Performance of three handheld NIR spectrometers for predicting grass silage quality

J. Pierna, P. Vermeulen, Nicolas Chamberland, V. Decruyenaere, E. Froidmont, O. Minet, B. Lecler, V. Baeten
{"title":"Performance of three handheld NIR spectrometers for predicting grass silage quality","authors":"J. Pierna, P. Vermeulen, Nicolas Chamberland, V. Decruyenaere, E. Froidmont, O. Minet, B. Lecler, V. Baeten","doi":"10.25518/1780-4507.19918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Description of the subject. Feed is the main variable cost in dairy farming. More efficient use of forage resources is one way to reduce production costs. Improving forage resource efficiency can start with a better assessment of the dry matter content and nutritional value of forages. Currently, analytical process time is often long and analyses are not repeatable while the quality of the fodder changes over time. Being able to analyze forages directly on-farm would make it possible to adapt the animal diet according to forage variability, in order to improve the profitability of the farm. Objectives. To propose in situ rapid analysis solutions to better characterize dry matter content and the chemical composition of fodder for assessing its feeding value. Method. The performance of three recently developed spectroscopic handheld devices, namely the Viavi’s MicroNIR 1700, the Ocean Insight’s FlameNIR and the Malvern Panalytical’s ASD FieldSpec 4, are evaluated to predict dry matter content and the chemical composition of fresh and unground grass silage in the framework of precision feeding and compared to the reference benchtop Foss’s XDS instrument. The conventional global PLS and local PLS are used as multivariate calibration methods. Results. The assessed handheld devices allow the dairy farmer to obtain a relatively precise quantitative prediction of the dry matter and crude fiber content (2.5% and 1.8% respectively on average, in terms of ratios between the local PLS error on fresh forage and the reference method error) in order to adapt the livestock diet. Crude protein, even if the prediction accuracy is lower (6.4%), is still well predicted. Higher errors are obtained for ash (9.2%), crude neutral (6.8%) and acid detergent fiber (6.9%). Conclusions. The studied devices should allow the dairy farmer to obtain a relatively precise quantitative prediction of those quality parameters in order to directly adapt the quantity of forage distributed to the animals. Performances could probably be improved by including more samples/spectra into the databases.","PeriodicalId":87455,"journal":{"name":"Skull base surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skull base surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.19918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Description of the subject. Feed is the main variable cost in dairy farming. More efficient use of forage resources is one way to reduce production costs. Improving forage resource efficiency can start with a better assessment of the dry matter content and nutritional value of forages. Currently, analytical process time is often long and analyses are not repeatable while the quality of the fodder changes over time. Being able to analyze forages directly on-farm would make it possible to adapt the animal diet according to forage variability, in order to improve the profitability of the farm. Objectives. To propose in situ rapid analysis solutions to better characterize dry matter content and the chemical composition of fodder for assessing its feeding value. Method. The performance of three recently developed spectroscopic handheld devices, namely the Viavi’s MicroNIR 1700, the Ocean Insight’s FlameNIR and the Malvern Panalytical’s ASD FieldSpec 4, are evaluated to predict dry matter content and the chemical composition of fresh and unground grass silage in the framework of precision feeding and compared to the reference benchtop Foss’s XDS instrument. The conventional global PLS and local PLS are used as multivariate calibration methods. Results. The assessed handheld devices allow the dairy farmer to obtain a relatively precise quantitative prediction of the dry matter and crude fiber content (2.5% and 1.8% respectively on average, in terms of ratios between the local PLS error on fresh forage and the reference method error) in order to adapt the livestock diet. Crude protein, even if the prediction accuracy is lower (6.4%), is still well predicted. Higher errors are obtained for ash (9.2%), crude neutral (6.8%) and acid detergent fiber (6.9%). Conclusions. The studied devices should allow the dairy farmer to obtain a relatively precise quantitative prediction of those quality parameters in order to directly adapt the quantity of forage distributed to the animals. Performances could probably be improved by including more samples/spectra into the databases.
三种手持式近红外光谱仪预测青贮牧草品质的性能
主题描述。饲料是奶牛养殖的主要可变成本。更有效地利用牧草资源是降低生产成本的途径之一。提高牧草资源利用效率可以从更好地评估牧草的干物质含量和营养价值入手。目前,分析过程时间往往很长,分析是不可重复的,而饲料的质量随着时间的推移而变化。能够在农场直接分析饲料将使根据饲料的变化来调整动物的饮食成为可能,从而提高农场的盈利能力。目标。提出原位快速分析方案,更好地表征饲料的干物质含量和化学成分,以评估饲料的饲用价值。方法。本文对最近开发的三种光谱手持设备(即Viavi的MicroNIR 1700、Ocean Insight的FlameNIR和Malvern Panalytical的ASD FieldSpec 4)的性能进行了评估,以预测在精确进料框架下新鲜和未磨草青饲料的干物质含量和化学成分,并与参考台式Foss的XDS仪器进行了比较。采用传统的全局PLS和局部PLS作为多变量标定方法。结果。评估的手持设备使奶农能够获得相对精确的干物质和粗纤维含量定量预测(根据新鲜饲料的本地PLS误差与参考方法误差之间的比率,平均分别为2.5%和1.8%),以便适应牲畜的饮食。尽管粗蛋白质的预测精度较低(6.4%),但仍然可以很好地预测。灰分(9.2%)、粗中性(6.8%)和酸性洗涤纤维(6.9%)的误差较大。结论。所研究的设备应该允许奶农获得这些质量参数的相对精确的定量预测,以便直接调整分配给动物的饲料数量。在数据库中加入更多的样本/光谱可能会提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信