Maximal aerobic capacity is not correlated with microvascular nitric oxide contribution to endothelium- or beta-2-adrenergic receptor-dependent vasodilation in female adults

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Gabrielle A. Dillon, J. Barnes, J. Limberg, S. Ranadive, Sarah Baker, T. Curry, M. Joyner, R. Harvey
{"title":"Maximal aerobic capacity is not correlated with microvascular nitric oxide contribution to endothelium- or beta-2-adrenergic receptor-dependent vasodilation in female adults","authors":"Gabrielle A. Dillon, J. Barnes, J. Limberg, S. Ranadive, Sarah Baker, T. Curry, M. Joyner, R. Harvey","doi":"10.1152/physiol.2023.38.s1.5732410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The menopausal transition is characterized by impairments in microvascular endothelium- and β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR)-dependent vasodilation, both mediated in part by nitric oxide. Greater aerobic capacity is associated with preserved endothelium-dependent vasodilation in middle-aged and older males, but not estrogen-deficient postmenopausal females. However, the association between aerobic capacity and the nitric oxide contribution to endothelium-dependent vasodilation has not been described in pre- or postmenopausal females. Further, the association between aerobic capacity and β2AR-dependent vasodilation in pre- and postmenopausal females remains elusive. Thus, this study tested the hypothesis that maximal aerobic capacity (V̇O2max) and endothelium- and β2AR-dependent vasodilation (and their respective nitric oxide contributions) would be positively correlated in premenopausal, but not estrogen-deficient postmenopausal females. Methods: Ten premenopausal (PRE, 27±3 yrs) and ten postmenopausal (PM, 59±4 yrs) females participated. V̇O2max was determined by a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer. Brachial arterial catheters were placed for continuous blood pressure measurement and pharmacologic infusions. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured (venous occlusion plethysmography) at baseline (saline infusion) and during infusion of an endothelium-dependent vasodilator (acetylcholine: 1, 2, 4, 8 μg/100mL tissue/min) and β2AR agonist (terbutaline: 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 μg/100mL tissue/min), both with and without a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor co-infusion (L-NG-monomethylarginine [L-NMMA]: 1 mg/min). Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean blood pressure×100. Vasodilation was calculated as the area under the FVC dose response curve (AUC). The nitric oxide contributions were calculated as the difference between the AUC of acetylcholine or terbutaline alone and the AUC of the co-infusion with L-NMMA. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and linear regression analysis. Results: V̇O2max was not different between groups (PRE: 35.4±8.3 vs. PM: 29.1±7.9 ml/kg/min, p=0.15). Endothelial and β2AR vasodilation were greater in pre- compared to postmenopausal females (endothelial: PRE 45±15 vs. PM 17±13 FVC AUC, p<0.01; β2AR: PRE 35±12 vs. PM 18±11 FVC AUC, p<0.01). V̇O2max was not correlated with endothelium-dependent vasodilation or the nitric oxide contribution of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in pre- or postmenopausal females (r=-0.48-0.06, p>0.05 for all). V̇O2max was not correlated with β2AR-dependent vasodilation or the nitric oxide contribution of β2AR-mediated vasodilation in pre- or postmenopausal females (r=-0.27-0.26, p>0.05 for all). Conclusion: In contrast to what has been previously observed in males, maximal aerobic capacity was not correlated with endothelium- or β2AR-dependent microvascular vasodilation ortheir respective nitric oxide contributions in pre- or postmenopausal females. AHA 14PRE18040000, AHA 898649, NIH DK07352, NIH HL083947, NIH HL118154, NIH HL148144, NCATS UL1 TR000135 This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.","PeriodicalId":49694,"journal":{"name":"Physiology","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.2023.38.s1.5732410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The menopausal transition is characterized by impairments in microvascular endothelium- and β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR)-dependent vasodilation, both mediated in part by nitric oxide. Greater aerobic capacity is associated with preserved endothelium-dependent vasodilation in middle-aged and older males, but not estrogen-deficient postmenopausal females. However, the association between aerobic capacity and the nitric oxide contribution to endothelium-dependent vasodilation has