La política de desarrollo rural en México. ¿Existe correspondencia entre lo formal y lo real?

Luis Gómez Oliver , Angélica Tacuba Santos
{"title":"La política de desarrollo rural en México. ¿Existe correspondencia entre lo formal y lo real?","authors":"Luis Gómez Oliver ,&nbsp;Angélica Tacuba Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.eunam.2017.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article is an approach to the issue of public policy strategy for rural development in Mexico. It aims to establish contrasts between the policy which would result from current regulations and the actual impact of government action on productive and social conditions in rural areas; and between regulatory instruments governing the planning, design and practice of public policy and its results in recent years. The first section reviews various theoretical approaches to establish a definition of rural development for policy analysis, considering the complexity and the many factors that explain the reality of the Mexican countryside and the population that lives there. The second section presents an evaluation exercise reviewing three specific indicators in rural areas: 1) inequality; 2) poverty; 3) agricultural product. The third section points out the rural development considering the two existing regulatory mechanisms of planning and execution of public policy for rural and agricultural development: 1) Rural Sustainable Development Act of 2001 (<span>rsda</span>); 2) the Special Concurrent Program for Sustainable Rural Development (<span>scp</span>), providing arguments to conclude that rural development in Mexico has lacked a national strategy, which marks a rift with the provisions of the regulations and the decisiveness that has rural economic and social development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100391,"journal":{"name":"Economía UNAM","volume":"14 42","pages":"Pages 93-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.eunam.2017.09.004","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economía UNAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665952X1730035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This article is an approach to the issue of public policy strategy for rural development in Mexico. It aims to establish contrasts between the policy which would result from current regulations and the actual impact of government action on productive and social conditions in rural areas; and between regulatory instruments governing the planning, design and practice of public policy and its results in recent years. The first section reviews various theoretical approaches to establish a definition of rural development for policy analysis, considering the complexity and the many factors that explain the reality of the Mexican countryside and the population that lives there. The second section presents an evaluation exercise reviewing three specific indicators in rural areas: 1) inequality; 2) poverty; 3) agricultural product. The third section points out the rural development considering the two existing regulatory mechanisms of planning and execution of public policy for rural and agricultural development: 1) Rural Sustainable Development Act of 2001 (rsda); 2) the Special Concurrent Program for Sustainable Rural Development (scp), providing arguments to conclude that rural development in Mexico has lacked a national strategy, which marks a rift with the provisions of the regulations and the decisiveness that has rural economic and social development.

墨西哥农村发展政策。形式与现实之间是否存在对应关系?
本文旨在探讨墨西哥农村发展的公共政策战略问题。它的目的是建立现行规章所产生的政策与政府行动对农村地区生产和社会条件的实际影响之间的对比;以及近年来管理公共政策规划、设计和实践的监管工具及其结果之间的关系。第一部分回顾了为政策分析建立农村发展定义的各种理论方法,考虑到解释墨西哥农村和居住在那里的人口的现实的复杂性和许多因素。第二部分介绍了一项评估工作,审查了农村地区的三个具体指标:1)不平等;2)贫困;3)农产品。第三部分指出农村发展考虑到现有的两种监管机制的规划和执行农村和农业发展公共政策:1)2001年农村可持续发展法案(rsda);2)可持续农村发展特别并行计划(scp),提供论据得出结论,认为墨西哥的农村发展缺乏国家战略,这标志着法规规定和农村经济和社会发展的决定性的分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信