Clinical validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors in dried matrix on paper discs

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Ignacio Guillermo Bressán , María Isabel Giménez , Susana Francisca Llesuy
{"title":"Clinical validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors in dried matrix on paper discs","authors":"Ignacio Guillermo Bressán ,&nbsp;María Isabel Giménez ,&nbsp;Susana Francisca Llesuy","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2022.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Advances in liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) have enabled the quantification of immunosuppressants using microsampling techniques. In this context, dried matrix on paper discs (DMPD) could be a useful alternative to conventional venipuncture. Although analytical validation is necessary to establish the suitability of method performance, it is not sufficient to proceed with its implementation into routine clinical practice. Also necessary is that equivalence between sampling methods be demonstrated in a clinical validation study.</p></div><div><h3>Objetives</h3><p>To clinically validate a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and cyclosporin A using DMPD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>According to the recommendations of international guidelines, at least 40 whole blood (WB) and DMPD paired samples for each analyte were collected by skilled technicians and analyzed using LC-MS/MS. Results were evaluated in terms of statistical agreement and bias values at medical decision points.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For all analytes, Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed that confidence intervals (CIs) for slopes and intercepts included 1 and 0, respectively. It also showed that biases at medical decision points were not clinically relevant. No statistically significant differences between DMPD and WB were found using difference plots and agreement analysis. In this regard, CIs for bias estimators included 0, and more than 95% of the results fell within the limits of agreement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The feasibility of the clinical application of simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and cyclosporin A in DMPD was demonstrated. Results showed that this microsampling technique is interchangeable with conventional WB sampling when specimens are collected by trained personnel.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X22000177/pdfft?md5=1bfb6b7c19afa801057c5b82bc6a4d1e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667145X22000177-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X22000177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

Advances in liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) have enabled the quantification of immunosuppressants using microsampling techniques. In this context, dried matrix on paper discs (DMPD) could be a useful alternative to conventional venipuncture. Although analytical validation is necessary to establish the suitability of method performance, it is not sufficient to proceed with its implementation into routine clinical practice. Also necessary is that equivalence between sampling methods be demonstrated in a clinical validation study.

Objetives

To clinically validate a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and cyclosporin A using DMPD.

Methods

According to the recommendations of international guidelines, at least 40 whole blood (WB) and DMPD paired samples for each analyte were collected by skilled technicians and analyzed using LC-MS/MS. Results were evaluated in terms of statistical agreement and bias values at medical decision points.

Results

For all analytes, Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed that confidence intervals (CIs) for slopes and intercepts included 1 and 0, respectively. It also showed that biases at medical decision points were not clinically relevant. No statistically significant differences between DMPD and WB were found using difference plots and agreement analysis. In this regard, CIs for bias estimators included 0, and more than 95% of the results fell within the limits of agreement.

Conclusion

The feasibility of the clinical application of simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus and cyclosporin A in DMPD was demonstrated. Results showed that this microsampling technique is interchangeable with conventional WB sampling when specimens are collected by trained personnel.

Abstract Image

液相色谱-串联质谱法定量纸盘上干燥基质中钙调磷酸酶和mTOR抑制剂的临床验证
液相色谱耦合串联质谱(LC-MS /MS)的进步使得使用微采样技术定量免疫抑制剂成为可能。在这种情况下,干燥的纸盘基质(DMPD)可能是传统静脉穿刺的有用替代方法。虽然分析验证对于建立方法性能的适用性是必要的,但这不足以将其应用于常规临床实践。同样有必要的是,在临床验证研究中证明取样方法之间的等效性。目的建立定量分析他克莫司、西罗莫司、依维莫司和环孢素a的LC-MS/MS方法。方法按照国际指南的建议,由熟练的技术人员采集每种分析物至少40份全血(WB)和DMPD配对样本,采用LC-MS/MS进行分析。根据医疗决策点的统计一致性和偏倚值对结果进行评估。结果对于所有分析物,Passing-Bablok回归分析显示斜率和截距的置信区间(ci)分别为1和0。它还表明,在医疗决策点上的偏见与临床无关。采用差异图和一致性分析,DMPD与WB无统计学差异。在这方面,偏倚估计者的ci包括0,超过95%的结果落在一致的范围内。结论同时定量他克莫司、西罗莫司、依维莫司和环孢素A在DMPD中的应用是可行的。结果表明,当由训练有素的人员采集标本时,这种微采样技术与传统的WB采样技术是可互换的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信