Decolonial Struggles in Indigenous Language Education in Neoliberal Times: Identities, Ideologies, and Activism

IF 1.5 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
P. Phyak, Peter I. de Costa
{"title":"Decolonial Struggles in Indigenous Language Education in Neoliberal Times: Identities, Ideologies, and Activism","authors":"P. Phyak, Peter I. de Costa","doi":"10.1080/15348458.2021.1957683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of Indigenous languages and epistemologies for sustainable development, equitable society, and a green environment is acknowledged by a significant body of literature (e.g., Green et al., 2010; Harmsworth, 2002; Magni, 2017). Green et al. (2010), for example, argue that “Indigenous knowledge may well be one of the keys in understanding how best to engage in culturally appropriate climate change adaptation strategies for these [Indigenous] communities” (p. 351). Indigenous languages thus provide a critical and sustainable foundation for protecting ecological knowledge and helping communities to adapt with and to climate change (Nakashima & Krupnik, 2018). Studies have shown that Indigenous peoples’ knowledge about the environment, agriculture, food, language, place and time offer transformative and equitable agency to support their communities, help safeguard the degrading climate, as well as build liveable and equitable communities (Mafongoya & Ajayi, 2017; Nyong et al., 2007). In education, such knowledge plays an equally important role in creating and ensuring an equitable, accessible, and quality learning environment for all children. For Owuor (2007), Indigenous bodies of knowledge play a critical role “in directing the goals of education for sustainable development [. . .] and in addressing local problems affecting societies, especially the devastating effects of HIV/AIDS pandemic [in Africa]” (p. 27). Consequently, researchers from across the globe have consistently argued that the implementation of Indigenous language policies in education systems contributes to building strong literacy and developing the cognitive, ecological, and cultural knowledge of learners (Hornberger, 2006; Romero-Little, 2006). More importantly, Indigenous language education is necessary to sustain Indigenous peoples’ right to speak and promote their cultural and linguistic practices (May, 2013). Acknowledging the multidimensional value of Indigenous languages, the United Nations launched the International Decade of Indigenous Languages (2022–2032) to empower users of Indigenous languages around the world. With its slogan “nothing for us without us,” the U.N. declaration acknowledges the value of Indigenous languages for building inclusive communities. This declaration also helps guarantee that the cultural and linguistic rights of Indigenous people are upheld and that they are treated in a socially just way. In addition, the declaration recognizes the significance of Indigenous languages to sustainable development and the protection of biodiversity. While such global efforts play critical roles in creating space for Indigenous languages in the public sphere, Indigenous communities and language users continue to face linguistic, cultural, and epistemic discrimination (Rousseau & Dargent, 2019), however. Such forms of discrimination largely stem from state policies that embrace colonial, nationalist, and neoliberal ideologies in education. Although these ideologies have different names, all of them carry the ideology of linguistic homogeneity and are characterized by social inequalities that Western-European regimes have historically created and promoted. Put differently, in many post-colonial regimes, states often continue to reproduce linguistic homogeneity and hierarchies of language that misrecognize the importance of Indigenous languages.","PeriodicalId":46978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Identity and Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"291 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Identity and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2021.1957683","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The importance of Indigenous languages and epistemologies for sustainable development, equitable society, and a green environment is acknowledged by a significant body of literature (e.g., Green et al., 