The Ring Never Relieves – Response rules for metro circle lines

IF 2.6 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Christian Liebchen , Steffen Dutsch , Shiguang Jin , Norio Tomii , Yihui Wang
{"title":"The Ring Never Relieves – Response rules for metro circle lines","authors":"Christian Liebchen ,&nbsp;Steffen Dutsch ,&nbsp;Shiguang Jin ,&nbsp;Norio Tomii ,&nbsp;Yihui Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Regarding the disposition of metro lines in order to recover from delays, in the literature there can be found two branches of contributions: descriptions of response rules such as expressing (aka skip stop), holding and short-turning together with case studies of their application. And there are fully-automated optimization models that optimize some specified objective function, e.g. minimizing the total train delays.</p><p>We are not aware of any study that puts its focus specifically on ring lines (aka circle or loop lines). In the absence in particular of essentially immediate time buffers in turnaround activities in the endpoints, the operation of a circle line is particularly challenging, when comparing it with the common bi-directional lines.</p><p>In this spirit, we are collecting response rules that are applicable especially for circle lines. We sketch their impacts on the passengers’ travel experience and on the resource schedules for the rolling stock and staff, and we provide illustrative drawings.</p><p>Moreover, we conducted interviews with experts of eleven metro networks that are operating circle lines. We report their answers, which response rules are applied most often. Despite the limited possibilities along circle lines there is a broad repertoire of response action that is taken regularly – somehow surprisingly, one standard general response rule that is often discussed in the literature and in principle applicable to circle lines, too (expressing), is almost never applied in practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970622000324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Regarding the disposition of metro lines in order to recover from delays, in the literature there can be found two branches of contributions: descriptions of response rules such as expressing (aka skip stop), holding and short-turning together with case studies of their application. And there are fully-automated optimization models that optimize some specified objective function, e.g. minimizing the total train delays.

We are not aware of any study that puts its focus specifically on ring lines (aka circle or loop lines). In the absence in particular of essentially immediate time buffers in turnaround activities in the endpoints, the operation of a circle line is particularly challenging, when comparing it with the common bi-directional lines.

In this spirit, we are collecting response rules that are applicable especially for circle lines. We sketch their impacts on the passengers’ travel experience and on the resource schedules for the rolling stock and staff, and we provide illustrative drawings.

Moreover, we conducted interviews with experts of eleven metro networks that are operating circle lines. We report their answers, which response rules are applied most often. Despite the limited possibilities along circle lines there is a broad repertoire of response action that is taken regularly – somehow surprisingly, one standard general response rule that is often discussed in the literature and in principle applicable to circle lines, too (expressing), is almost never applied in practice.

环线永不放松——地铁环线的响应规则
关于地铁线路的配置,以便从延误中恢复,在文献中可以找到两个分支的贡献:对响应规则的描述,如表达(又名跳停),保持和短转弯以及它们的应用案例研究。还有一些全自动优化模型,可以优化某些特定的目标函数,例如最小化列车总延误。我们不知道有任何研究将其重点放在环线(又名圆圈或环路)上。特别是在端点的周转活动中缺乏基本的即时时间缓冲时,当将其与普通双向线进行比较时,环线的操作尤其具有挑战性。本着这种精神,我们正在收集特别适用于环形线路的响应规则。我们概述了它们对乘客旅行体验的影响,以及对铁路车辆和员工资源调度的影响,并提供了说明性的图纸。此外,我们还采访了11个运营环线的地铁网络的专家。我们报告他们的答案,哪些响应规则最常被应用。尽管沿着环形线的可能性有限,但有一个广泛的定期采取的反应行动的曲目-不知怎的,令人惊讶的是,在文献中经常讨论的一个标准的一般反应规则,原则上也适用于环形线(表达),几乎从未在实践中应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信