Reduced shoulder proprioception due to fatigue after repeated handball throws and evaluation of test-retest reliability of a clinical shoulder joint position test.

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Agribusiness Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-15 DOI:10.1177/17585732221139795
Peter Sutton, Marie Lund Ohlsson, Ulrik Röijezon
{"title":"Reduced shoulder proprioception due to fatigue after repeated handball throws and evaluation of test-retest reliability of a clinical shoulder joint position test.","authors":"Peter Sutton, Marie Lund Ohlsson, Ulrik Röijezon","doi":"10.1177/17585732221139795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proprioception is vital for motor control and can be disturbed, for example, due to fatigue or injury. Clinical feasible, reliable and valid tests of shoulder proprioception are warranted. The aim was to investigate the effects of local fatigue on shoulder proprioception and the reliability of a feasible joint position sense test using an experimental repeated measures design.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty participants repeated a shoulder joint position sense test to assess test-retest reliability. The test was then utilized on a subgroup of handball players who were subjected to five bouts of a repeated throwing task with the dominant hand. The effect of local fatigue was investigated by comparing the fatigued with the non-fatigued shoulder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant interaction for the arm × bout (<i>p</i> = 0.028, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = 0.20) and a significant effect for the arm (<i>p</i> = 0.034, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = 0.35) with a significant decrease in joint position sense for the throwing arm compared to the non-throwing arm. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78 (95% CI = [0.57; 0.89]). The standard error of measurement between trials was 0.70° (range: 0.57°-0.90°).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results indicate that repeated throwing to fatigue disturbs shoulder joint position sense. Assessment with the modified test showed acceptable reliability and can be a valuable assessment tool in the clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":55544,"journal":{"name":"Agribusiness","volume":"21 1","pages":"100-109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10901175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agribusiness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732221139795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proprioception is vital for motor control and can be disturbed, for example, due to fatigue or injury. Clinical feasible, reliable and valid tests of shoulder proprioception are warranted. The aim was to investigate the effects of local fatigue on shoulder proprioception and the reliability of a feasible joint position sense test using an experimental repeated measures design.

Method: Forty participants repeated a shoulder joint position sense test to assess test-retest reliability. The test was then utilized on a subgroup of handball players who were subjected to five bouts of a repeated throwing task with the dominant hand. The effect of local fatigue was investigated by comparing the fatigued with the non-fatigued shoulder.

Results: There was a significant interaction for the arm × bout (p = 0.028, ηp2 = 0.20) and a significant effect for the arm (p = 0.034, ηp2 = 0.35) with a significant decrease in joint position sense for the throwing arm compared to the non-throwing arm. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78 (95% CI = [0.57; 0.89]). The standard error of measurement between trials was 0.70° (range: 0.57°-0.90°).

Discussion: The results indicate that repeated throwing to fatigue disturbs shoulder joint position sense. Assessment with the modified test showed acceptable reliability and can be a valuable assessment tool in the clinic.

反复投掷手球后因疲劳导致的肩部本体感觉减弱,以及对临床肩关节位置测试的重复测试可靠性进行评估。
背景:本体感觉对运动控制至关重要,但可能因疲劳或受伤等原因而受到干扰。临床上需要对肩部本体感觉进行可行、可靠和有效的测试。本研究旨在通过实验性重复测量设计,研究局部疲劳对肩部本体感觉的影响以及可行的关节位置感测试的可靠性:方法:40 名参与者重复进行肩关节位置感测试,以评估测试重复可靠性。然后在手球运动员分组中使用该测试,让他们用优势手进行五次重复投掷任务。通过比较疲劳和非疲劳肩部,研究了局部疲劳的影响:结果:与非投掷手臂相比,投掷手臂的关节位置感明显下降,手臂×回合存在明显的交互作用(p = 0.028,ηp2 = 0.20),手臂存在明显的效应(p = 0.034,ηp2 = 0.35)。类内相关系数为 0.78 (95% CI = [0.57; 0.89])。试验之间的测量标准误差为 0.70°(范围:0.57°-0.90°):讨论:研究结果表明,反复投掷致疲劳会干扰肩关节位置感。讨论:结果表明,疲劳状态下的反复投掷会干扰肩关节位置感,而改良测试的评估结果显示其可靠性是可以接受的,可以作为临床上一种有价值的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agribusiness
Agribusiness 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Agribusiness: An International Journal publishes research that improves our understanding of how food systems work, how they are evolving, and how public and/or private actions affect the performance of the global agro-industrial complex. The journal focuses on the application of economic analysis to the organization and performance of firms and markets in industrial food systems. Subject matter areas include supply and demand analysis, industrial organization analysis, price and trade analysis, marketing, finance, and public policy analysis. International, cross-country comparative, and within-country studies are welcome. To facilitate research the journal’s Forum section, on an intermittent basis, offers commentary and reports on business policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信