Does this Explanation Help? Designing Local Model-agnostic Explanation Representations and an Experimental Evaluation using Eye-tracking Technology

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Miguel Angel Meza Martínez, Mario Nadj, Moritz Langner, Peyman Toreini, A. Maedche
{"title":"Does this Explanation Help? Designing Local Model-agnostic Explanation Representations and an Experimental Evaluation using Eye-tracking Technology","authors":"Miguel Angel Meza Martínez, Mario Nadj, Moritz Langner, Peyman Toreini, A. Maedche","doi":"10.1145/3607145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research, various local model-agnostic methods have been proposed to explain individual predictions to users in order to increase the transparency of the underlying Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. However, the user perspective has received less attention in XAI research, leading to a (1) lack of involvement of users in the design process of local model-agnostic explanations representations and (2) a limited understanding of how users visually attend them. Against this backdrop, we refined representations of local explanations from four well-established model-agnostic XAI methods in an iterative design process with users. Moreover, we evaluated the refined explanation representations in a laboratory experiment using eye-tracking technology as well as self-reports and interviews. Our results show that users do not necessarily prefer simple explanations and that their individual characteristics, such as gender and previous experience with AI systems, strongly influence their preferences. In addition, users find that some explanations are only useful in certain scenarios making the selection of an appropriate explanation highly dependent on context. With our work, we contribute to ongoing research to improve transparency in AI.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3607145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research, various local model-agnostic methods have been proposed to explain individual predictions to users in order to increase the transparency of the underlying Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. However, the user perspective has received less attention in XAI research, leading to a (1) lack of involvement of users in the design process of local model-agnostic explanations representations and (2) a limited understanding of how users visually attend them. Against this backdrop, we refined representations of local explanations from four well-established model-agnostic XAI methods in an iterative design process with users. Moreover, we evaluated the refined explanation representations in a laboratory experiment using eye-tracking technology as well as self-reports and interviews. Our results show that users do not necessarily prefer simple explanations and that their individual characteristics, such as gender and previous experience with AI systems, strongly influence their preferences. In addition, users find that some explanations are only useful in certain scenarios making the selection of an appropriate explanation highly dependent on context. With our work, we contribute to ongoing research to improve transparency in AI.
这个解释有帮助吗?基于眼动追踪技术的局部模型不可知解释表征设计与实验评价
在可解释人工智能(XAI)研究中,已经提出了各种局部模型不可知论方法来向用户解释个人预测,以增加底层人工智能(AI)系统的透明度。然而,用户视角在XAI研究中受到的关注较少,导致(1)用户在局部模型不可知的解释表示的设计过程中缺乏参与;(2)对用户如何在视觉上参与它们的理解有限。在此背景下,我们在与用户的迭代设计过程中,从四种已建立的与模型无关的XAI方法中改进了局部解释的表示。此外,我们在实验室实验中使用眼动追踪技术、自我报告和访谈来评估精炼的解释表征。我们的研究结果表明,用户不一定喜欢简单的解释,他们的个人特征,如性别和以前使用人工智能系统的经验,强烈地影响了他们的偏好。此外,用户发现一些解释只在某些情况下有用,这使得选择适当的解释高度依赖于上下文。通过我们的工作,我们为正在进行的提高人工智能透明度的研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信