Evaluation of monocyte counting with two automated instruments by the use of CD 14-specific immunomagnetic Dynabeads.

L. Theodorsen
{"title":"Evaluation of monocyte counting with two automated instruments by the use of CD 14-specific immunomagnetic Dynabeads.","authors":"L. Theodorsen","doi":"10.1111/J.1365-2257.1995.TB01241.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate determination of monocytes can be a problem with automated haematological analysers as well as with visual microscopy. We have compared monocyte counts from our two routine automated instruments, Technicon H*1 and Sysmex NE-1500. In the NE-1500 the monocyte counts appear to increase with increasing concentrations of neutrophils, compared with the H*1 results. The accuracy of the monocyte counts was assessed using Dynabeads M-450 CD14. These uniform magnetizable polystyrene beads coated with monoclonal antibody specific for CD14 membrane antigen isolated monocytes from the blood samples. The influence of this depletion on the monocyte counts and histograms from the two instruments and by visual microscopy were compared. On average 90% of the monocytes counted by visual microscopy were removed from six blood samples. In the same samples the beads removed an average of 75% of cells identified as monocytes by the H*1 but only 49% of those identified as monocytes by the NE-1500. These Dynabeads can be a useful tool in evaluating monocyte identification in different haematological situations and for manufacturers developing technology for automated leucocyte differential counting.","PeriodicalId":10285,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and laboratory haematology","volume":"332 1","pages":"225-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and laboratory haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2257.1995.TB01241.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Accurate determination of monocytes can be a problem with automated haematological analysers as well as with visual microscopy. We have compared monocyte counts from our two routine automated instruments, Technicon H*1 and Sysmex NE-1500. In the NE-1500 the monocyte counts appear to increase with increasing concentrations of neutrophils, compared with the H*1 results. The accuracy of the monocyte counts was assessed using Dynabeads M-450 CD14. These uniform magnetizable polystyrene beads coated with monoclonal antibody specific for CD14 membrane antigen isolated monocytes from the blood samples. The influence of this depletion on the monocyte counts and histograms from the two instruments and by visual microscopy were compared. On average 90% of the monocytes counted by visual microscopy were removed from six blood samples. In the same samples the beads removed an average of 75% of cells identified as monocytes by the H*1 but only 49% of those identified as monocytes by the NE-1500. These Dynabeads can be a useful tool in evaluating monocyte identification in different haematological situations and for manufacturers developing technology for automated leucocyte differential counting.
使用cd14特异性免疫磁头对两种自动仪器单核细胞计数的评价。
准确测定单核细胞可能是一个问题与自动血液学分析仪以及视觉显微镜。我们比较了我们的两个常规自动化仪器,Technicon H*1和Sysmex NE-1500的单核细胞计数。与H*1结果相比,NE-1500单核细胞计数随着中性粒细胞浓度的增加而增加。使用dynabead M-450 CD14评估单核细胞计数的准确性。这些涂有CD14膜抗原特异性单克隆抗体的均匀磁化聚苯乙烯珠从血液样本中分离出单核细胞。比较了这两种仪器和视觉显微镜对单核细胞计数和直方图的影响。平均90%的单核细胞通过视觉显微镜计数从6个血液样本中被去除。在相同的样品中,珠粒平均去除75%被H*1鉴定为单核细胞的细胞,但仅去除49%被NE-1500鉴定为单核细胞的细胞。这些dynabheads可以在不同血液学情况下评估单核细胞鉴定,并为制造商开发自动白细胞鉴别计数技术提供有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信