Annaeus Cornutus and the Stoic Allegorical Tradition: Meaning, Sources, and Impact

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY
Ilaria L. E. Ramelli
{"title":"Annaeus Cornutus and the Stoic Allegorical Tradition: Meaning, Sources, and Impact","authors":"Ilaria L. E. Ramelli","doi":"10.4000/AITIA.2882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Roman Stoic Cornutus, who lived in the age of Nero, is the heir of an ancient and rich Stoic allegorical tradition applied to all aspects of traditional religion: literary myths, cultic epithets and attributes, and even iconographical representations of deities. Allegoresis (allegorical exegesis) was applied in antiquity to culturally and religiously authoritative texts. It was mainly practiced by “pagan” philosophers like Stoics and Middle and Neoplatonists and by philosophically minded Hellenistic Jewish and Christian exegetes, who read Scripture allegorically.Cornutus offers an excellent example of mythological allegoresis in his handbook of Greek theology. For each divinity, from Ouranos to Hades, Cornutus provides an allegorico-etymological interpretation of its names and epithets, its attributes, aspects of its myths and rituals, etc. Physical allegory (Zeus represents the ether, Hera the air, etc.) is prevalent, although there are also examples of ethical and historical exegeses. Special attention is demanded by Cornutus’ programmatic assertion—analysed below—that “The ancients were not people of no account, but they were also able to understand the nature of the cosmos and had the ability to philosophise on it by means of symbols and enigmata” (35). The ancient were nothing less than philosophers, since they were endowed with the understanding of the cosmos, of what exists. What they expressed allegorically are philosophical truths. Philosophical allegoresis interprets their expressions and finds philosophical tenets therein. Cornutus was strongly influenced by Chrysippus, Apollodorus of Athens, and Crates of Mallus, while Seneca, who was a Stoic but no allegorist, probably polemicised with Cornutus.Stoic allegoresis, as practiced by the Stoics Cornutus and Chaeremon roughly at the same time, later influenced not only the so-called Middle Platonists, but also the Christian Platonist Origen. Origen seems to have applied allegoresis not only to the Bible, like Philo and Clement before him, but also to Plato’s dialogues and myths. All these allegorisers aimed at finding deeper meanings and philosophical truths in traditional accounts, thereby rescuing them from accusations of superficiality or impiety. The goal was to find in ancient poets and other expressions of traditional religion, as well as in Scripture, meanings “worthy of the divine.” Remarkable structural similarities between the Stoic allegorical tradition inherited by Cornutus and Origen’s allegoresis will be pointed out.","PeriodicalId":40285,"journal":{"name":"Aitia-Regards sur la Culture Hellenistique au XXIe Siecle","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aitia-Regards sur la Culture Hellenistique au XXIe Siecle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/AITIA.2882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Roman Stoic Cornutus, who lived in the age of Nero, is the heir of an ancient and rich Stoic allegorical tradition applied to all aspects of traditional religion: literary myths, cultic epithets and attributes, and even iconographical representations of deities. Allegoresis (allegorical exegesis) was applied in antiquity to culturally and religiously authoritative texts. It was mainly practiced by “pagan” philosophers like Stoics and Middle and Neoplatonists and by philosophically minded Hellenistic Jewish and Christian exegetes, who read Scripture allegorically.Cornutus offers an excellent example of mythological allegoresis in his handbook of Greek theology. For each divinity, from Ouranos to Hades, Cornutus provides an allegorico-etymological interpretation of its names and epithets, its attributes, aspects of its myths and rituals, etc. Physical allegory (Zeus represents the ether, Hera the air, etc.) is prevalent, although there are also examples of ethical and historical exegeses. Special attention is demanded by Cornutus’ programmatic assertion—analysed below—that “The ancients were not people of no account, but they were also able to understand the nature of the cosmos and had the ability to philosophise on it by means of symbols and enigmata” (35). The ancient were nothing less than philosophers, since they were endowed with the understanding of the cosmos, of what exists. What they expressed allegorically are philosophical truths. Philosophical allegoresis interprets their expressions and finds philosophical tenets therein. Cornutus was strongly influenced by Chrysippus, Apollodorus of Athens, and Crates of Mallus, while Seneca, who was a Stoic but no allegorist, probably polemicised with Cornutus.Stoic allegoresis, as practiced by the Stoics Cornutus and Chaeremon roughly at the same time, later influenced not only the so-called Middle Platonists, but also the Christian Platonist Origen. Origen seems to have applied allegoresis not only to the Bible, like Philo and Clement before him, but also to Plato’s dialogues and myths. All these allegorisers aimed at finding deeper meanings and philosophical truths in traditional accounts, thereby rescuing them from accusations of superficiality or impiety. The goal was to find in ancient poets and other expressions of traditional religion, as well as in Scripture, meanings “worthy of the divine.” Remarkable structural similarities between the Stoic allegorical tradition inherited by Cornutus and Origen’s allegoresis will be pointed out.
安纽斯·科努图斯和斯多葛派的寓言传统:意义、来源和影响
罗马斯多葛派的科努图斯生活在尼禄时代,他继承了一种古老而丰富的斯多葛派寓言传统,这种寓言传统适用于传统宗教的各个方面:文学神话、崇拜的绰号和属性,甚至是神灵的图像表现。Allegoresis(寓言训诂)在古代被应用于文化和宗教权威文本。它主要是由“异教”哲学家,如斯多葛派、中柏拉图派和新柏拉图派,以及有哲学头脑的希腊化犹太和基督教注释家实践的,他们以寓言的方式阅读圣经。科努图斯在他的希腊神学手册中提供了一个神话寓言的极好例子。对于每一个神,从乌拉诺斯到哈迪斯,科努图斯都提供了一个寓言的词源解释,解释它的名字和绰号,它的属性,它的神话和仪式等方面。物理寓言(宙斯代表以太,赫拉代表空气等)是普遍存在的,尽管也有伦理和历史的例子。需要特别注意的是科努图斯的纲论性断言——下面进行分析——“古人不是无足轻重的人,但他们也能够理解宇宙的本质,并有能力通过符号和谜题对其进行哲学化的思考”(35)。古人不亚于哲学家,因为他们被赋予了对宇宙和存在的事物的理解。他们以寓言的方式表达的是哲学真理。哲学显喻法解释了他们的表达,并在其中找到了哲学原则。科努图斯深受克里西普斯、雅典的阿波罗多洛斯和马勒斯的克拉底的影响,而塞内加是斯多葛派,但不是寓言家,可能与科努图斯有过争论。斯多葛派的allegoresis,由斯多葛派的Cornutus和Chaeremon几乎同时实践,后来不仅影响了所谓的中柏拉图主义者,也影响了基督教柏拉图主义者奥利金。俄利根似乎不仅像在他之前的斐洛和克莱门特一样,在《圣经》中使用了暗指法,而且在柏拉图的对话和神话中也使用了暗指法。所有这些寓言者的目的都是在传统的叙述中寻找更深的意义和哲学真理,从而将它们从肤浅或不虔诚的指责中拯救出来。目的是在古代诗人和其他传统宗教的表达以及圣经中找到“值得神圣”的意义。本文将指出科努图斯所继承的斯多葛寓言传统与俄利根的寓言在结构上的显著相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书