Post place and route design-technology co-optimization for scaling at single-digit nodes with constant ground rules

IF 1.5 2区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
L. Mattii, D. Milojevic, P. Debacker, Mladen Berekovic, S. M. Y. Sherazi, B. Chava, M. Bardon, P. Schuddinck, D. Rodopoulos, R. Baert, V. Gerousis, J. Ryckaert, P. Raghavan
{"title":"Post place and route design-technology co-optimization for scaling at single-digit nodes with constant ground rules","authors":"L. Mattii, D. Milojevic, P. Debacker, Mladen Berekovic, S. M. Y. Sherazi, B. Chava, M. Bardon, P. Schuddinck, D. Rodopoulos, R. Baert, V. Gerousis, J. Ryckaert, P. Raghavan","doi":"10.1117/1.JMM.17.1.013503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Standard-cell design, technology choices, and place and route (P&R) efficiency are deeply interrelated in CMOS technology nodes below 10 nm, where lower number of tracks cells and higher pin densities pose increasingly challenging problems to the router in terms of congestion and pin accessibility. To evaluate and downselect the best solutions, a holistic design-technology co-optimization approach leveraging state-of-the-art P&R tools is thus necessary. We adopt such an approach using the imec N7 technology platform, with contacted poly pitch of 42 nm and tightest metal pitch of 32 nm, by comparing post P&R area of an IP block for different standard cell configurations, technology options, and cell height. Keeping the technology node and the set of ground rules unchanged, we demonstrate that a careful combination of these solutions can enable area gains of up to 50%, comparable with the area benefits of migrating to another node. We further demonstrate that these area benefits can be achieved at isoperformance with >20% reduced power. As at the end of the CMOS roadmap, conventional scaling enacted through pitch reduction is made more and more challenging by constraints imposed by lithography limits, material resistivity, manufacturability, and ultimately wafer cost, the approach shown herein offers a valid, attractive, and low-cost alternative.","PeriodicalId":16522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.17.1.013503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. Standard-cell design, technology choices, and place and route (P&R) efficiency are deeply interrelated in CMOS technology nodes below 10 nm, where lower number of tracks cells and higher pin densities pose increasingly challenging problems to the router in terms of congestion and pin accessibility. To evaluate and downselect the best solutions, a holistic design-technology co-optimization approach leveraging state-of-the-art P&R tools is thus necessary. We adopt such an approach using the imec N7 technology platform, with contacted poly pitch of 42 nm and tightest metal pitch of 32 nm, by comparing post P&R area of an IP block for different standard cell configurations, technology options, and cell height. Keeping the technology node and the set of ground rules unchanged, we demonstrate that a careful combination of these solutions can enable area gains of up to 50%, comparable with the area benefits of migrating to another node. We further demonstrate that these area benefits can be achieved at isoperformance with >20% reduced power. As at the end of the CMOS roadmap, conventional scaling enacted through pitch reduction is made more and more challenging by constraints imposed by lithography limits, material resistivity, manufacturability, and ultimately wafer cost, the approach shown herein offers a valid, attractive, and low-cost alternative.
驿站位置和路线设计-基于恒定基本规则的个位数节点缩放技术协同优化
摘要在10nm以下的CMOS技术节点中,标准单元设计、技术选择以及位置和路由(P&R)效率是密切相关的,在10nm以下的CMOS技术节点中,更少的轨道单元数量和更高的引脚密度对路由器的拥塞和引脚可及性提出了越来越具有挑战性的问题。为了评估和选择最佳解决方案,利用最先进的P&R工具,整体设计技术协同优化方法是必要的。我们采用imec N7技术平台,采用42 nm的接触聚节距和32 nm的最紧金属节距,通过比较不同标准电池配置、技术选项和电池高度下IP块的P&R后面积,采用这种方法。在保持技术节点和基本规则不变的情况下,我们证明了这些解决方案的精心组合可以使面积收益高达50%,与迁移到另一个节点的面积收益相当。我们进一步证明,这些面积优势可以在同等性能下实现,功耗降低20%。在CMOS路线图的最后,由于光刻限制、材料电阻率、可制造性和最终晶圆成本的限制,通过减小螺距实现的传统缩放越来越具有挑战性,本文所示的方法提供了一种有效、有吸引力且低成本的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
30.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信