Dose and dose-rate effectiveness of radiation: first objectivity then conclusions -

Sergei V. Jargin
{"title":"Dose and dose-rate effectiveness of radiation: first objectivity then conclusions -","authors":"Sergei V. Jargin","doi":"10.5455/JEOS.20160412075846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter comments on the ongoing re-evaluation of the dose and dose rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) equal to 2.0, currently recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. The topics of DDREF and threshold are related to the linear no-threshold theory (LNT), which does not take into account that DNA damage and repair are in dynamic equilibrium probably reached in a long term. Living organisms must have been adapted by natural selection to the today’s background level of radiation or to some average from the past, when the radiation background was higher. Dosedependent self-selection of exposed people and other biases common in epidemiological studies, cited in support of the DDREF lowering, are discussed here. In conclusion, the LNT and under-estimation of DDREF tend to exaggerate radiationrelated health risks at low dose and dose rates exposures. Future risk estimates should be based on direct comparisons of experimental data from acute and protracted exposures.","PeriodicalId":16086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"25-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JEOS.20160412075846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This letter comments on the ongoing re-evaluation of the dose and dose rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) equal to 2.0, currently recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. The topics of DDREF and threshold are related to the linear no-threshold theory (LNT), which does not take into account that DNA damage and repair are in dynamic equilibrium probably reached in a long term. Living organisms must have been adapted by natural selection to the today’s background level of radiation or to some average from the past, when the radiation background was higher. Dosedependent self-selection of exposed people and other biases common in epidemiological studies, cited in support of the DDREF lowering, are discussed here. In conclusion, the LNT and under-estimation of DDREF tend to exaggerate radiationrelated health risks at low dose and dose rates exposures. Future risk estimates should be based on direct comparisons of experimental data from acute and protracted exposures.
辐射剂量与剂量率效应:先客观后结论
这封信评论了目前正在进行的剂量和剂量率有效系数等于2.0的重新评估,这是国际放射防护委员会目前建议的。DDREF和阈值的主题与线性无阈值理论(LNT)有关,该理论没有考虑到DNA损伤和修复可能在长期内达到动态平衡。生物一定是通过自然选择适应了今天的背景辐射水平,或者适应了过去辐射背景更高时的某种平均水平。本文讨论了支持降低DDREF的流行病学研究中常见的剂量依赖性暴露者自我选择和其他偏见。总之,LNT和对DDREF的低估往往会夸大低剂量和低剂量率照射下与辐射有关的健康风险。未来的风险估计应基于急性暴露和长期暴露的实验数据的直接比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信