Comparison of in-hospital and long-term mortality and assessment of their predictors in patients with myocardial infarction and unstable angina

A. Shchinova, A. Potekhina, Y. Dolgusheva, Yuliya E. Efremova, A. Osokina, A. Filatova, E. V. Sorokin, I. I. Shestova, S. I. Provatorov
{"title":"Comparison of in-hospital and long-term mortality and assessment of their predictors in patients with myocardial infarction and unstable angina","authors":"A. Shchinova, A. Potekhina, Y. Dolgusheva, Yuliya E. Efremova, A. Osokina, A. Filatova, E. V. Sorokin, I. I. Shestova, S. I. Provatorov","doi":"10.18786/2072-0505-2023-51-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The extent of myocardial damage largely determines both in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. According to the literature, the in-hospital and long-term mortality rates in patients with unstable angina (UA) are lower than those in the patients with myocardial infarction (MI). \nAim: To evaluate the in-hospital and long-term mortality rates and their predictors in patients undergoing in-patient treatment for acute coronary syndrome (MI and UA) in the regional cardiovascular center with the service territory of 1 million persons. \nMaterials and methods: This retrospective registry study enrolled 1130 patients (715 [63.3%] men, 415 [36.7%] women) who were treated for UA and MI in the regional cardiovascular center in 2019. Based on the discharge diagnosis, the patients were divided into two groups: patients with MI (n = 766) and those with an UA episode (n = 364). The in-hospital and delayed mortality rates, as well as their predictors, were analyzed in both groups. The mean duration of the follow-up was 17.8 3.6 months. \nResults: The in-hospital mortality in patients with confirmed MI was 11.1% (85 patients) versus 0.27% (1 patient) in the UA patients (p 0.001). The independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in MI patients were a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) (odds ratio (OR) 0.9021, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82090.9914, p = 0.0324), chronic kidney disease C3a and above (OR 9.3205, 95% CI 2.670632.5283, p = 0.0005), and the extension of coronary involvement at coronary angiography (OR 1.3526, 95% CI 1.06670.0127, p = 0.0127). The long-term mortality in MI patients was 10.4% (72 patients) with no significant difference from that in UA patients (9.9%, 36 patients, p = 0.76). The independent predictors of long-term mortality after MI were older age (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.011.22, p = 0.0052), chronic kidney disease C3a and above (OR 2.3375, 95% CI 1.13924.7963, p = 0.0206), decreased EF (OR 0.8895, 95% CI 0.730.99, p = 0.0364), atrial fibrillation on admission (OR 3.1462, 95% CI 1.35107.3268, p = 0.0079), and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.3163, 95% CI 1.25524.2744, p = 0.0072). In the UA patients, the predictors of the long-term mortality were a decrease in LV EF (OR 0.9139, 95% CI 0.86830.9619, p = 0.0006) and in blood hemoglobin level (OR 0.9729, 95% CI 0.95440.9917, p = 0.0050). \nConclusion: The in-hospital mortality in UA patients is lower than that in MI patients, with comparable long-term mortality. This indicates the need of active follow-up of the patients with past UA, irrespective of the endovascular assessment and intervention.","PeriodicalId":7638,"journal":{"name":"Almanac of Clinical Medicine","volume":"294 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Almanac of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2023-51-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The extent of myocardial damage largely determines both in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. According to the