2010; Harmsworth, 2002; Magni, 2017). Green et al. (2010), for example, argue that “Indigenous knowledge may well be one of the keys in understanding how best to engage in culturally appropriate climate change adaptation strategies for these [Indigenous] communities” (p. 351). Indigenous languages thus provide a critical and sustainable foundation for protecting ecological knowledge and helping communities to adapt with and to climate change (Nakashima & Krupnik, 2018). Studies have shown that Indigenous peoples’ knowledge about the environment, agriculture, food, language, place and time offer transformative and equitable agency to support their communities, help safeguard the degrading climate, as well as build liveable and equitable communities (Mafongoya & Ajayi, 2017; Nyong et al., 2007). In education, such knowledge plays an equally important role in creating and ensuring an equitable, accessible, and quality learning environment for all children. For Owuor (2007), Indigenous bodies of knowledge play a critical role “in directing the goals of education for sustainable development [. . .] and in addressing local problems affecting societies, especially the devastating effects of HIV/AIDS pandemic [in Africa]” (p. 27). Consequently, researchers from across the globe have consistently argued that the implementation of Indigenous language policies in education systems contributes to building strong literacy and developing the cognitive, ecological, and cultural knowledge of learners (Hornberger, 2006; Romero-Little, 2006). More importantly, Indigenous language education is necessary to sustain Indigenous peoples’ right to speak and promote their cultural and linguistic practices (May, 2013). Acknowledging the multidimensional value of Indigenous languages, the United Nations launched the International Decade of Indigenous Languages (2022–2032) to empower users of Indigenous languages around the world. With its slogan “nothing for us without us,” the U.N. declaration acknowledges the value of Indigenous languages for building inclusive communities. This declaration also helps guarantee that the cultural and linguistic rights of Indigenous people are upheld and that they are treated in a socially just way. In addition, the declaration recognizes the significance of Indigenous languages to sustainable development and the protection of biodiversity. While such global efforts play critical roles in creating space for Indigenous languages in the public sphere, Indigenous communities and language users continue to face linguistic, cultural, and epistemic discrimination (Rousseau & Dargent, 2019), however. Such forms of discrimination largely stem from state policies that embrace colonial, nationalist, and neoliberal ideologies in education. Although these ideologies have different names, all of them carry the ideology of linguistic homogeneity and are characterized by social inequalities that Western-European regimes have historically created and promoted. Put differently, in many post-colonial regimes, states often continue to reproduce linguistic homogeneity and hierarchies of language that misrecognize the importance of Indigenous languages.
新自由主义时代土著语言教育中的去殖民化斗争:身份、意识形态和行动主义
土著语言和认识论对可持续发展、公平社会和绿色环境的重要性得到了大量文献的认可(例如,green等人,2010;哈姆斯沃斯认为2002;马尼,2017)。例如,Green等人(2010)认为,“土著知识很可能是理解如何最好地为这些[土著]社区参与文化上适当的气候变化适应战略的关键之一”(第351页)。因此,土著语言为保护生态知识和帮助社区适应和应对气候变化提供了关键和可持续的基础(Nakashima & Krupnik, 2018)。研究表明,土著人民关于环境、农业、粮食、语言、地点和时间的知识提供了变革性和公平的机构,以支持他们的社区,帮助保护退化的气候,并建立宜居和公平的社区(maongoya & Ajayi, 2017;Nyong et al., 2007)。在教育方面,这些知识在为所有儿童创造和确保公平、无障碍和高质量的学习环境方面发挥着同样重要的作用。在Owuor看来(2007年),土著知识机构“在指导促进可持续发展的教育目标[. .]和解决影响社会的地方问题,特别是[在非洲]艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行病的破坏性影响方面”发挥着关键作用(第27页)。因此,来自世界各地的研究人员一直认为,在教育系统中实施土著语言政策有助于建立强大的读写能力,并发展学习者的认知、生态和文化知识(Hornberger, 2006;Romero-Little, 2006)。更重要的是,土著语言教育对于维护土著人民的发言权和促进其文化和语言实践是必要的(2013年5月)。认识到土著语言的多重价值,联合国发起了土著语言国际十年(2022-2032),以增强世界各地土著语言用户的权能。联合国宣言的口号是“没有我们,我们一无所有”,承认土著语言对建立包容性社区的价值。《宣言》还有助于保障土著人民的文化和语言权利得到维护,并以社会公正的方式对待他们。此外,《宣言》承认土著语言对可持续发展和保护生物多样性的重要性。尽管这些全球努力在为土著语言在公共领域创造空间方面发挥了关键作用,但土著社区和语言使用者仍然面临语言、文化和认知上的歧视(Rousseau & Dargent, 2019)。这种形式的歧视在很大程度上源于国家在教育中奉行殖民主义、民族主义和新自由主义意识形态的政策。虽然这些意识形态有不同的名称,但它们都带有语言同质性的意识形态,并以西欧政权在历史上创造和推动的社会不平等为特征。换句话说,在许多后殖民政权中,国家经常继续复制语言的同质性和等级制度,错误地认识到土著语言的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信