Defoliation impacts on Festuca campestris (Rydb.) plants exposed to wildfire

A. D. Bogen, E. Bork, W. Willms
{"title":"Defoliation impacts on Festuca campestris (Rydb.) plants exposed to wildfire","authors":"A. D. Bogen, E. Bork, W. Willms","doi":"10.2307/4004042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wildfires commonly occur in the Fescue Prairie of Alberta, but little information exists to provide a basis for making grazing recommendations after burning. A wildfire in April 1999 provided an opportunity to study the effect of season and intensity of post-burn defoliation on foothills rough fescue (F. campestris Rydb.) in southwestern Alberta. A 3 (date of defoliation) x 2 (defoliation intensity) factorial experiment with 10 replicates (plants) was established in both a burned and a non-burned grassland and analyzed as a nested design. Plants were defoliated once during active vegetative growth (17 May), inflorescence development (2 July), or dormancy (30 September), at either 5 or 15-cm clipped stubble heights in the first growing season after fire. Burning increased tiller numbers by 54% compared to non-burned plants but reduced plant ANPP by 51% in the second growing season. While a single defoliation of burned plants, particularly early in the year, had little effect on growth, delaying defoliation into July decreased tillers 1 year later. Increasing defoliation intensity had the greatest impact on non-burned plants, reducing plant height (15%) as well as tiller (21%) and plant (32%) ANPP in the second year. May defoliation reduced etiolated growth 1 year later regardless of burn treatment. A single grazing event after wildfire does not necessarily appear to detrimentally affect rough fescue; however, the low herbage available immediately after fire may not justify the increased risk to the plant with subsequent grazing. DOI:10.2458/azu_jrm_v56i4_bogen","PeriodicalId":16918,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Range Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Range Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4004042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Wildfires commonly occur in the Fescue Prairie of Alberta, but little information exists to provide a basis for making grazing recommendations after burning. A wildfire in April 1999 provided an opportunity to study the effect of season and intensity of post-burn defoliation on foothills rough fescue (F. campestris Rydb.) in southwestern Alberta. A 3 (date of defoliation) x 2 (defoliation intensity) factorial experiment with 10 replicates (plants) was established in both a burned and a non-burned grassland and analyzed as a nested design. Plants were defoliated once during active vegetative growth (17 May), inflorescence development (2 July), or dormancy (30 September), at either 5 or 15-cm clipped stubble heights in the first growing season after fire. Burning increased tiller numbers by 54% compared to non-burned plants but reduced plant ANPP by 51% in the second growing season. While a single defoliation of burned plants, particularly early in the year, had little effect on growth, delaying defoliation into July decreased tillers 1 year later. Increasing defoliation intensity had the greatest impact on non-burned plants, reducing plant height (15%) as well as tiller (21%) and plant (32%) ANPP in the second year. May defoliation reduced etiolated growth 1 year later regardless of burn treatment. A single grazing event after wildfire does not necessarily appear to detrimentally affect rough fescue; however, the low herbage available immediately after fire may not justify the increased risk to the plant with subsequent grazing. DOI:10.2458/azu_jrm_v56i4_bogen
野火对羊茅落叶的影响
野火通常发生在阿尔伯塔省的羊茅草原,但很少有信息可以为燃烧后的放牧建议提供依据。1999年4月的一场野火为研究艾伯塔省西南部丘陵粗糙羊茅(F. campestris Rydb.)燃烧后落叶的季节和强度的影响提供了机会。建立了一个3(落叶日期)× 2(落叶强度)的因子试验,在烧毁和未烧毁的草地上进行10个重复(植物),并进行巢式设计分析。在火灾后的第一个生长季节,植物在营养生长期(5月17日)、花序发育(7月2日)或休眠期(9月30日)在修剪后5或15厘米的残茬高度上落叶一次。与未燃烧植株相比,燃烧植株的分蘖数增加了54%,但在第二个生长季节使植株的ANPP减少了51%。而焚烧植株的单次落叶,特别是在年初,对生长影响不大,延迟到7月的落叶减少了1年后的分蘖数。增加落叶强度对未烧苗的影响最大,第二年株高降低15%,分蘖降低21%,植株ANPP降低32%。不论烧伤治疗与否,1年后落叶可减少黄化生长。野火后的一次放牧并不一定会对粗糙的羊茅产生不利影响;然而,火灾后立即获得的牧草较少,可能不能证明随后放牧对植物增加的风险是合理的。DOI: 10.2458 / azu_jrm_v56i4_bogen
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信