Addressing the digital divide: who is being left behind in the evaluation of e-Health interventions to improve medication adherence?

João Gregório, T. Maricoto, Paulo A. S. Moreira, F. Roque, J. Correia-de-Sousa, M. T. Herdeiro, I. Almeida, Ioanna Tsiligi, T. Ágh, C. Jácome
{"title":"Addressing the digital divide: who is being left behind in the evaluation of e-Health interventions to improve medication adherence?","authors":"João Gregório, T. Maricoto, Paulo A. S. Moreira, F. Roque, J. Correia-de-Sousa, M. T. Herdeiro, I. Almeida, Ioanna Tsiligi, T. Ágh, C. Jácome","doi":"10.19277/bbr.20.1.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of e-Health initiatives aimed at improving medication adherence has shown limited success. This may be attributed to inadequate participant selection in evaluation studies. The objective of this evidence-based commentary is to examine the inclusion criteria of participants in e-Health interventions for medication adherence. In May 2021, we identified two systematic reviews, encompassing a total of 44 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating e-Health interventions for medication adherence. These interventions were aimed to diabetes (n=10), immunosuppressive therapy (n=6), and cardiovascular diseases (n=29). Participants in interventions utilizing digital apps had a lower mean age compared to those using telephones (53.9 ± 7.5 years vs. 63.4 ± 6.3 years). Most papers (91.0%) did not report participants' level of digital literacy, and educational background was only mentioned in 57.8% of the studies. Exclusion criteria associated with age, education, health conditions, were identified in the assessment of e-Health interventions, while digital literacy was seldom assessed. It is recommended incorporating the assessment and reporting of digital literacy into participant selection procedures in RCTs to address the digital divide and obtain more accurate information regarding the efficacy of e-Health interventions. Keywords: Medication adherence, e-Health evaluation, digital divide, health inequities, digital health","PeriodicalId":36701,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biopharmaceutical Research","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biopharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19277/bbr.20.1.315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of e-Health initiatives aimed at improving medication adherence has shown limited success. This may be attributed to inadequate participant selection in evaluation studies. The objective of this evidence-based commentary is to examine the inclusion criteria of participants in e-Health interventions for medication adherence. In May 2021, we identified two systematic reviews, encompassing a total of 44 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating e-Health interventions for medication adherence. These interventions were aimed to diabetes (n=10), immunosuppressive therapy (n=6), and cardiovascular diseases (n=29). Participants in interventions utilizing digital apps had a lower mean age compared to those using telephones (53.9 ± 7.5 years vs. 63.4 ± 6.3 years). Most papers (91.0%) did not report participants' level of digital literacy, and educational background was only mentioned in 57.8% of the studies. Exclusion criteria associated with age, education, health conditions, were identified in the assessment of e-Health interventions, while digital literacy was seldom assessed. It is recommended incorporating the assessment and reporting of digital literacy into participant selection procedures in RCTs to address the digital divide and obtain more accurate information regarding the efficacy of e-Health interventions. Keywords: Medication adherence, e-Health evaluation, digital divide, health inequities, digital health
解决数字鸿沟:在评估电子卫生干预措施以改善服药依从性方面,谁被落在了后面?
旨在改善服药依从性的电子保健举措的实施取得了有限的成功。这可能是由于评价研究中参与者选择不足造成的。这篇基于证据的评论的目的是检查电子卫生干预措施中药物依从性参与者的纳入标准。在2021年5月,我们确定了两项系统综述,共包括44项随机对照试验(rct),评估电子健康干预措施对药物依从性的影响。这些干预措施针对糖尿病(n=10)、免疫抑制治疗(n=6)和心血管疾病(n=29)。与使用电话的参与者相比,使用数字应用程序的干预参与者的平均年龄更低(53.9±7.5岁对63.4±6.3岁)。大多数论文(91.0%)没有报告参与者的数字素养水平,只有57.8%的研究提到了教育背景。在评估电子保健干预措施时,确定了与年龄、教育、健康状况相关的排除标准,而很少评估数字扫盲。建议将数字素养的评估和报告纳入随机对照试验的参与者选择程序,以解决数字鸿沟问题,并获得有关电子卫生干预措施有效性的更准确信息。关键词:服药依从性,电子健康评估,数字鸿沟,健康不公平,数字健康
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical and Biopharmaceutical Research
Biomedical and Biopharmaceutical Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信