2009 개정과 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 생명과학 I 교과서의 탐구활동 비교

박은경, Eunyoung Jeong
{"title":"2009 개정과 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 생명과학 I 교과서의 탐구활동 비교","authors":"박은경, Eunyoung Jeong","doi":"10.15717/BIOEDU.2019.47.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the inquiry activities in Life Science I textbooks according to the 2009 revised and 2015 revised science curriculum were analysed in terms of frequency, type, skills, and scientific and engineering practices. The results of the study are as follows. First, the frequency of inquiry activity increased in the 2015 revised Life Science I textbooks. Second, the most common type was ‘Thinking’ in both the 2015 revised and the 2009 revised Life Science I textbooks. However, the rate of ‘Simulation activity’, ‘Investigation, Discussion, Debate’ and ‘Expressing’ increased. Third, there were many ‘Interpretation of data’ and ‘Inferring’ in the 2015 revised and 2009 revised Life Science textbooks, and there was no ‘Problem recognition’. Fourth, there were many ‘Analyzing and interpreting data’ and ‘Constructing explanations and designing solutions’. However, ‘Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’ increased greatly, ‘Developing and using models’, ‘Using mathematics and computational thinking’ and ‘Engaging in argument from evidence’ increased in the 2015 revised Life Science I textbooks. And ‘Questioning and problem definition’ was not addressed. Finally, the frequency of inquiry activities, the number of inquiry skills and scientific and engineering practices differed according to the publishers. In conclusion, a variety of inquiry activities should be presented and various inquiry skills and practices are emphasized.","PeriodicalId":84416,"journal":{"name":"Cell biology education","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell biology education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2019.47.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, the inquiry activities in Life Science I textbooks according to the 2009 revised and 2015 revised science curriculum were analysed in terms of frequency, type, skills, and scientific and engineering practices. The results of the study are as follows. First, the frequency of inquiry activity increased in the 2015 revised Life Science I textbooks. Second, the most common type was ‘Thinking’ in both the 2015 revised and the 2009 revised Life Science I textbooks. However, the rate of ‘Simulation activity’, ‘Investigation, Discussion, Debate’ and ‘Expressing’ increased. Third, there were many ‘Interpretation of data’ and ‘Inferring’ in the 2015 revised and 2009 revised Life Science textbooks, and there was no ‘Problem recognition’. Fourth, there were many ‘Analyzing and interpreting data’ and ‘Constructing explanations and designing solutions’. However, ‘Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’ increased greatly, ‘Developing and using models’, ‘Using mathematics and computational thinking’ and ‘Engaging in argument from evidence’ increased in the 2015 revised Life Science I textbooks. And ‘Questioning and problem definition’ was not addressed. Finally, the frequency of inquiry activities, the number of inquiry skills and scientific and engineering practices differed according to the publishers. In conclusion, a variety of inquiry activities should be presented and various inquiry skills and practices are emphasized.
根据2009年修订与2015年修订的教育课程,比较生命科学I教科书的探索活动
本研究以2009年修订和2015年修订的科学课程为基础,从频率、类型、技能、科学实践和工程实践等方面分析了生命科学1教材中的探究活动。研究结果如下:首先,在2015年修订的生命科学1教材中,探究活动的频率有所增加。其次,在2015年修订和2009年修订的生命科学1教科书中,最常见的类型是“思考”。然而,“模拟活动”、“调查、讨论、辩论”和“表达”的比例有所增加。第三,2015年修订和2009年修订的生命科学教科书中有很多“数据解释”和“推断”,没有“问题识别”。第四,有很多“分析和解释数据”和“构建解释和设计解决方案”。然而,在2015年修订的生命科学I教科书中,“获取、评估和交流信息”大幅增加,“开发和使用模型”,“使用数学和计算思维”和“从证据中进行论证”增加。“提问和问题定义”也没有提到。最后,探究活动的频率、探究技能的数量以及科学和工程实践的数量因出版商而异。总之,应该呈现各种各样的探究活动,强调各种探究技巧和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信