Prosecutor's Demand In Delimination Form Of Children's Independence As A Form Of Legal Protection

Q2 Social Sciences
S. Suhardjono, Siti Ummu Adillah
{"title":"Prosecutor's Demand In Delimination Form Of Children's Independence As A Form Of Legal Protection","authors":"S. Suhardjono, Siti Ummu Adillah","doi":"10.30659/LDJ.3.2.%P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the effectiveness of stopping prosecutions based on restorative justice. To find out and analyze the process of discontinuing prosecution for termination based on restorative justice in terms of the principles of restorative justice. The approach method used in this research is a sociological juridical method (Sociological Research).Based on the results of this study it was concluded that effectiveness of the termination of prosecution based on Restorative Justice is carried out by taking into account the interests of the victims and other protected legal interests; avoidance of negative stigma; avoidance of retaliation; community response and harmony; and propriety, decency, and public order. The process of discontinuing prosecution based on restorative justice has met the requirements of the principle of restorative justice, namely that the Public Prosecutor offers peace efforts to Victims and Suspects. The Public Prosecutor shall summon the Victim legally and appropriately by stating the reason for the summons. In the event that it is deemed necessary, peace efforts may involve the families of the Victim/Suspect, community leaders or representatives, and other related parties. The Public Prosecutor shall notify the aims and objectives as well as the rights and obligations of the Victims and Suspects in peace efforts, including the right to refuse peace efforts. In the event that the peace effort is accepted by the Victim and the Suspect, the peace process will be continued.","PeriodicalId":55646,"journal":{"name":"Law Environment and Development Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Environment and Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/LDJ.3.2.%P","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the effectiveness of stopping prosecutions based on restorative justice. To find out and analyze the process of discontinuing prosecution for termination based on restorative justice in terms of the principles of restorative justice. The approach method used in this research is a sociological juridical method (Sociological Research).Based on the results of this study it was concluded that effectiveness of the termination of prosecution based on Restorative Justice is carried out by taking into account the interests of the victims and other protected legal interests; avoidance of negative stigma; avoidance of retaliation; community response and harmony; and propriety, decency, and public order. The process of discontinuing prosecution based on restorative justice has met the requirements of the principle of restorative justice, namely that the Public Prosecutor offers peace efforts to Victims and Suspects. The Public Prosecutor shall summon the Victim legally and appropriately by stating the reason for the summons. In the event that it is deemed necessary, peace efforts may involve the families of the Victim/Suspect, community leaders or representatives, and other related parties. The Public Prosecutor shall notify the aims and objectives as well as the rights and obligations of the Victims and Suspects in peace efforts, including the right to refuse peace efforts. In the event that the peace effort is accepted by the Victim and the Suspect, the peace process will be continued.
儿童独立作为一种法律保护形式的界定形式中的公诉人要求
本研究的目的是查明和分析检察官关于剥夺儿童自由的要求是否适当地适用于对儿童的法律保护,特别是在儿童对儿童犯下的性犯罪方面。本研究所采用的方法是实证法学,而本研究的规范是描述性分析,即描述与法律理论相关的法律法规在实施成文法的实践中所涉及的问题。所获得的结果是,从法律目标的角度来看,检察官以正式剥夺自由的形式提出的要求符合2012年关于少年刑事司法制度的第11号法,此外,从社会学和哲学的角度来看,这与受害者的孩子在面对未来时所经历的创伤和痛苦相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信