Comparison of measured and computed local electric field distributions due to vehicle-mounted antennas using 2D feature selective validation

A.J.M. Martin, A. Ruddle, A. Duffy
{"title":"Comparison of measured and computed local electric field distributions due to vehicle-mounted antennas using 2D feature selective validation","authors":"A.J.M. Martin, A. Ruddle, A. Duffy","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.2005.1513516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper outlines the results of a validation study based on simulated and measured data obtained for the electric field in the vicinity of a vehicle equipped with a roof-mounted monopole antenna. Evaluations based on simple statistics and a 2D feature selective validation (FSV) analysis are presented. Statistical differences between the measurements and simulations are found be better than /spl plusmn/3 dB (which is also the estimated uncertainty of the measurements) for more than 83% of the sampling points, depending on the measurement plane. These conclusions are also supported by the 2D FSV analysis. Taking account of measurement uncertainties, results are judged to be \"ideal\", in terms of the similarities between the amplitudes of the normalized spatial field distributions, and \"very good\" in terms of the similarities between the shape and locations of features. The study confirms that satisfactory accuracy can be gained in the prediction of field distributions due to vehicle mounted antennas. Using the 2D FSV approach, comparisons between the two antenna configurations are more similar than statistical measures, which are based on amplitude alone, would suggest.","PeriodicalId":6459,"journal":{"name":"2005 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2005. EMC 2005.","volume":"18 1","pages":"290-295 Vol. 1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2005. EMC 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2005.1513516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper outlines the results of a validation study based on simulated and measured data obtained for the electric field in the vicinity of a vehicle equipped with a roof-mounted monopole antenna. Evaluations based on simple statistics and a 2D feature selective validation (FSV) analysis are presented. Statistical differences between the measurements and simulations are found be better than /spl plusmn/3 dB (which is also the estimated uncertainty of the measurements) for more than 83% of the sampling points, depending on the measurement plane. These conclusions are also supported by the 2D FSV analysis. Taking account of measurement uncertainties, results are judged to be "ideal", in terms of the similarities between the amplitudes of the normalized spatial field distributions, and "very good" in terms of the similarities between the shape and locations of features. The study confirms that satisfactory accuracy can be gained in the prediction of field distributions due to vehicle mounted antennas. Using the 2D FSV approach, comparisons between the two antenna configurations are more similar than statistical measures, which are based on amplitude alone, would suggest.
使用二维特征选择验证的车载天线局部电场分布的测量和计算比较
本文概述了一项基于模拟和测量数据的验证研究的结果,该研究获得了安装了车顶单极子天线的车辆附近的电场。提出了基于简单统计和二维特征选择验证(FSV)分析的评价方法。根据测量平面的不同,在超过83%的采样点上,测量值与模拟值之间的统计差异优于/spl + usmn/ 3db(这也是测量值的估计不确定度)。这些结论也得到了二维FSV分析的支持。考虑到测量的不确定性,就归一化空间场分布的幅值之间的相似性而言,结果被判定为“理想”,就特征的形状和位置之间的相似性而言,结果被判定为“非常好”。研究证实了车载天线对场分布的预测可以获得满意的精度。使用二维FSV方法,两种天线配置之间的比较比仅基于幅度的统计测量更相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信