Russell’s Paradox: a historical study about the paradox in Frege’s theories

Aline Germano Fonseca Coury, Denise Silva Vilela
{"title":"Russell’s Paradox: a historical study about the paradox in Frege’s theories","authors":"Aline Germano Fonseca Coury, Denise Silva Vilela","doi":"10.47976/rbhm2018v18n351-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For over twenty years, Frege tried to find the foundations of arithmetic through logic, and by doing this, he attempted to establish the truth and certainty of the knowledge. However, when he believed his work wasdone, Bertrand Russell sent him a letter pointing out a paradox, known as Russell‟s paradox. It is often considered that Russell identified the paradox in Frege‟s theories. However, as shown in this paper, Russell, Frege and also George Cantor contributedsignificantly to the identification of the paradox. In 1902, Russell encouraged Frege to reconsider a portion of his work based in a paradox built from Cantor‟s theories. Previously, in 1885, Cantor had warned Frege about taking extensions of concepts in the construction of his system. With these considerations, Frege managed to identify the precise law and definitions that allowed the generation of the paradox in his system. The objective of this paper is to present a historical reconstruction of the paradox in Frege‟s publications and discuss it considering the correspondences exchanged between him and Russell. We shall take special attention to the role played by each of these mathematicians in the identification of the paradox and its developments. We also will show how Frege anticipated the solutions and new theories that would arise when dealing with logico-mathematical paradoxes, including but not limited to Russell‟s paradox.","PeriodicalId":34320,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Historia da Matematica","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Historia da Matematica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47976/rbhm2018v18n351-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For over twenty years, Frege tried to find the foundations of arithmetic through logic, and by doing this, he attempted to establish the truth and certainty of the knowledge. However, when he believed his work wasdone, Bertrand Russell sent him a letter pointing out a paradox, known as Russell‟s paradox. It is often considered that Russell identified the paradox in Frege‟s theories. However, as shown in this paper, Russell, Frege and also George Cantor contributedsignificantly to the identification of the paradox. In 1902, Russell encouraged Frege to reconsider a portion of his work based in a paradox built from Cantor‟s theories. Previously, in 1885, Cantor had warned Frege about taking extensions of concepts in the construction of his system. With these considerations, Frege managed to identify the precise law and definitions that allowed the generation of the paradox in his system. The objective of this paper is to present a historical reconstruction of the paradox in Frege‟s publications and discuss it considering the correspondences exchanged between him and Russell. We shall take special attention to the role played by each of these mathematicians in the identification of the paradox and its developments. We also will show how Frege anticipated the solutions and new theories that would arise when dealing with logico-mathematical paradoxes, including but not limited to Russell‟s paradox.
罗素悖论:弗雷格理论悖论的历史考察
在二十多年的时间里,弗雷格试图通过逻辑找到算术的基础,通过这样做,他试图建立知识的真实性和确定性。然而,当他相信他的工作已经完成时,伯特兰·罗素给他写了一封信,指出了一个悖论,即罗素悖论。人们常常认为罗素发现了弗雷格理论中的悖论。然而,正如本文所示,罗素、弗雷格和乔治·康托尔对悖论的识别做出了重大贡献。1902年,罗素鼓励弗雷格重新考虑他的一部分基于康托尔理论的悖论。早在1885年,康托尔就警告过弗雷格,不要在构建他的体系时使用概念的延伸。有了这些考虑,弗雷格设法确定了在他的体系中产生悖论的精确规律和定义。本文的目的是对弗雷格著作中的悖论进行历史重构,并结合他与罗素的书信往来进行讨论。我们将特别注意这些数学家在确定悖论及其发展过程中所起的作用。我们还将展示弗雷格是如何预测在处理逻辑数学悖论(包括但不限于罗素悖论)时出现的解决方案和新理论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信