Sexual analysis in turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) neurocranium using geometric morphometric methods

Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.3906/vet-1910-92
Ozan Gündemir, Ermiş Özkan, M. O. Dayan, Sedat Aydoğdu
{"title":"Sexual analysis in turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) neurocranium using geometric morphometric methods","authors":"Ozan Gündemir, Ermiş Özkan, M. O. Dayan, Sedat Aydoğdu","doi":"10.3906/vet-1910-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to obtain morphometric data by applying geometric analysis to the neurocranium of the turkey and to statistically reveal the differences between males and females using these data. In the present study, 14 7 males, 7 females turkey skulls were used. The neurocrania of the samples were photographed and put into an electronic environment to be marked. Neurocrania were examined from 4 different regions caudal, ventral, dorsal, and lateral . Compared to PC1 obtained in dorsal sampling, the difference between points 9 and 10 and 3 to 2 was significantly higher in males. Caudal examination showed that male samples were wider laterally. In ventral measurements, it was seen that points 3 and 7 in the male were more anterior and point 1 was more posterior. The lateral area was seen to be higher in females and longer in the anterior-posterior direction in males. The greatest statistical difference was seen in landmark 4 middle point of foramen magnum's dorsal margin , obtained as a result of caudal geometric analysis P < 0.001 . The conditions of the points determined in this study in comparison with each other were determined in the coordinate system, and the differences were revealed. Geometric analysis was done in 4 different views, and statistical values were determined for sex differences in the landmarks used.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1910-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The aim of this study was to obtain morphometric data by applying geometric analysis to the neurocranium of the turkey and to statistically reveal the differences between males and females using these data. In the present study, 14 7 males, 7 females turkey skulls were used. The neurocrania of the samples were photographed and put into an electronic environment to be marked. Neurocrania were examined from 4 different regions caudal, ventral, dorsal, and lateral . Compared to PC1 obtained in dorsal sampling, the difference between points 9 and 10 and 3 to 2 was significantly higher in males. Caudal examination showed that male samples were wider laterally. In ventral measurements, it was seen that points 3 and 7 in the male were more anterior and point 1 was more posterior. The lateral area was seen to be higher in females and longer in the anterior-posterior direction in males. The greatest statistical difference was seen in landmark 4 middle point of foramen magnum's dorsal margin , obtained as a result of caudal geometric analysis P < 0.001 . The conditions of the points determined in this study in comparison with each other were determined in the coordinate system, and the differences were revealed. Geometric analysis was done in 4 different views, and statistical values were determined for sex differences in the landmarks used.
分享
查看原文
用几何形态计量学方法分析火鸡(Meleagris gallopavo)神经头盖骨的性别
本研究的目的是通过对火鸡的神经头盖骨进行几何分析来获得形态计量学数据,并利用这些数据统计揭示雄性和雌性之间的差异。本研究使用了14只公火鸡和7只母火鸡的颅骨。将样本的神经颅骨拍照并放入电子环境中进行标记。神经颅骨从尾部、腹侧、背侧和外侧4个不同区域进行检查。与背侧取样获得的PC1相比,第9点和第10点以及第3点和第2点之间的差异在男性中明显更大。尾端检查显示雄性样本横向较宽。在腹侧测量中,可以看到男性的第3点和第7点更靠前,第1点更靠后。女性的外侧区域较高,男性的前后方向较长。统计学差异最大的是枕骨大孔背缘标志4中点,经尾侧几何分析P < 0.001。在坐标系中确定了本研究中确定的点的条件进行相互比较,并揭示了差异。在4种不同的视图中进行几何分析,并确定所使用地标的性别差异的统计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信