounters and global space. Defoe exploits two related imperial geographical discourses, natural law (and its derivative the Law of Nations, forerunner of today's International Law and Law of War), and cartography, drawing on them for both verisimilar and fantastical representations in his novel.","PeriodicalId":43296,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LIFE","volume":"90 1","pages":"51 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY LIFE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00982601-8718655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:Although it may appear that geography is distinguished by an objective, neutral subject, a genealogy of geographical knowledge reveals that seventeenth- and eighteenth-century European polemics over the demarcations and legal representations of space were imbued with polemos itself, war and conflict. In this article, I examine the polemical nature of Robinson Crusoe's spatial experience and constructions, maritime and insular. Most readers know Defoe's Robinson Crusoe for the shipwreck and the island. This sells short the novel's formal spatial design, which contrasts its hero's early mobility with his subsequent settlement(s), while concurrently encoding ideas about law, enmity, and sovereignty into geographic constructions. In Defoe's space, theory and practice of empire are intermeshed. As I shall argue, Defoe's representations of his hero's achievements—both Crusoe's astute seafaring and his later claims to sovereignty and possession of "his" island—build on extraliterary systems of knowledge in which war offers blueprints for grasping colonial encounters and global space. Defoe exploits two related imperial geographical discourses, natural law (and its derivative the Law of Nations, forerunner of today's International Law and Law of War), and cartography, drawing on them for both verisimilar and fantastical representations in his novel.
笛福的《鲁滨逊漂流记》:《地图》、《自然法》和《敌人》
摘要:尽管地理学似乎是一门客观、中立的学科,但地理学知识的谱系揭示,17世纪和18世纪欧洲关于空间划界和法律表述的争论本身就充满了争论、战争和冲突。在这篇文章中,我考察了鲁滨逊漂流记的空间经验和结构的争论性,海洋和岛屿。大多数读者知道笛福的《鲁滨逊漂流记》是因为海难和岛屿。这使得小说的正式空间设计显得不足,它将主人公早期的流动性与他后来的定居形成对比,同时将法律、敌意和主权等概念编码到地理结构中。在笛福的空间里,帝国的理论与实践交织在一起。正如我将要论证的那样,笛福对他的英雄成就的表现——无论是鲁滨逊精明的航海生涯,还是他后来对“他的”岛屿的主权和所有权的主张——都建立在文学之外的知识体系之上,在这个体系中,战争为掌握殖民地遭遇和全球空间提供了蓝图。笛福利用了两个相关的帝国地理话语,自然法(及其衍生的《国家法》,今天的《国际法》和《战争法》的前身)和地图学,在他的小说中对它们进行了真实和幻想的表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Committed to interdisciplinary exchange, Eighteenth-Century Life addresses all aspects of European and world culture during the long eighteenth century, 1660–1815. The most wide-ranging journal of eighteenth-century studies, it also encourages diverse methodologies—from close reading to cultural studies—and it always welcomes suggestions for review essays, special issues, and innovative approaches. Among Eighteenth-Century Life’s noteworthy regular features are its film forums, its review essays, its book-length special issues, and the longest and most eclectic lists of books received of any journal in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书