Marie Trijau, Benoit Goussen, André Gergs, S. Charles
{"title":"rDEBtktd, an R-package for analysis and forward-prediction of sublethal effects","authors":"Marie Trijau, Benoit Goussen, André Gergs, S. Charles","doi":"10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPJ7LB5.V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) of chemicals is based on standard laboratory toxicity\n tests with living organisms which ensure controlled experimental conditions and reproducibility.\n These toxicity tests are usually carried out under constant exposure concentrations,\n which can be far from reality of environmental exposure regimes as foreseen by the\n practical use of chemicals. In that respect mechanistic effect modelling, such as\n Toxicokinectic – Toxicodynamic (TKTD) modelling, has recently been playing an increasing\n role in the extrapolation of effects from constant controlled exposure conditions\n to time-variable exposure, closer to real environmental conditions. Among TKTD models,\n models based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory adapted for ecotoxicology (DEB-TKTD\n models) offer a comprehensive framework to analyse and extrapolate sublethal effects\n (growth and reproduction) of chemicals on individual organisms across their whole\n life cycle. While the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of TKTD effect\n models (EFSA PPR, 2018. EFSA Journal;16(8):5377) considers DEB-TKTD models as valuable\n tools for ERA, their full acceptance by stake-holders still requires the development\n of standardized and user-friendly tools. To bridge this gap, we developed ready-to-use\n functions within a new R package “rDEBtktd”. This package takes advantage of the general\n Bayesian framework thus enabling the estimation of probability distributions for physiological\n DEB parameters and TKTD parameters, from which uncertainties can be easily quantified\n to be then propagated to forward-predictions for untested time-variable exposure scenarios.\n The physiological part of the DEB-TKTD model we implemented follows the original definition\n of the DEB model, which allows using the parameter values available for more than\n 1000 species in the Add-my-Pet database as prior information for the Bayesian inference\n process. This poster illustrates: (1) how to simply simultaneously estimate all the\n parameters of the DEB-TKTD model from one or several growth and reproduction datasets,\n (2) how to produce informative summaries to assess the results of the Bayesian inference\n and check all goodness-of-fit criteria, (3) how to make growth and reproduction predictions\n for untested time-variable exposure scenarios, (4) and finally the influence of both\n data quantity and design on the precision of parameter estimates. Environmental Risk\n Assessment (ERA) of chemicals is based on standard laboratory toxicity tests with\n living organisms which ensure controlled experimental conditions and reproducibility.\n These toxicity tests are usually carried out under constant exposure concentrations,\n which can be far from reality of environmental exposure regimes as foreseen by the\n practical use of chemicals. In that respect mechanistic effect modelling, such as\n Toxicokinectic – Toxicodynamic (TKTD) modelling, has recently been playing an increasing\n role in the extrapolation of effects from constant controlled exposure conditions\n to time-variable exposure, closer to real environmental conditions. Among TKTD models,\n models based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory adapted for ecotoxicology (DEB-TKTD\n models) offer a comprehensive framework to analyse and extrapolate sublethal effects\n (growth and reproduction) of chemicals on individual organisms across their whole\n life cycle. While the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of TKTD effect\n models (EFSA PPR, 2018. EFSA Journal;16(8):5377) considers DEB-TKTD models as valuable\n tools for ERA, their full acceptance by stake-holders still requires the development\n of standardized and user-friendly tools. To bridge this gap, we developed ready-to-use\n functions within a new R package “rDEBtktd”. This package takes advantage of the general\n Bayesian framework thus enabling the estimation of probability distributions for physiological\n DEB parameters and TKTD parameters, from which uncertainties can be easily quantified\n to be then propagated to forward-predictions for untested time-variable exposure scenarios.\n The physiological part of the DEB-TKTD model we implemented follows the original definition\n of the DEB model, which allows using the parameter values available for more than\n 1000 species in the Add-my-Pet database as prior information for the Bayesian inference\n process. This poster illustrates: (1) how to simply simultaneously estimate all the\n parameters of the DEB-TKTD model from one or several growth and reproduction datasets,\n (2) how to produce informative summaries to assess the results of the Bayesian inference\n and check all goodness-of-fit criteria, (3) how to make growth and reproduction predictions\n for untested time-variable exposure scenarios, (4) and finally the influence of both\n data quantity and design on the precision of parameter estimates.","PeriodicalId":21568,"journal":{"name":"ScienceOpen Posters","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceOpen Posters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPJ7LB5.V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) of chemicals is based on standard laboratory toxicity
tests with living organisms which ensure controlled experimental conditions and reproducibility.
