Aspects of Clinical Utility of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List after Burns.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Helma W C Hofland, Anneke van de Steenoven, Nancy E E Van Loey
{"title":"Aspects of Clinical Utility of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List after Burns.","authors":"Helma W C Hofland, Anneke van de Steenoven, Nancy E E Van Loey","doi":"10.3390/ebj3020027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn survivors may benefit from screening for a broad area of problems to improve communication and inform referral needs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate clinical utility aspects such as appropriateness and acceptability to clinicians and completers of an existing, frequently used screening instrument in oncological populations, the Distress Thermometer and Problem List (DT and PL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paediatric and adult patients visiting the outpatient clinic after admission to the burn centre were invited to complete the instrument. The DT and (problem domains of) the PL were related and compared to the need to discuss the reported problems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 160 patients were invited to complete the DT and PL, of which 139 agreed. The study shows evidence for appropriateness and high acceptability to clinicians and completers, although the effectiveness of the PL may be lower compared to the DT and needs adaptation to better meet the burn survivors' situation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of a screening instrument in the outpatient clinic environment has shown to be appropriate and acceptable and informs clinical practice to identify supportive needs in patients with burns. However, the PL needs to be adapted to the situation of the burn survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"320-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3020027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burn survivors may benefit from screening for a broad area of problems to improve communication and inform referral needs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate clinical utility aspects such as appropriateness and acceptability to clinicians and completers of an existing, frequently used screening instrument in oncological populations, the Distress Thermometer and Problem List (DT and PL).

Methods: Paediatric and adult patients visiting the outpatient clinic after admission to the burn centre were invited to complete the instrument. The DT and (problem domains of) the PL were related and compared to the need to discuss the reported problems.

Results: A total of 160 patients were invited to complete the DT and PL, of which 139 agreed. The study shows evidence for appropriateness and high acceptability to clinicians and completers, although the effectiveness of the PL may be lower compared to the DT and needs adaptation to better meet the burn survivors' situation.

Discussion: The use of a screening instrument in the outpatient clinic environment has shown to be appropriate and acceptable and informs clinical practice to identify supportive needs in patients with burns. However, the PL needs to be adapted to the situation of the burn survivors.

烧伤后痛苦温度计和问题清单的临床实用性。
对烧伤幸存者进行广泛的问题筛查可以改善沟通并了解转诊需求。因此,本研究旨在调查临床实用性方面的问题,如临床医生和完成者对现有的、在肿瘤人群中经常使用的筛查工具--痛苦温度计和问题清单(DT 和 PL)--的适宜性和可接受性:方法:邀请在烧伤中心住院后到门诊就诊的儿童和成人患者填写该工具。方法:邀请在烧伤中心住院后前往门诊就诊的儿童和成人患者填写问卷,并将 DT 和 PL 的(问题域)与需要讨论报告的问题进行比较:共有 160 名患者受邀填写了 DT 和 PL,其中 139 人同意填写。研究结果表明,尽管 PL 的有效性可能低于 DT,并且需要进行调整以更好地满足烧伤幸存者的情况,但临床医生和完成者对 PL 的适当性和可接受性较高:讨论:在门诊环境中使用筛查工具已被证明是适当和可接受的,并能为临床实践提供信息,以确定烧伤患者的支持性需求。然而,PL 需要根据烧伤幸存者的情况进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信