Magnetic resonance imaging for vestibular schwannoma: cost-effective protocol for referrals.

B. Mettias, M. Lyons
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging for vestibular schwannoma: cost-effective protocol for referrals.","authors":"B. Mettias, M. Lyons","doi":"10.1017/S0022215119001981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nVestibular schwannoma is the most common neoplasm in the cerebellopontine angle, and fast spin-echo T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is the most sensitive test for diagnosing it. This study evaluated the financial and time costs of unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging referrals before and after the application of a magnetic resonance imaging protocol.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA full audit cycle was used for the assessment. The first cycle in January 2012 was retrospective and evaluated the financial impact of current selection criteria for magnetic resonance imaging referral against standard guidelines. The second cycle in January 2014 was prospective after implementation of the protocol.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were 46 and 112 patients who had magnetic resonance imaging during first and second cycle, respectively. Of the referrals for magnetic resonance imaging, 65 per cent versus 81 per cent of the referrals were appropriate in the first and second cycles, respectively. The relative risk was reduced from 0.5 to 0.2. The waiting times for magnetic resonance imaging scans improved.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nSelection criteria for magnetic resonance imaging referral are important in reducing waiting times for scans, patient anxiety and conserving trust resources.","PeriodicalId":76651,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119001981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Vestibular schwannoma is the most common neoplasm in the cerebellopontine angle, and fast spin-echo T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is the most sensitive test for diagnosing it. This study evaluated the financial and time costs of unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging referrals before and after the application of a magnetic resonance imaging protocol. METHOD A full audit cycle was used for the assessment. The first cycle in January 2012 was retrospective and evaluated the financial impact of current selection criteria for magnetic resonance imaging referral against standard guidelines. The second cycle in January 2014 was prospective after implementation of the protocol. RESULTS There were 46 and 112 patients who had magnetic resonance imaging during first and second cycle, respectively. Of the referrals for magnetic resonance imaging, 65 per cent versus 81 per cent of the referrals were appropriate in the first and second cycles, respectively. The relative risk was reduced from 0.5 to 0.2. The waiting times for magnetic resonance imaging scans improved. CONCLUSION Selection criteria for magnetic resonance imaging referral are important in reducing waiting times for scans, patient anxiety and conserving trust resources.
前庭神经鞘瘤的磁共振成像:转诊的成本效益方案。
目的:前庭神经鞘瘤是桥小脑角最常见的肿瘤,快速自旋回波t2加权磁共振成像是诊断该肿瘤最敏感的方法。本研究评估了应用磁共振成像方案前后不必要的磁共振成像转诊的财务和时间成本。方法采用全审计周期进行评价。2012年1月的第一个周期是回顾性的,并根据标准指南评估了当前磁共振成像转诊选择标准的财务影响。2014年1月的第二个周期是议定书实施后的预期周期。结果第一周期和第二周期分别有46例和112例患者进行了磁共振成像。在磁共振成像的转诊中,分别有65%和81%的转诊在第一和第二周期中是合适的。相对危险度从0.5降低到0.2。核磁共振成像扫描的等待时间缩短了。结论磁共振影像学转诊的选择标准对减少候诊时间、减少患者焦虑、节约信任资源具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书