Homoseksualumo atsiskleidimą aprašančių straipsnių komentarų turinio analizė

K. Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, Viktorija Gaidytė
{"title":"Homoseksualumo atsiskleidimą aprašančių straipsnių komentarų turinio analizė","authors":"K. Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, Viktorija Gaidytė","doi":"10.15388/Psichol.2018.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English] \nBoth researchers and society agree that those who decide to disclose their sexual orientation can find acceptance and even support in these experiences, while others are met with negative reactions, such as anger, rejection or bullying etc. There are lots of controversial studies about the differences in reactions to the coming out of homosexual men and women. It is agreed that these attitudes could be defined as multidimensional constructs comprised of cognitive, affective and behavioral components. A content analysis of comments on articles describing coming out of homosexual individuals has not been yet performed in Lithuania. \nThe aim of this study was to analyze the content of comments as reactions to the articles describing homosexuality disclosure in order to reveal the prevailing beliefs, emotions and behavioral reactions toward the disclosure of homosexuality and to compare any differences in responses while taking into account the sex of a disclosed person. \nA content analysis of 380 comments collected on the websites lrytas.lt and delfi.lt was carried out. The validity of the content categories was assessed with a second-rater procedure. The agreement percentage among the raters ranged from 84 to 100 and Cohen’s kappa from 0.42 to 1 throughout the categories. After the first evaluation of the content and after an objective selection of the comments for this research, 156 comments, which were suitable for further analysis, were selected. \nThe analysis has shown that commentators tend to have negative perceptions regarding the disclosure of a homosexual individual’s sexual orientation. In the comments of the articles describing homosexuality disclosure, it was most often expressed that homosexuality is an unnatural thing or a perversion; that homosexual people should not disclose their sexual orientation; that homosexual people should not be allowed to raise children. At the same time, any positive attitude was expressed rarely. The most prevailing positive attitude is the following: homosexual people are just as normal as heterosexual people. Negative emotions, such as anger or disgust, as well as homophobic bullying (offensive remarks, jokes and name-calling), were dominating in the comments. The accepting behavior (not encouraging someone to change), positive emotional reactions, such as support and suggestions to emigrate, were the rarest. The content analysis of the comments revealed the different reactions of the readers to homosexual men and women. The negative attitude toward raising children and the emotion of anger are more often addressed toward homosexual women than to homosexual men. \nThe results of this study indicate the prevailing negative attitude toward the public disclosure of the sexual orientation of homosexual persons.","PeriodicalId":33049,"journal":{"name":"Psichologija","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psichologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/Psichol.2018.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

[full article and abstract in Lithuanian; abstract in English] Both researchers and society agree that those who decide to disclose their sexual orientation can find acceptance and even support in these experiences, while others are met with negative reactions, such as anger, rejection or bullying etc. There are lots of controversial studies about the differences in reactions to the coming out of homosexual men and women. It is agreed that these attitudes could be defined as multidimensional constructs comprised of cognitive, affective and behavioral components. A content analysis of comments on articles describing coming out of homosexual individuals has not been yet performed in Lithuania. The aim of this study was to analyze the content of comments as reactions to the articles describing homosexuality disclosure in order to reveal the prevailing beliefs, emotions and behavioral reactions toward the disclosure of homosexuality and to compare any differences in responses while taking into account the sex of a disclosed person. A content analysis of 380 comments collected on the websites lrytas.lt and delfi.lt was carried out. The validity of the content categories was assessed with a second-rater procedure. The agreement percentage among the raters ranged from 84 to 100 and Cohen’s kappa from 0.42 to 1 throughout the categories. After the first evaluation of the content and after an objective selection of the comments for this research, 156 comments, which were suitable for further analysis, were selected. The analysis has shown that commentators tend to have negative perceptions regarding the disclosure of a homosexual individual’s sexual orientation. In the comments of the articles describing homosexuality disclosure, it was most often expressed that homosexuality is an unnatural thing or a perversion; that homosexual people should not disclose their sexual orientation; that homosexual people should not be allowed to raise children. At the same time, any positive attitude was expressed rarely. The most prevailing positive attitude is the following: homosexual people are just as normal as heterosexual people. Negative emotions, such as anger or disgust, as well as homophobic bullying (offensive remarks, jokes and name-calling), were dominating in the comments. The accepting behavior (not encouraging someone to change), positive emotional reactions, such as support and suggestions to emigrate, were the rarest. The content analysis of the comments revealed the different reactions of the readers to homosexual men and women. The negative attitude toward raising children and the emotion of anger are more often addressed toward homosexual women than to homosexual men. The results of this study indicate the prevailing negative attitude toward the public disclosure of the sexual orientation of homosexual persons.
[立陶宛文全文和摘要;研究人员和社会都认为,那些决定公开自己性取向的人可以在这些经历中得到接受甚至支持,而其他人则会遇到负面反应,如愤怒、拒绝或欺凌等。关于男女同性恋者对出柜反应的不同,有很多有争议的研究。人们一致认为,这些态度可以被定义为由认知、情感和行为组成的多维结构。立陶宛尚未对描述同性恋个体出柜的文章的评论进行内容分析。本研究的目的是分析评论内容作为对描述同性恋公开的文章的反应,以揭示对同性恋公开的普遍信念,情绪和行为反应,并在考虑到公开者的性别的情况下比较反应的差异。对这些网站上收集到的380条评论进行了内容分析。Lt和delfi。它被执行了。内容类别的有效性是用二流程序评估的。评分者之间的一致百分比在84到100之间,科恩的kappa在0.42到1之间。在对内容的第一次评估和对本研究的评论进行客观选择之后,选择了156条适合进一步分析的评论。分析表明,评论者对同性恋者性取向的公开倾向于持负面看法。在描述同性恋揭露的文章评论中,最常表达的是同性恋是一种不自然的东西或变态;同性恋者不应该公开自己的性取向;同性恋者不应该被允许抚养孩子。同时,很少有积极的态度被表达出来。最普遍的积极态度是:同性恋者和异性恋者一样正常。负面情绪,如愤怒或厌恶,以及同性恋欺凌(攻击性言论、笑话和辱骂),在评论中占主导地位。接受行为(不鼓励某人改变),积极的情绪反应,如支持和建议移民,是最罕见的。通过对评论内容的分析,可以看出读者对同性恋男女的不同反应。对抚养孩子的消极态度和愤怒情绪更多是针对女同性恋者而不是男同性恋者。本研究结果显示,公众对同性恋者公开性倾向持否定态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信