Effect of Three different fluoride Varnishes on Streptococcus Mutans and Lactobacillus Biofilm: An Vitro Study

Moaaz Abdelhameed, Sahar Z Elazab, Wael Abdelkhalek, Ghada A. Elbaz
{"title":"Effect of Three different fluoride Varnishes on Streptococcus Mutans and Lactobacillus Biofilm: An Vitro Study","authors":"Moaaz Abdelhameed, Sahar Z Elazab, Wael Abdelkhalek, Ghada A. Elbaz","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2022.90121.1076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fluoride varnish is quickly and easily applied without the need for bulky mouth trays or suctioning of saliva. This is especially helpful for infants and toddlers. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of three different fluoride varnishes (Durashield, Flour Protector and Bifluoride 10) on streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus count (in vitro study). Materials and methods : Total of 144 acrylic discs were divided into two main equal groups of 72 discs in each (group A: for examination of Streptococcus mutans and group B: for examination of Lactobacillus ); each group was further subdivided into four equal subgroups based on the type of varnish applied to the disc surface (A1, B1: Durashield; A2, B2: Fl protector; A3, B3: Biflouride; A4, B4: untreated discs served as control). Saliva collected from single volunteer was poured into tubes until the discs were completely immersed and incubated for 24h, 48h and 5 days. Six discs from each subgroup were taken out from tubes every time and sonicated in saline. Suspensions were been plated on selective media for Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus . The numbers of colony-forming units (CFU/mL) on suitably diluted plates were been determined. Results : For all tested subgroups, the lowest amount bacterial count of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus was observed during the first 24 h, followed by a significant increase over the following 4 days. Biflouride subgroups had the lowest values of viable Streptocoocusmutans and Lactobacillus counts during all test periods. In comparison Durashield with Flour protector subgroup difference of viable counts of streptocoocusmutans and lactobacillus was observed but statistically non-significant. Conclusions : Biflouridevarnish exhibited the greatest antibacterial effect ( Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus ) compared to Durashield and flour protector. Fluor protector varnish showed the same inhibitory effect of Durashildvarnish despite Flour protector had lower fluoride concentration than Durashield.","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2022.90121.1076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fluoride varnish is quickly and easily applied without the need for bulky mouth trays or suctioning of saliva. This is especially helpful for infants and toddlers. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of three different fluoride varnishes (Durashield, Flour Protector and Bifluoride 10) on streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus count (in vitro study). Materials and methods : Total of 144 acrylic discs were divided into two main equal groups of 72 discs in each (group A: for examination of Streptococcus mutans and group B: for examination of Lactobacillus ); each group was further subdivided into four equal subgroups based on the type of varnish applied to the disc surface (A1, B1: Durashield; A2, B2: Fl protector; A3, B3: Biflouride; A4, B4: untreated discs served as control). Saliva collected from single volunteer was poured into tubes until the discs were completely immersed and incubated for 24h, 48h and 5 days. Six discs from each subgroup were taken out from tubes every time and sonicated in saline. Suspensions were been plated on selective media for Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus . The numbers of colony-forming units (CFU/mL) on suitably diluted plates were been determined. Results : For all tested subgroups, the lowest amount bacterial count of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus was observed during the first 24 h, followed by a significant increase over the following 4 days. Biflouride subgroups had the lowest values of viable Streptocoocusmutans and Lactobacillus counts during all test periods. In comparison Durashield with Flour protector subgroup difference of viable counts of streptocoocusmutans and lactobacillus was observed but statistically non-significant. Conclusions : Biflouridevarnish exhibited the greatest antibacterial effect ( Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus ) compared to Durashield and flour protector. Fluor protector varnish showed the same inhibitory effect of Durashildvarnish despite Flour protector had lower fluoride concentration than Durashield.
三种不同含氟清漆对变形链球菌和乳酸菌生物膜影响的体外研究
氟化物清漆是快速和容易的应用,而不需要庞大的口腔托盘或唾液的吸引。这对婴幼儿尤其有帮助。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较三种不同的氟化物清漆(Durashield, Flour Protector和bi氟化物10)对变形链球菌和乳酸菌数量的影响(体外研究)。材料与方法:144片丙烯酸片分为两组,每组72片(A组用于检测变形链球菌,B组用于检测乳酸菌);每组根据应用于椎间盘表面的清漆类型进一步细分为四个相等的亚组(A1, B1: durasshield;A2、B2: Fl保护器;A3、B3:二氟化物;A4, B4:未处理的椎间盘作为对照)。将单个志愿者的唾液倒入管中,直至培养皿完全浸没,孵育24小时、48小时和5天。每个亚组每次从试管中取出6个椎间盘,在生理盐水中超声。将悬浮液在变形链球菌和乳酸菌的选择性培养基上接种。在适当稀释的平板上测定菌落形成单位数(CFU/mL)。结果:在所有测试亚组中,变形链球菌和乳酸杆菌的细菌计数在前24小时内最低,随后在接下来的4天内显著增加。在所有试验期间,bi氟化物亚组的活链球菌和乳杆菌数量最低。durasshield亚组与Flour protector亚组比较,链球菌和乳酸菌活菌数差异无统计学意义。结论:与durasshield和面粉保护剂相比,双氟蝶油对变形链球菌和乳酸菌的抑菌效果最好。面粉保护剂的氟浓度低于Durashield,但氟保护剂的抑制效果与Durashield漆相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信