Management of Low Back Pain - Call for an Integrated Interventional Approach

Shashi Vadhanan
{"title":"Management of Low Back Pain - Call for an Integrated Interventional Approach","authors":"Shashi Vadhanan","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.1000303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Using advanced imaging, neurophysiologic and precision diagnostic techniques spinal pain can be diagnosed in only 50 to 80% of the patients. 20 to 50% remain incorrectly diagnosed. Furthermore axial and periaxial pattern of pain from ligaments, muscles, intervertebral discs and facet joints overlap significantly. Therefore patients continue to suffer because of diagnostic dilemma and also pose a therapeutic challenge. Rarely does low back pain involve only a single pain generator, therefore it is unlikely that a single treatment, such as surgery will result in the best outcome for the majority of the causes of low back pain.Materials and method: All cases of Low back Pain reporting to tertiary care service hospital from 2012 to 2016 were evaluated. Cases which responded to conservative management were excluded.Observation: A total of 374 cases were offered pain intervention procedure. Of these 45 (12%) required a second interventional procedure as the pain relief was poor. All cases were followed up for 6 months and pain relief was recorded as Good, satisfactory or poor as told by the patient. We found that 78% reported good relief, 18% reported satisfactory relief while 4% reported poor relief from pain.Conclusion: Scientific evaluation of interventional pain treatments is difficult due to lack of any objective test for pain. Also we cannot have true controls. A single interventional procedure may not suffice in all cases. The Surgeon needs to adopt other modalities to provide pain relief to the ailing patient.","PeriodicalId":16641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain and Relief","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Using advanced imaging, neurophysiologic and precision diagnostic techniques spinal pain can be diagnosed in only 50 to 80% of the patients. 20 to 50% remain incorrectly diagnosed. Furthermore axial and periaxial pattern of pain from ligaments, muscles, intervertebral discs and facet joints overlap significantly. Therefore patients continue to suffer because of diagnostic dilemma and also pose a therapeutic challenge. Rarely does low back pain involve only a single pain generator, therefore it is unlikely that a single treatment, such as surgery will result in the best outcome for the majority of the causes of low back pain.Materials and method: All cases of Low back Pain reporting to tertiary care service hospital from 2012 to 2016 were evaluated. Cases which responded to conservative management were excluded.Observation: A total of 374 cases were offered pain intervention procedure. Of these 45 (12%) required a second interventional procedure as the pain relief was poor. All cases were followed up for 6 months and pain relief was recorded as Good, satisfactory or poor as told by the patient. We found that 78% reported good relief, 18% reported satisfactory relief while 4% reported poor relief from pain.Conclusion: Scientific evaluation of interventional pain treatments is difficult due to lack of any objective test for pain. Also we cannot have true controls. A single interventional procedure may not suffice in all cases. The Surgeon needs to adopt other modalities to provide pain relief to the ailing patient.
腰痛的治疗-呼吁采用综合介入治疗方法
利用先进的影像学、神经生理学和精确诊断技术,只有50 - 80%的患者可以诊断出脊柱疼痛。20%至50%仍被误诊。此外,韧带、肌肉、椎间盘和关节突关节的轴向和轴向疼痛明显重叠。因此,由于诊断困境,患者继续遭受痛苦,也对治疗提出了挑战。腰痛很少只涉及单一的疼痛源,因此,单一的治疗方法,如手术,不太可能对大多数引起腰痛的原因产生最好的结果。材料与方法:对2012 - 2016年三级保健服务医院报告的所有腰痛病例进行评价。排除对保守治疗有反应的病例。观察:374例患者接受疼痛干预治疗。其中45例(12%)由于疼痛缓解效果不佳,需要进行第二次介入手术。所有病例随访6个月,疼痛缓解情况根据患者自述分为好、满意或差。我们发现78%的人报告良好的缓解,18%的人报告满意的缓解,而4%的人报告疼痛缓解不佳。结论:由于缺乏对疼痛的客观检测,难以对介入性疼痛治疗进行科学评价。此外,我们也无法拥有真正的控制。单一的介入手术可能不能满足所有病例。外科医生需要采用其他方式来减轻病人的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信