Validating the highest performance standard of a test of academic literacy at a South African university

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
K. Sebolai, F. Stanford
{"title":"Validating the highest performance standard of a test of academic literacy at a South African university","authors":"K. Sebolai, F. Stanford","doi":"10.5785/36-2-885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poor graduation rates are a serious concern worldwide. In South Africa, this concern has escalated in the post-apartheid era wherein a democratic constitution has widened access to higher education for school-leavers. The socioeconomic and school backgrounds of the majority of these learners still hamper their timely completion at university. In order to combat this, local universities have implemented some necessary interventions. Such interventions are geared towards dealing with the academic language needs of incoming students. For the last two decades or so, standardised tests of academic language ability, now commonly known as academic literacy, have been used to determine these needs. Given the expected impact of these interventions on student completion rates, the importance of the validity of these tests cannot be overemphasised. The aim of this article is to investigate the validity of the highest performance standard set for one of the tests currently used to assess levels of academic literacy. Using 14 610 scores obtained on that test by first-year students at a South African university, in tandem with their average scores on completion of their first year, sensitivity and specificity statistics were computed to realise this aim. The results revealed that the performance standard investigated was valid 61% of the time.","PeriodicalId":43109,"journal":{"name":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5785/36-2-885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor graduation rates are a serious concern worldwide. In South Africa, this concern has escalated in the post-apartheid era wherein a democratic constitution has widened access to higher education for school-leavers. The socioeconomic and school backgrounds of the majority of these learners still hamper their timely completion at university. In order to combat this, local universities have implemented some necessary interventions. Such interventions are geared towards dealing with the academic language needs of incoming students. For the last two decades or so, standardised tests of academic language ability, now commonly known as academic literacy, have been used to determine these needs. Given the expected impact of these interventions on student completion rates, the importance of the validity of these tests cannot be overemphasised. The aim of this article is to investigate the validity of the highest performance standard set for one of the tests currently used to assess levels of academic literacy. Using 14 610 scores obtained on that test by first-year students at a South African university, in tandem with their average scores on completion of their first year, sensitivity and specificity statistics were computed to realise this aim. The results revealed that the performance standard investigated was valid 61% of the time.
验证南非一所大学学术素养测试的最高表现标准
低毕业率是全世界关注的一个严重问题。在南非,这种关切在后种族隔离时代升级,民主宪法扩大了高中毕业生接受高等教育的机会。这些学习者中的大多数人的社会经济和学校背景仍然阻碍他们及时完成大学学业。为了解决这个问题,地方大学已经实施了一些必要的干预措施。这些干预措施旨在满足新生的学术语言需求。在过去二十年左右的时间里,学术语言能力的标准化测试,现在通常被称为学术素养,被用来确定这些需求。考虑到这些干预措施对学生完成率的预期影响,这些测试有效性的重要性怎么强调都不为过。本文的目的是调查目前用于评估学术素养水平的测试之一的最高性能标准集的有效性。利用南非一所大学一年级学生在该测试中获得的14610分,以及他们完成第一年学业时的平均分数,计算了敏感性和特异性统计数据,以实现这一目标。结果表明,所研究的性能标准在61%的时间内有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning
Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信