These toxicity tests are usually carried out under constant exposure concentrations,
which can be far from reality of environmental exposure regimes as foreseen by the
practical use of chemicals. In that respect mechanistic effect modelling, such as
Toxicokinectic – Toxicodynamic (TKTD) modelling, has recently been playing an increasing
role in the extrapolation of effects from constant controlled exposure conditions
to time-variable exposure, closer to real environmental conditions. Among TKTD models,
models based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory adapted for ecotoxicology (DEB-TKTD
models) offer a comprehensive framework to analyse and extrapolate sublethal effects
(growth and reproduction) of chemicals on individual organisms across their whole
life cycle. While the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of TKTD effect
models (EFSA PPR, 2018. EFSA Journal;16(8):5377) considers DEB-TKTD models as valuable
tools for ERA, their full acceptance by stake-holders still requires the development
of standardized and user-friendly tools. To bridge this gap, we developed ready-to-use
functions within a new R package “rDEBtktd”. This package takes advantage of the general
Bayesian framework thus enabling the estimation of probability distributions for physiological
DEB parameters and TKTD parameters, from which uncertainties can be easily quantified
to be then propagated to forward-predictions for untested time-variable exposure scenarios.
The physiological part of the DEB-TKTD model we implemented follows the original definition
of the DEB model, which allows using the parameter values available for more than
1000 species in the Add-my-Pet database as prior information for the Bayesian inference
process. This poster illustrates: (1) how to simply simultaneously estimate all the
parameters of the DEB-TKTD model from one or several growth and reproduction datasets,
(2) how to produce informative summaries to assess the results of the Bayesian inference
and check all goodness-of-fit criteria, (3) how to make growth and reproduction predictions
for untested time-variable exposure scenarios, (4) and finally the influence of both
data quantity and design on the precision of parameter estimates. Environmental Risk
Assessment (ERA) of chemicals is based on standard laboratory toxicity tests with
living organisms which ensure controlled experimental conditions and reproducibility.
These toxicity tests are usually carried out under constant exposure concentrations,
which can be far from reality of environmental exposure regimes as foreseen by the
practical use of chemicals. In that respect mechanistic effect modelling, such as
Toxicokinectic – Toxicodynamic (TKTD) modelling, has recently been playing an increasing
role in the extrapolation of effects from constant controlled exposure conditions
to time-variable exposure, closer to real environmental conditions. Among TKTD models,
models based on the Dynamic Energy Budget theory adapted for ecotoxicology (DEB-TKTD
models) offer a comprehensive framework to analyse and extrapolate sublethal effects
(growth and reproduction) of chemicals on individual organisms across their whole
life cycle. While the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of TKTD effect
models (EFSA PPR, 2018. EFSA Journal;16(8):5377) considers DEB-TKTD models as valuable
tools for ERA, their full acceptance by stake-holders still requires the development
of standardized and user-friendly tools. To bridge this gap, we developed ready-to-use
functions within a new R package “rDEBtktd”. This package takes advantage of the general
Bayesian framework thus enabling the estimation of probability distributions for physiological
DEB parameters and TKTD parameters, from which uncertainties can be easily quantified
to be then propagated to forward-predictions for untested time-variable exposure scenarios.
The physiological part of the DEB-TKTD model we implemented follows the original definition
of the DEB model, which allows using the parameter values available for more than
1000 species in the Add-my-Pet database as prior information for the Bayesian inference
process. This poster illustrates: (1) how to simply simultaneously estimate all the
parameters of the DEB-TKTD model from one or several growth and reproduction datasets,
(2) how to produce informative summaries to assess the results of the Bayesian inference
and check all goodness-of-fit criteria, (3) how to make growth and reproduction predictions
for untested time-variable exposure scenarios, (4) and finally the influence of both
data quantity and design on the precision of parameter estimates.