On the interpretation of the soil concept in the works of the senior Slavophiles and in the socio-political program of F.M.Dostoevsky in the 1860–1870s

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K. Barsht
{"title":"On the interpretation of the soil concept in the works of the senior Slavophiles and in the socio-political program of F.M.Dostoevsky in the 1860–1870s","authors":"K. Barsht","doi":"10.21638/spbu09.2022.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the genesis and internal structure of the “soil” concept in the works of F.M.Dostoevsky and of various Slavophiles: A. S.Khomyakov, I.V.Kireevsky, Yu.F. Samarin, and other writers in the sphere of Dostoevsky’s interests in 1850–1870: A.I.Herzen, A.A.Grigoriev, N.N. Strakhov, Archimandrite Theodore (A.M.Bukharev), and others. The author traces the conditions under which the magazine Vremya was created and explores why the ideology of “pochvennichestvo” was unclear to the Russian public, including some of its supporters (N.N. Strakhov). The author assumes that this idea can be traced from early letters to brother Mikhail (1838), to the “Pushkin Speech” (1880), and to the novel The Brothers Karamazov. The author criticizes claims about a new unwritten novel dedicated to the further path of Alyosha Karamazov, where, according to the “Diary” of A. S. Suvorin, he would have become a revolutionary. The author concludes that there is a deep unity linking Dostoevsky’s ideal of “pochvennichestvo” and the root idea of his literary work, which can be defined as mental searching for an answer to the question of the meaning of life, with the assertion of a direct dependence between moral state of a human being and his religious — ontological position.","PeriodicalId":41205,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Yazyk i Literatura","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Yazyk i Literatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the genesis and internal structure of the “soil” concept in the works of F.M.Dostoevsky and of various Slavophiles: A. S.Khomyakov, I.V.Kireevsky, Yu.F. Samarin, and other writers in the sphere of Dostoevsky’s interests in 1850–1870: A.I.Herzen, A.A.Grigoriev, N.N. Strakhov, Archimandrite Theodore (A.M.Bukharev), and others. The author traces the conditions under which the magazine Vremya was created and explores why the ideology of “pochvennichestvo” was unclear to the Russian public, including some of its supporters (N.N. Strakhov). The author assumes that this idea can be traced from early letters to brother Mikhail (1838), to the “Pushkin Speech” (1880), and to the novel The Brothers Karamazov. The author criticizes claims about a new unwritten novel dedicated to the further path of Alyosha Karamazov, where, according to the “Diary” of A. S. Suvorin, he would have become a revolutionary. The author concludes that there is a deep unity linking Dostoevsky’s ideal of “pochvennichestvo” and the root idea of his literary work, which can be defined as mental searching for an answer to the question of the meaning of life, with the assertion of a direct dependence between moral state of a human being and his religious — ontological position.
论1860 - 1870年代高级斯拉夫主义者作品和陀思妥耶夫斯基社会政治纲领中对土壤概念的解释
本文分析了陀思妥耶夫斯基作品中“土壤”概念的起源和内部结构,以及各斯拉夫派的作品:霍米亚科夫、基里耶夫斯基、尤夫。萨马林,以及1850-1870年间陀思妥耶夫斯基感兴趣的其他作家:A.I.Herzen, A.A.Grigoriev, N.N. Strakhov, Archimandrite Theodore (a.m.b harev)等。作者追溯了《Vremya》杂志创立的条件,并探讨了为什么“pochvennichestvo”的意识形态不为俄罗斯公众所知,包括它的一些支持者(N.N. Strakhov)。作者认为,这种想法可以追溯到早期给米哈伊尔兄弟的信件(1838年)、“普希金演讲”(1880年)和小说《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》。作者批评了关于一部新的未写的小说致力于阿廖沙·卡拉马佐夫(Alyosha Karamazov)的进一步道路的说法,根据a·s·苏沃林(a . S. Suvorin)的“日记”,他将成为一名革命者。作者认为,陀思妥耶夫斯基的“波切文尼切斯特沃”理想与其文学创作的根本思想存在着深刻的统一性。陀思妥耶夫斯基的“波切文尼切斯特沃”思想可以定义为对生命意义问题答案的精神探索,并主张人的道德状态与其宗教本体论立场之间存在着直接的依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书