Immunization Status Against Hepatitis B Among Iranian Junior Medical, Nursing, and Obstetrics Students With Different Vaccination Patterns

A. Allami, Navid Mohammadi, A. Najar
{"title":"Immunization Status Against Hepatitis B Among Iranian Junior Medical, Nursing, and Obstetrics Students With Different Vaccination Patterns","authors":"A. Allami, Navid Mohammadi, A. Najar","doi":"10.17795/BHS-27156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Since the protection time by hepatitis B (HB) vaccination is unclear, the strategy of immunization of junior students who previously received hepatitis vaccine is controversial. \nObjectives: This study aimed to determine the status of immunity to hepatitis B in junior medical, nursing and obstetrics students with different hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination patterns. \nPatients and Methods: In an analytical cross-sectional study, 255 junior medical sciences students were tested for quantitative antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). The proportion of protective immunity was compared in different vaccination patterns. \nResults: Vaccination coverage rates were 74.1%. About half the participants didn’t show serological evidence of protective immunity; 68.9% had their last shot more than 10 years ago and 30.4% had a vaccination history of five years or less (P < 0.001). Geometric mean level of anti-HBs titer among students, who had received a primary series vaccine at birth, was significantly lower than students who had started vaccination at an older age (P < 0.001). Also, analysis of variance for geometric mean of anti-HBs titer showed significant differences between groups based on injection time from the last shot (P < 0.001) (post hoc comparisons resulted in a P value of < 0.001 for birth versus < 5 year group, and P < 0.001 for the 5 to 10 year group). The lowest rate of non-protective level belonged to participants with complete three doses and a booster additional shot (27.1%). The final model for independent predictors of anti-HBs positive status was made by a binary logistic regression analysis. The model included presence of a booster dose, injection time from last shot, and discipline of study. \nConclusions: This study shows lower anti-HBs among students who were vaccinated at infancy compared to those vaccinated at older childhood or adolescence. Also, subsequent measurement of anti-HBs level at the time of entrance to university is recommended for all previously immunized students. \nKeywords: Hepatitis B; Vaccination; Medical Student; Antibody; Protective Immunity","PeriodicalId":8849,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/BHS-27156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Since the protection time by hepatitis B (HB) vaccination is unclear, the strategy of immunization of junior students who previously received hepatitis vaccine is controversial. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the status of immunity to hepatitis B in junior medical, nursing and obstetrics students with different hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination patterns. Patients and Methods: In an analytical cross-sectional study, 255 junior medical sciences students were tested for quantitative antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). The proportion of protective immunity was compared in different vaccination patterns. Results: Vaccination coverage rates were 74.1%. About half the participants didn’t show serological evidence of protective immunity; 68.9% had their last shot more than 10 years ago and 30.4% had a vaccination history of five years or less (P < 0.001). Geometric mean level of anti-HBs titer among students, who had received a primary series vaccine at birth, was significantly lower than students who had started vaccination at an older age (P < 0.001). Also, analysis of variance for geometric mean of anti-HBs titer showed significant differences between groups based on injection time from the last shot (P < 0.001) (post hoc comparisons resulted in a P value of < 0.001 for birth versus < 5 year group, and P < 0.001 for the 5 to 10 year group). The lowest rate of non-protective level belonged to participants with complete three doses and a booster additional shot (27.1%). The final model for independent predictors of anti-HBs positive status was made by a binary logistic regression analysis. The model included presence of a booster dose, injection time from last shot, and discipline of study. Conclusions: This study shows lower anti-HBs among students who were vaccinated at infancy compared to those vaccinated at older childhood or adolescence. Also, subsequent measurement of anti-HBs level at the time of entrance to university is recommended for all previously immunized students. Keywords: Hepatitis B; Vaccination; Medical Student; Antibody; Protective Immunity
不同接种方式的伊朗初级医学、护理和产科学生的乙型肝炎免疫状况
背景:由于乙肝疫苗接种的保护时间不明确,对曾接种过乙肝疫苗的初中生的免疫策略存在争议。目的:本研究旨在了解不同乙肝病毒(HBV)疫苗接种方式的初级医学、护理和产科学生对乙型肝炎的免疫状况。患者和方法:在一项分析性横断面研究中,对255名医学专业大三学生进行了乙型肝炎表面抗原(anti-HBs)的定量抗体检测。比较了不同疫苗接种方式的保护性免疫比例。结果:接种率为74.1%。大约一半的参与者没有显示出保护性免疫的血清学证据;68.9%的人最后一次疫苗接种时间在10年以上,30.4%的人疫苗接种史不超过5年(P < 0.001)。在出生时接种一次系列疫苗的学生中,抗hbs滴度的几何平均水平显著低于年龄较大的学生(P < 0.001)。此外,抗乙肝病毒滴度几何平均值的方差分析显示,根据注射时间从最后一次注射开始,两组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)(事后比较结果显示,出生组与5岁组的P值< 0.001,5至10岁组的P值< 0.001)。非保护水平率最低的是完成三次注射并再注射一次加强剂的参与者(27.1%)。通过二元logistic回归分析,建立了最终的抗- hbs阳性独立预测因子模型。该模型包括加强剂的存在,从最后一次注射开始的注射时间和研究学科。结论:这项研究表明,在婴儿期接种疫苗的学生的抗- hbs比在儿童期或青春期接种疫苗的学生低。此外,建议所有先前接种过疫苗的学生在进入大学时进行抗乙肝病毒水平的后续测量。关键词:乙型肝炎;疫苗接种;医科学生;抗体;保护性免疫
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信