Revisiting the staff to student ratio outcomes of the HOCS Survey 2018

Q4 Social Sciences
Ann E. Andrews
{"title":"Revisiting the staff to student ratio outcomes of the HOCS Survey 2018","authors":"Ann E. Andrews","doi":"10.30688/janzssa.2019.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reporting on the data for Q.25 of the ANZSSA Heads of Counselling Services HOCS Benchmarking Survey 2018 Summary Report as published in JANZSSA April Issue 1 2019 needs and deserves clarification. This article provides that clarification, some critical wording correction and some additional comparative data to highlight with more specificity on how institutions responding to the 2018 HOCS Survey either met or did not, meet, criteria to satisfy the international and national best practice standards for FTE staffing to enrolled student ratios for counselling services in post-secondary education. The institutional data identifies staffing levels and the number of students enrolled and does not identify responding institutions by name. Based on the HOCS survey returns it is concluded that none of the institutions met the international best practice standards for staffing FTE to enrolled student ratio of 1 to 1,000-1,500 and very few institutions achieved the ANZSSA best practice standard of 1 to 3,000.","PeriodicalId":39085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30688/janzssa.2019.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reporting on the data for Q.25 of the ANZSSA Heads of Counselling Services HOCS Benchmarking Survey 2018 Summary Report as published in JANZSSA April Issue 1 2019 needs and deserves clarification. This article provides that clarification, some critical wording correction and some additional comparative data to highlight with more specificity on how institutions responding to the 2018 HOCS Survey either met or did not, meet, criteria to satisfy the international and national best practice standards for FTE staffing to enrolled student ratios for counselling services in post-secondary education. The institutional data identifies staffing levels and the number of students enrolled and does not identify responding institutions by name. Based on the HOCS survey returns it is concluded that none of the institutions met the international best practice standards for staffing FTE to enrolled student ratio of 1 to 1,000-1,500 and very few institutions achieved the ANZSSA best practice standard of 1 to 3,000.
回顾2018年居屋服务调查的教职员与学生比例结果
关于ANZSSA咨询服务负责人HOCS基准调查2018年总结报告第25题数据的报告发布在JANZSSA 2019年4月第1期上,需要并且值得澄清。本文提供了澄清,一些关键的措辞更正和一些额外的比较数据,以更具体地强调院校如何回应2018年的HOCS调查,达到或不达到国际和国家最佳实践标准,以满足专上教育咨询服务的全职员工与注册学生比例的标准。这些机构的数据表明了人员配备水平和在校生人数,但没有指明作出回应的机构的名称。根据HOCS的调查结果,结论是没有一所院校达到国际最佳做法标准,即全职员工与在校生的比例为1比1000 - 1500,很少有院校达到ANZSSA的最佳做法标准,即1比3000。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信