Knowledge exchange systems for youth health and chronic disease prevention: a tri-provincial case study.

D. Murnaghan, William Morrison, E. J. Griffith, Brandi Bell, L. A. Duffley, K. Mcgarry, Steve Manske
{"title":"Knowledge exchange systems for youth health and chronic disease prevention: a tri-provincial case study.","authors":"D. Murnaghan, William Morrison, E. J. Griffith, Brandi Bell, L. A. Duffley, K. Mcgarry, Steve Manske","doi":"10.24095/HPCDP.33.4.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe research teams undertook a case study design using a common analytical framework to investigate three provincial (Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Manitoba) knowledge exchange systems. These three knowledge exchange systems seek to generate and enhance the use of evidence in policy development, program planning and evaluation to improve youth health and chronic disease prevention.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe applied a case study design to explore the lessons learned, that is, key conditions or processes contributing to the development of knowledge exchange capacity, using a multi-data collection method to gain an in-depth understanding. Data management, synthesis and analysis activities were concurrent, iterative and ongoing. The lessons learned were organized into seven \"clusters.\"\n\n\nRESULTS\nKey findings demonstrated that knowledge exchange is a complex process requiring champions, collaborative partnerships, regional readiness and the adaptation of knowledge exchange to diverse stakeholders.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nOverall, knowledge exchange systems can increase the capacity to exchange and use evidence by moving beyond collecting and reporting data. Areas of influence included development of new partnerships, expanded knowledge-sharing activities, and refinement of policy and practice approaches related to youth health and chronic disease prevention.","PeriodicalId":50696,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","volume":"4 1","pages":"257-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24095/HPCDP.33.4.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The research teams undertook a case study design using a common analytical framework to investigate three provincial (Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Manitoba) knowledge exchange systems. These three knowledge exchange systems seek to generate and enhance the use of evidence in policy development, program planning and evaluation to improve youth health and chronic disease prevention. METHODS We applied a case study design to explore the lessons learned, that is, key conditions or processes contributing to the development of knowledge exchange capacity, using a multi-data collection method to gain an in-depth understanding. Data management, synthesis and analysis activities were concurrent, iterative and ongoing. The lessons learned were organized into seven "clusters." RESULTS Key findings demonstrated that knowledge exchange is a complex process requiring champions, collaborative partnerships, regional readiness and the adaptation of knowledge exchange to diverse stakeholders. DISCUSSION Overall, knowledge exchange systems can increase the capacity to exchange and use evidence by moving beyond collecting and reporting data. Areas of influence included development of new partnerships, expanded knowledge-sharing activities, and refinement of policy and practice approaches related to youth health and chronic disease prevention.
青少年健康和慢性疾病预防的知识交流系统:一个三省案例研究。
研究小组采用通用分析框架进行了案例研究设计,调查了三个省(爱德华王子岛、新不伦瑞克省和马尼托巴省)的知识交流系统。这三个知识交流系统力求在政策制定、方案规划和评价方面产生和加强证据的使用,以改善青年健康和慢性病预防。方法采用案例研究设计,通过多数据收集方法,深入了解知识交流能力发展的关键条件或过程,探讨经验教训。数据管理、综合和分析活动是并行的、迭代的和持续的。吸取的教训被分成七个“组”。主要研究结果表明,知识交流是一个复杂的过程,需要倡导者、合作伙伴关系、区域准备以及知识交流对不同利益相关者的适应。总的来说,知识交换系统可以通过超越收集和报告数据来提高交换和使用证据的能力。影响领域包括发展新的伙伴关系、扩大知识分享活动以及改进与青年健康和慢性病预防有关的政策和做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信