not been described in pre- or postmenopausal females. Further, the association between aerobic capacity and β2AR-dependent vasodilation in pre- and postmenopausal females remains elusive. Thus, this study tested the hypothesis that maximal aerobic capacity (V̇O2max) and endothelium- and β2AR-dependent vasodilation (and their respective nitric oxide contributions) would be positively correlated in premenopausal, but not estrogen-deficient postmenopausal females. Methods: Ten premenopausal (PRE, 27±3 yrs) and ten postmenopausal (PM, 59±4 yrs) females participated. V̇O2max was determined by a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer. Brachial arterial catheters were placed for continuous blood pressure measurement and pharmacologic infusions. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured (venous occlusion plethysmography) at baseline (saline infusion) and during infusion of an endothelium-dependent vasodilator (acetylcholine: 1, 2, 4, 8 μg/100mL tissue/min) and β2AR agonist (terbutaline: 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 μg/100mL tissue/min), both with and without a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor co-infusion (L-NG-monomethylarginine [L-NMMA]: 1 mg/min). Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FBF/mean blood pressure×100. Vasodilation was calculated as the area under the FVC dose response curve (AUC). The nitric oxide contributions were calculated as the difference between the AUC of acetylcholine or terbutaline alone and the AUC of the co-infusion with L-NMMA. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and linear regression analysis. Results: V̇O2max was not different between groups (PRE: 35.4±8.3 vs. PM: 29.1±7.9 ml/kg/min, p=0.15). Endothelial and β2AR vasodilation were greater in pre- compared to postmenopausal females (endothelial: PRE 45±15 vs. PM 17±13 FVC AUC, p<0.01; β2AR: PRE 35±12 vs. PM 18±11 FVC AUC, p<0.01). V̇O2max was not correlated with endothelium-dependent vasodilation or the nitric oxide contribution of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in pre- or postmenopausal females (r=-0.48-0.06, p>0.05 for all). V̇O2max was not correlated with β2AR-dependent vasodilation or the nitric oxide contribution of β2AR-mediated vasodilation in pre- or postmenopausal females (r=-0.27-0.26, p>0.05 for all). Conclusion: In contrast to what has been previously observed in males, maximal aerobic capacity was not correlated with endothelium- or β2AR-dependent microvascular vasodilation ortheir respective nitric oxide contributions in pre- or postmenopausal females. AHA 14PRE18040000, AHA 898649, NIH DK07352, NIH HL083947, NIH HL118154, NIH HL148144, NCATS UL1 TR000135 This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
在女性成人中,最大有氧能力与微血管一氧化氮对内皮或β -2-肾上腺素能受体依赖性血管舒张的贡献无关
背景:绝经过渡期的特点是微血管内皮和β2-肾上腺素能受体(β2AR)依赖性血管舒张功能受损,两者都部分由一氧化氮介导。在中老年男性中,更大的有氧能力与保留的内皮依赖性血管舒张有关,但与雌激素缺乏的绝经后女性无关。然而,在绝经前或绝经后女性中,有氧能力和一氧化氮对内皮依赖性血管舒张的贡献之间的关系尚未得到描述。此外,绝经前和绝经后女性的有氧能力和β 2ar依赖性血管舒张之间的关系仍然难以捉摸。因此,本研究验证了最大有氧能力(V * O2max)和内皮和β 2ar依赖性血管舒张(以及它们各自的一氧化氮贡献)在绝经前女性中呈正相关的假设,而在雌激素缺乏的绝经后女性中则不是。方法:绝经前(PRE, 27±3岁)10例,绝经后(PM, 59±4岁)10例。在自行车测力仪上进行分级运动试验,测定vo2max。放置肱动脉导管进行持续血压测量和药物输注。在基线(生理盐水输注)和输注内皮依赖性血管扩张剂(乙酰胆碱:1,2,4,8 μg/100mL组织/min)和β2AR激动剂(特布他林:0.1,0.5,1,2 μg/100mL组织/min)时测量前臂血流量(静脉闭塞容积图),无论是否联合输注一氧化氮合酶抑制剂(l - ng -单甲基精氨酸[L-NMMA]: 1 mg/min)。前臂血管传导(FVC)计算为FBF/平均血pressure×100。血管舒张以FVC剂量响应曲线下面积(AUC)计算。一氧化氮的贡献计算为单独使用乙酰胆碱或特布他林的AUC与联合输注L-NMMA的AUC之差。统计分析包括独立t检验和线性回归分析。结果:各组间V / O2max差异无统计学意义(PRE: 35.4±8.3 vs. PM: 29.1±7.9 ml/kg/min, p=0.15)。与绝经后女性相比,绝经前女性内皮细胞和β2AR血管舒张更大(内皮细胞:pre 45±15 vs PM 17±13 FVC AUC,均p0.05)。在绝经前或绝经后女性中,V * O2max与β 2ar依赖性血管舒张或一氧化氮对β 2ar介导的血管舒张的贡献无关(r=-0.27-0.26, p < 0.05)。结论:与先前在男性中观察到的结果相反,在绝经前或绝经后女性中,最大有氧能力与内皮或β 2ar依赖性微血管扩张或各自的一氧化氮贡献无关。AHA 14PRE18040000, AHA 898649, NIH DK07352, NIH HL083947, NIH HL118154, NIH HL148144, NCATS UL1 TR000135这是在美国生理学峰会2023会议上发表的全文摘要,仅以HTML格式提供。此摘要没有附加版本或附加内容。生理学没有参与同行评议过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology
Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Physiology journal features meticulously crafted review articles penned by esteemed leaders in their respective fields. These articles undergo rigorous peer review and showcase the forefront of cutting-edge advances across various domains of physiology. Our Editorial Board, comprised of distinguished leaders in the broad spectrum of physiology, convenes annually to deliberate and recommend pioneering topics for review articles, as well as select the most suitable scientists to author these articles. Join us in exploring the forefront of physiological research and innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信