M. P. Bardon, I. Said-Huntingford, Christopher Zammit, Sharon Psaila Balzan, G. Saliba, S. Montefort, D. Bilocca
{"title":"Endobronchial ultrasound trans-bronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in Malta – improving diagnostic yield in a low volume centre","authors":"M. P. Bardon, I. Said-Huntingford, Christopher Zammit, Sharon Psaila Balzan, G. Saliba, S. Montefort, D. Bilocca","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EBUS-TBNA at Mater Dei Hospital (MDH), which serves a population of about 432000, was audited over a 2 year period. Our aim was to assess results obtained and factors associated with improved diagnostic yield. All patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA at MDH were included and data was collected retrospectively. 71 EBUS TBNA procedures were performed on 70 patients. Sensitivity for malignancy was 93% (40/43) and sensitivity for granulomatous disease was 72% (16/22). The overall diagnostic sensitivity was 84.5% (60/71). Sampling multiple stations as opposed to a single station was associated with a better histology diagnostic yield (90.3% vs 60% p=0.004) as well as a better yield on cytology (83.9% vs 50% p=0.003). It also led to an improved overall combined diagnostic yield (93.5% vs 77.5%) although this narrowly missed statistical significance (p=0.06). Targeting multiple stations also correlated with obtaining an adequate histology sample (96.8% vs 82.5% p=0.05). This effect was even more pronounced for granulomatous disease with improved diagnostic histology yield (100% vs 43.8% p=0.005) diagnostic cytology yield (89% vs 25% p=0.002) and overall combined diagnostic yield (100% vs 62.5% p=0.035) Increasing lesion size was predictive of obtaining an adequate tissue sample (p=0.03) histology diagnostic yield (p=0.05) and overall diagnostic yield (p=0.04) but there was no correlation between lesion size and yield on cytology (p=0.389). Sampling multiple stations and targeting larger lesions led to an improved diagnostic yield; the effect of targeting multiple stations was even more pronounced in granulomatous disease.","PeriodicalId":93455,"journal":{"name":"Interventional pulmonology (Middletown, Del.)","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional pulmonology (Middletown, Del.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
EBUS-TBNA at Mater Dei Hospital (MDH), which serves a population of about 432000, was audited over a 2 year period. Our aim was to assess results obtained and factors associated with improved diagnostic yield. All patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA at MDH were included and data was collected retrospectively. 71 EBUS TBNA procedures were performed on 70 patients. Sensitivity for malignancy was 93% (40/43) and sensitivity for granulomatous disease was 72% (16/22). The overall diagnostic sensitivity was 84.5% (60/71). Sampling multiple stations as opposed to a single station was associated with a better histology diagnostic yield (90.3% vs 60% p=0.004) as well as a better yield on cytology (83.9% vs 50% p=0.003). It also led to an improved overall combined diagnostic yield (93.5% vs 77.5%) although this narrowly missed statistical significance (p=0.06). Targeting multiple stations also correlated with obtaining an adequate histology sample (96.8% vs 82.5% p=0.05). This effect was even more pronounced for granulomatous disease with improved diagnostic histology yield (100% vs 43.8% p=0.005) diagnostic cytology yield (89% vs 25% p=0.002) and overall combined diagnostic yield (100% vs 62.5% p=0.035) Increasing lesion size was predictive of obtaining an adequate tissue sample (p=0.03) histology diagnostic yield (p=0.05) and overall diagnostic yield (p=0.04) but there was no correlation between lesion size and yield on cytology (p=0.389). Sampling multiple stations and targeting larger lesions led to an improved diagnostic yield; the effect of targeting multiple stations was even more pronounced in granulomatous disease.
Mater Dei医院(MDH)的EBUS-TBNA在2年的时间里接受了审计,该医院为大约432000人提供服务。我们的目的是评估获得的结果和与提高诊断率相关的因素。所有在MDH接受EBUS-TBNA的患者均被纳入,并回顾性收集数据。70例患者行71例EBUS TBNA手术。恶性肿瘤的敏感性为93%(40/43),肉芽肿性疾病的敏感性为72%(16/22)。总体诊断敏感性为84.5%(60/71)。与单站取样相比,多站取样具有更好的组织学诊断率(90.3% vs 60% p=0.004)和细胞学诊断率(83.9% vs 50% p=0.003)。它也导致了总体联合诊断率的提高(93.5% vs 77.5%),尽管这与统计学意义相差甚远(p=0.06)。靶向多个站点也与获得足够的组织学样本相关(96.8% vs 82.5% p=0.05)。这种效果在肉芽肿性疾病中更为明显,组织学诊断率(100% vs 43.8% p=0.005)、细胞学诊断率(89% vs 25% p=0.002)和总体综合诊断率(100% vs 62.5% p=0.035)提高病变大小预示着获得足够的组织样本(p=0.03)、组织学诊断率(p=0.05)和总体诊断率(p=0.04),但病变大小和细胞学诊断率之间没有相关性(p=0.389)。采样多个站点和针对更大的病变导致提高诊断率;针对多个站点的效果在肉芽肿疾病中更为明显。