{"title":"Paulus er ikke død – han lugter bare grimt: Den aksiale værdiomkalfatrings betydning for tidlig Kristusreligion","authors":"A. Petersen","doi":"10.7146/RT.V0I69.112743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Through a discussion of Dostoevsky’s depiction of the death of the staret in Brothers Karamazov, I discuss the olfactory channel of communication in religion with the aim in mind to tease apart the underlying ontology pertaining to different forms of religion. The focus is on impurity related to putrefaction in death. Contrary to the understanding represented by the ironic voice of the narrator in Brothers Karamazov, I explore the view holding the saintly person to undergo an olfactory transformation in death changing into a pleasurable aroma and thereby becoming an indexical token of celestial life. From Brothers Karamazov, I proceed to examine notions of divine presence and olfactory tokens in ancient Graeco-Roman culture. I use it as a historical foil to analyse Paul’s total inversion of the motif in 2 Cor 2, 14-17 and 4, 7-12 in which he portrays himself and his Christ-message as an indexical putrefaction of Christ. Thus, the title of my essay: “Paul isn’t dead, he just smells funny.” Finally, I discuss the extent to which such an understanding is encompassed by Philippe Descola’s notion of analogistic ontology. \nDANSK RESUMÉ: Jeg fokuserer i artiklen på en form for urenhed, som er knyttet til væmmelsen ved ligstank. I første omgang ser jeg på staretsens død i Brødrene Karamasov. Ad den vej bevæger jeg mig tilbage til græsk-romersk antik og drøfter sammenhængen mellem forestillingen om guddommeligt nærvær og velduft. Diametralt modsat denne opfattelse er Paulus’ skildring af sig selv og sit budskab som en omvandrende ligstank. Det er den aksiale spænding for fuld udluftning. Endelig diskuterer jeg i hvilket omfang, en sådan opfattelse og billedbrug lader sig rumme inden for Philippe Descolas tanke om analogismen som en af fire fundamentalontologier.","PeriodicalId":38779,"journal":{"name":"Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/RT.V0I69.112743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Through a discussion of Dostoevsky’s depiction of the death of the staret in Brothers Karamazov, I discuss the olfactory channel of communication in religion with the aim in mind to tease apart the underlying ontology pertaining to different forms of religion. The focus is on impurity related to putrefaction in death. Contrary to the understanding represented by the ironic voice of the narrator in Brothers Karamazov, I explore the view holding the saintly person to undergo an olfactory transformation in death changing into a pleasurable aroma and thereby becoming an indexical token of celestial life. From Brothers Karamazov, I proceed to examine notions of divine presence and olfactory tokens in ancient Graeco-Roman culture. I use it as a historical foil to analyse Paul’s total inversion of the motif in 2 Cor 2, 14-17 and 4, 7-12 in which he portrays himself and his Christ-message as an indexical putrefaction of Christ. Thus, the title of my essay: “Paul isn’t dead, he just smells funny.” Finally, I discuss the extent to which such an understanding is encompassed by Philippe Descola’s notion of analogistic ontology.
DANSK RESUMÉ: Jeg fokuserer i artiklen på en form for urenhed, som er knyttet til væmmelsen ved ligstank. I første omgang ser jeg på staretsens død i Brødrene Karamasov. Ad den vej bevæger jeg mig tilbage til græsk-romersk antik og drøfter sammenhængen mellem forestillingen om guddommeligt nærvær og velduft. Diametralt modsat denne opfattelse er Paulus’ skildring af sig selv og sit budskab som en omvandrende ligstank. Det er den aksiale spænding for fuld udluftning. Endelig diskuterer jeg i hvilket omfang, en sådan opfattelse og billedbrug lader sig rumme inden for Philippe Descolas tanke om analogismen som en af fire fundamentalontologier.
摘要:本文通过对陀思妥耶夫斯基在《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中对星宿之死的描写,探讨了宗教中沟通的嗅觉渠道,目的是梳理出不同形式宗教的潜在本体论。重点是与死亡腐烂有关的不洁净。与《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中叙述者讽刺的声音所代表的理解相反,我探索了这样一种观点,即认为圣人在死亡中经历了一种嗅觉转变,变成了一种令人愉悦的香气,从而成为天国生活的象征。从《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》开始,我继续研究古希腊罗马文化中神的存在和嗅觉标志的概念。我用它作为历史的衬托来分析保罗在哥林多后书2章14-17节和4章7-12节中对主题的完全颠倒,他把自己和他的基督信息描绘成基督的明显腐烂。因此,我文章的标题是:“保罗没死,他只是闻起来怪怪的。”最后,我讨论了菲利普·德斯科拉的类比本体论概念所包含的这种理解的程度。丹麦语RESUMÉ: Jeg fokuserer i artiklen peren form for unrenhed,有些是knttttet væmmelsen ved ligstank。Karamasov (Karamasov,卡拉马索夫)和den vej bevæger jeg migg tilbage till æ æsk-romersk antik og drø ter sammenhængen mellem foretillingen om guddommelight nærvær og velduft。完全不同的是,在保罗的技巧中,他表现出了自己的能力,而有些人甚至表现出了自己的能力。为充分的学习提供了一个良好的环境。恩德利·德斯科拉(Philippe Descolas)是一位著名的经济学家,他将自己的观点与其他经济学家的观点进行了类比。