literature, the in-hospital and long-term mortality rates in patients with unstable angina (UA) are lower than those in the patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Aim: To evaluate the in-hospital and long-term mortality rates and their predictors in patients undergoing in-patient treatment for acute coronary syndrome (MI and UA) in the regional cardiovascular center with the service territory of 1 million persons. Materials and methods: This retrospective registry study enrolled 1130 patients (715 [63.3%] men, 415 [36.7%] women) who were treated for UA and MI in the regional cardiovascular center in 2019. Based on the discharge diagnosis, the patients were divided into two groups: patients with MI (n = 766) and those with an UA episode (n = 364). The in-hospital and delayed mortality rates, as well as their predictors, were analyzed in both groups. The mean duration of the follow-up was 17.8 3.6 months. Results: The in-hospital mortality in patients with confirmed MI was 11.1% (85 patients) versus 0.27% (1 patient) in the UA patients (p 0.001). The independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in MI patients were a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) (odds ratio (OR) 0.9021, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82090.9914, p = 0.0324), chronic kidney disease C3a and above (OR 9.3205, 95% CI 2.670632.5283, p = 0.0005), and the extension of coronary involvement at coronary angiography (OR 1.3526, 95% CI 1.06670.0127, p = 0.0127). The long-term mortality in MI patients was 10.4% (72 patients) with no significant difference from that in UA patients (9.9%, 36 patients, p = 0.76). The independent predictors of long-term mortality after MI were older age (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.011.22, p = 0.0052), chronic kidney disease C3a and above (OR 2.3375, 95% CI 1.13924.7963, p = 0.0206), decreased EF (OR 0.8895, 95% CI 0.730.99, p = 0.0364), atrial fibrillation on admission (OR 3.1462, 95% CI 1.35107.3268, p = 0.0079), and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.3163, 95% CI 1.25524.2744, p = 0.0072). In the UA patients, the predictors of the long-term mortality were a decrease in LV EF (OR 0.9139, 95% CI 0.86830.9619, p = 0.0006) and in blood hemoglobin level (OR 0.9729, 95% CI 0.95440.9917, p = 0.0050). Conclusion: The in-hospital mortality in UA patients is lower than that in MI patients, with comparable long-term mortality. This indicates the need of active follow-up of the patients with past UA, irrespective of the endovascular assessment and intervention.
心肌梗死合并不稳定型心绞痛患者住院死亡率与长期死亡率的比较及其预测因素的评估
背景:心肌损伤程度在很大程度上决定了急性冠脉综合征患者的住院和长期死亡率。文献显示,不稳定型心绞痛(UA)患者的住院死亡率和远期死亡率均低于心肌梗死(MI)患者。目的:评价100万地区心血管中心急性冠脉综合征(MI和UA)住院患者的住院死亡率和长期死亡率及其预测因素。材料和方法:本回顾性登记研究纳入了2019年在区域心血管中心接受UA和MI治疗的1130例患者(男性715例[63.3%],女性415例[36.7%])。根据出院诊断,将患者分为两组:MI患者(n = 766)和UA发作患者(n = 364)。对两组患者的住院死亡率和延迟死亡率及其预测因素进行了分析。平均随访时间17.8 - 3.6个月。结果:确诊心肌梗死患者的住院死亡率为11.1%(85例),而UA患者的住院死亡率为0.27%(1例)(p 0.001)。心肌梗死患者住院死亡率的独立预测因子为左室射血分数(LV EF)降低(优势比0.9021,95%可信区间(CI) 0.82090.9914, p = 0.0324)、慢性肾脏疾病C3a及以上(OR 9.3205, 95% CI 2.670632.5283, p = 0.0005)、冠状动脉造影时冠状动脉受累范围扩大(OR 1.3526, 95% CI 1.06670.0127, p = 0.0127)。心肌梗死患者的长期死亡率为10.4%(72例),与UA患者的长期死亡率(9.9%,36例,p = 0.76)无显著差异。心肌梗死后长期死亡率的独立预测因子为年龄较大(OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.011.22, p = 0.0052)、慢性肾脏疾病C3a及以上(OR 2.3375, 95% CI 1.13924.7963, p = 0.0206)、EF下降(OR 0.8895, 95% CI 0.730.99, p = 0.0364)、入院时房颤(OR 3.1462, 95% CI 1.35107.3268, p = 0.0079)和糖尿病(OR 2.3163, 95% CI 1.25524.2744, p = 0.0072)。在UA患者中,长期死亡率的预测因子为LV EF降低(OR 0.9139, 95% CI 0.86830.9619, p = 0.0006)和血血红蛋白水平降低(OR 0.9729, 95% CI 0.95440.9917, p = 0.0050)。结论:UA患者住院死亡率低于心肌梗死患者,长期死亡率相当。这表明需要对既往UA患者进行积极随访,而不考虑血管内评估和干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信