Task Content and Job Losses in the Great Lockdown

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Filippos Petroulakis
{"title":"Task Content and Job Losses in the Great Lockdown","authors":"Filippos Petroulakis","doi":"10.1177/00197939231161616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author examines the short-term labor market effects of the COVID-19 pandemic (aka the Great Lockdown recession) in the United States. Findings show that the task content is an important predictor of job losses; jobs with a high non-routine cognitive content are especially well-protected, even if they are not teleworkable. Teleworkability matters more for low-paying jobs. The importance of task content, particularly for non-routine cognitive tasks, is strong even after controlling for demographics and for differential sector and location shocks, while effects persist in the medium run. Jobs subject to higher structural turnover rates were much more likely to be terminated, suggesting that easier-to-replace employees were at a particular disadvantage, even within sectors. At the same time, labor hoarding may occur for more valuable matches. Individuals in low-skilled jobs fared comparatively better in industries with a high share of high-skilled workers, suggesting complementarities across skill types.","PeriodicalId":13504,"journal":{"name":"ILR Review","volume":"154 1","pages":"586 - 613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILR Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939231161616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The author examines the short-term labor market effects of the COVID-19 pandemic (aka the Great Lockdown recession) in the United States. Findings show that the task content is an important predictor of job losses; jobs with a high non-routine cognitive content are especially well-protected, even if they are not teleworkable. Teleworkability matters more for low-paying jobs. The importance of task content, particularly for non-routine cognitive tasks, is strong even after controlling for demographics and for differential sector and location shocks, while effects persist in the medium run. Jobs subject to higher structural turnover rates were much more likely to be terminated, suggesting that easier-to-replace employees were at a particular disadvantage, even within sectors. At the same time, labor hoarding may occur for more valuable matches. Individuals in low-skilled jobs fared comparatively better in industries with a high share of high-skilled workers, suggesting complementarities across skill types.
大封锁时期的任务内容和失业情况
作者研究了新冠肺炎大流行(又名大封锁衰退)对美国劳动力市场的短期影响。研究结果表明,任务内容是失业的重要预测因子;具有高度非常规认知内容的工作尤其受到很好的保护,即使它们不能远程操作。远程工作对低薪工作更重要。任务内容的重要性,特别是对于非常规的认知任务,即使在控制了人口统计数据和不同的部门和位置冲击之后,也是很强的,而影响在中期持续存在。结构性流动率较高的工作更有可能被终止,这表明更容易被取代的员工处于特别不利的地位,即使在部门内部也是如此。同时,劳动力囤积可能会发生在更有价值的匹配上。从事低技能工作的个人在拥有大量高技能工人的行业中表现相对较好,这表明各种技能类型之间存在互补性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ILR Review
ILR Review INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Issued quarterly since October 1947, the Industrial and Labor Relations Review is a leading interdisciplinary journal publishing original research on all aspects of the employment relationship. The journal also publishes reviews of some 30 books per year. This site offers an index of all articles and book reviews published since 1947, abstracts of all articles, and information about upcoming issues. At the "All Articles" and "All Book Reviews" pages, visitors can search on titles and authors. Use this site, too, to learn about upcoming articles and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信