Sociology and susan sontag: Re-shaping the discipline

Joanne L. Finkelstein
{"title":"Sociology and susan sontag: Re-shaping the discipline","authors":"Joanne L. Finkelstein","doi":"10.1016/S0148-0685(81)93134-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sociology's origins lie in moral idealism, in a concern to end human misery and, instead, create a humanistic society. It has betrayed these origins through an overconcern with its stature as a science. The desire for academic respectability has limited sociology to conventional methodological practices, whereas, to fulfil its original ambitions it needs a broader vision and wider data base than is conventionally permitted. Indeed, those works outside the academic framework, from the avant-garde to Feminist scholarship, come closer to explaining modernity than does the discipline commissioned to do so. The continuity between all acts of intellectuality and conceptuality is based upon the human experience. The emergence of interpretative frameworks and metalanguages limits understanding: there is a need for broader research questions and perspectives. Feminist scholarship offers that vision and the works of Susan Sontag, her concern with art, photography, language and modernity, illustrate the principles of this alternative scholarship. With sociology reshaped through a new perspective, its research questions would focus on the authoritarianism of knowledge systems; the hierarchical arrangement of ideas; the infantilism of individuals through certain linguistic practices; and the need to construct knowledge which is emancipatory. The arts, the avant-garde, marginal voices and alternative knowledge systems should, thus, become beacons for sociology in its desire to understand the modern, social experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":85875,"journal":{"name":"Women's studies international quarterly","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 179-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0148-0685(81)93134-1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's studies international quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148068581931341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sociology's origins lie in moral idealism, in a concern to end human misery and, instead, create a humanistic society. It has betrayed these origins through an overconcern with its stature as a science. The desire for academic respectability has limited sociology to conventional methodological practices, whereas, to fulfil its original ambitions it needs a broader vision and wider data base than is conventionally permitted. Indeed, those works outside the academic framework, from the avant-garde to Feminist scholarship, come closer to explaining modernity than does the discipline commissioned to do so. The continuity between all acts of intellectuality and conceptuality is based upon the human experience. The emergence of interpretative frameworks and metalanguages limits understanding: there is a need for broader research questions and perspectives. Feminist scholarship offers that vision and the works of Susan Sontag, her concern with art, photography, language and modernity, illustrate the principles of this alternative scholarship. With sociology reshaped through a new perspective, its research questions would focus on the authoritarianism of knowledge systems; the hierarchical arrangement of ideas; the infantilism of individuals through certain linguistic practices; and the need to construct knowledge which is emancipatory. The arts, the avant-garde, marginal voices and alternative knowledge systems should, thus, become beacons for sociology in its desire to understand the modern, social experience.

社会学与苏珊·桑塔格:重塑这门学科
社会学的起源在于道德理想主义,在于结束人类的苦难,而不是创造一个人文社会。由于过分关注其作为一门科学的地位,它已经背叛了这些起源。对学术声望的渴望将社会学限制在传统的方法论实践中,然而,为了实现其最初的抱负,它需要比传统允许的更广阔的视野和更广泛的数据库。事实上,那些在学术框架之外的作品,从先锋派到女权主义学术,比学科委托做的更接近于解释现代性。知性和概念性的所有行为之间的连续性是以人类经验为基础的。解释性框架和元语言的出现限制了理解:需要更广泛的研究问题和视角。女权主义学术提供了这种视野,苏珊·桑塔格的作品,她对艺术、摄影、语言和现代性的关注,说明了这种另类学术的原则。以新的视角重塑社会学,其研究问题将聚焦于知识系统的威权主义;思想的层次结构;通过特定的语言实践个体的幼稚性;以及建构解放性知识的需要。因此,艺术、前卫、边缘声音和另类知识体系应该成为社会学理解现代社会经验的灯塔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信