The Pancasila Guidelines Bill and Ideological Contestation in Indonesia

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Happy David Pradhan, Agus Tinus
{"title":"The Pancasila Guidelines Bill and Ideological Contestation in Indonesia","authors":"Happy David Pradhan, Agus Tinus","doi":"10.26618/ojip.v11i2.4269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This discursive article based on secondary sources attempts a discourse analysis of a recently proposed legislation in Indonesia to delineate the contours of ideological contestation between the proponents of the Statist Ideology of Pancasila, and the revival of challenges to it from religious radicalism. By tracing the history of the confrontation between contending ideological conceptions of the Indonesian State, and contextualizing it, through the sociological jurisprudential approach, to the recently proposed, and subsequently postponed, Pancasila Guidelines Bill, 2020, an attempt has been made to decipher the undercurrents of the struggle for sociopolitical hegemony that drive the imperatives in Indonesian polity. The implicit negotiation of interests between the Statist political elites, the civil nationalist religious clergy and the couched praetorian military about the relevance and status of Pancasila as the State Ideology of Indonesia, as outlined in the proposed statute, is taken to be reflective of the challenges confronting, and choices available to the future direction of democracy and inclusivity in Indonesia in the face of growing religious radicalism threatening democratic stability.","PeriodicalId":40252,"journal":{"name":"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v11i2.4269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This discursive article based on secondary sources attempts a discourse analysis of a recently proposed legislation in Indonesia to delineate the contours of ideological contestation between the proponents of the Statist Ideology of Pancasila, and the revival of challenges to it from religious radicalism. By tracing the history of the confrontation between contending ideological conceptions of the Indonesian State, and contextualizing it, through the sociological jurisprudential approach, to the recently proposed, and subsequently postponed, Pancasila Guidelines Bill, 2020, an attempt has been made to decipher the undercurrents of the struggle for sociopolitical hegemony that drive the imperatives in Indonesian polity. The implicit negotiation of interests between the Statist political elites, the civil nationalist religious clergy and the couched praetorian military about the relevance and status of Pancasila as the State Ideology of Indonesia, as outlined in the proposed statute, is taken to be reflective of the challenges confronting, and choices available to the future direction of democracy and inclusivity in Indonesia in the face of growing religious radicalism threatening democratic stability.
潘卡西拉指导法案与印尼的意识形态之争
这篇基于二手资料的话语文章试图对印度尼西亚最近提出的一项立法进行话语分析,以描绘潘卡西拉中央集权意识形态支持者之间意识形态争论的轮廓,以及宗教激进主义对其的挑战。通过追溯印度尼西亚国家意识形态对立概念之间的对抗历史,并通过社会学法理学方法将其置于最近提出并随后推迟的2020年潘卡西拉指导法案的背景下,试图解读推动印度尼西亚政体的社会政治霸权斗争的暗流。国家主义政治精英、民间民族主义宗教神职人员和含蓄的禁卫军之间关于潘卡西拉作为印度尼西亚国家意识形态的相关性和地位的隐含利益谈判,正如拟议法规所概述的那样,被认为反映了面临的挑战,以及面对日益增长的威胁民主稳定的宗教激进主义,印尼未来民主和包容性方向的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信