HEALTH EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOR INCARCERATED WOMEN IN THE LIGHT OF HEALTH LITERACY

Q2 Nursing

Texto Contexto Enfermagem Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2022-0260en

Dayze Djanira Furtado de Galiza, Lisidna Almeida Cabral, Ana Larissa Gomes Machado, T. Moreira, H. A. D. C. Sampaio

{"title":"HEALTH EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOR INCARCERATED WOMEN IN THE LIGHT OF HEALTH LITERACY","authors":"Dayze Djanira Furtado de Galiza, Lisidna Almeida Cabral, Ana Larissa Gomes Machado, T. Moreira, H. A. D. C. Sampaio","doi":"10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2022-0260en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: to validate the content of educational videos for incarcerated women, in the light of health literacy. Method: methodological study with development of three videos for incarcerated women with themes chosen by them (Menstrual Cycle, Arterial Hypertension and Epilepsy), developed in four stages: construction of storyboards, validation by expert judges, construction of videos and validation by the public. The validation process was performed by seven judges with the Health Educational Content Validation Instrument, the Suitability Assessment of Materials and readability analysis. For approval, it was established that the agreement between judges should be higher than 80%, and the adequacy, according to the SAM, should be 40-100%. The incarcerated women evaluated the videos in August 2022, in a women's public prison in Ceará, using the Assistive Technology Assessment Instrument, considering the level of agreement of the positive responses above 70%. Results: the validation instrument result of the storyboards ranged from 0.92 to 1.0. In the Suitability Assessment, a percentage of 85.2% to 88.8% was reached, categorizing the materials as superior. As for readability, the values obtained (70.9 to 78.1) place the texts as easy or very easy to read. The evaluation by the target audience showed that the videos were adequate (97.8-100%). Conclusion: the three videos constructed were suitable for incarcerated women, with evidence of content validity and may be used in health education actions for this public.","PeriodicalId":51188,"journal":{"name":"Texto Contexto Enfermagem","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texto Contexto Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2022-0260en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: to validate the content of educational videos for incarcerated women, in the light of health literacy. Method: methodological study with development of three videos for incarcerated women with themes chosen by them (Menstrual Cycle, Arterial Hypertension and Epilepsy), developed in four stages: construction of storyboards, validation by expert judges, construction of videos and validation by the public. The validation process was performed by seven judges with the Health Educational Content Validation Instrument, the Suitability Assessment of Materials and readability analysis. For approval, it was established that the agreement between judges should be higher than 80%, and the adequacy, according to the SAM, should be 40-100%. The incarcerated women evaluated the videos in August 2022, in a women's public prison in Ceará, using the Assistive Technology Assessment Instrument, considering the level of agreement of the positive responses above 70%. Results: the validation instrument result of the storyboards ranged from 0.92 to 1.0. In the Suitability Assessment, a percentage of 85.2% to 88.8% was reached, categorizing the materials as superior. As for readability, the values obtained (70.9 to 78.1) place the texts as easy or very easy to read. The evaluation by the target audience showed that the videos were adequate (97.8-100%). Conclusion: the three videos constructed were suitable for incarcerated women, with evidence of content validity and may be used in health education actions for this public.

查看原文本刊更多论文

根据卫生知识普及，为被监禁妇女提供卫生教育技术

【摘要】目的:从健康素养的角度验证监禁女性教育视频的内容。方法:方法学研究，为被监禁妇女制作三个视频，主题由她们选择(月经周期、动脉高血压和癫痫)，分为四个阶段:构建故事板、专家评委验证、构建视频和公众验证。验证过程由7名评审通过健康教育内容验证工具、材料适用性评估和可读性分析进行。为了获得批准，确定法官之间的一致性应高于80%，根据SAM，充分性应在40-100%之间。2022年8月，在加利福尼亚的一所女子公立监狱，被监禁的女性使用辅助技术评估工具评估了这些视频，考虑到70%以上的积极回应的同意程度。结果:故事板的验证工具结果在0.92到1.0之间。在适宜性评价中，达到85.2% ~ 88.8%，材料为优。在可读性方面，所获得的数值(70.9到78.1)将文本置于容易阅读或非常容易阅读的位置。目标受众的评价表明，视频是足够的(97.8-100%)。结论:所构建的三段视频适合于服刑妇女，内容效度高，可用于服刑妇女的健康教育活动。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Texto Contexto Enfermagem Nursing-General Nursing

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Texto & Contexto Enfermagem provides space for reflection and deepening of knowledge about issues of practice, teaching and research in health and nursing, at national and international levels. The journal is published quarterly in the rolling pass or Continuous flow mode, accepting manuscripts in Portuguese, English or Spanish, in the categories original article, reflection, experience report and review. Contributions designated to the dissemination of unpublished original research results are prioritized for publication. Special issues are published at the discretion of the Board of Directors and Associate Editors. All manuscripts are published in two versions, one of which is English, aiming to cover the largest number of readers worldwide. The editorial policy of Texto & Contexto Enfermagem is based on rigorous quality criteria for indexing and publishing (including technical and normative aspects, graphic and textual quality and excellence in scientific content); on responsibility for shared management between the Board of Directors, Editorial Board and Internal and External Editors Associates; and on the rigorous and constructive peer review, preserving the anonymity of authors and reviewers (double blinded).