The Criticism Concept of Arabic Poetry in Ibn Qutaibah and Ibn Sallam Al-Jumahi Perspectives

NDR. Ayu Nurdiana, Tatik Mariyatut Tasnimah, Ghazali Zainuddin, Moh. Wakhid Hidayat
{"title":"The Criticism Concept of Arabic Poetry in Ibn Qutaibah and Ibn Sallam Al-Jumahi Perspectives","authors":"NDR. Ayu Nurdiana, Tatik Mariyatut Tasnimah, Ghazali Zainuddin, Moh. Wakhid Hidayat","doi":"10.17509/alsuniyat.v6i1.54648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare with the analysis of the thoughts of Ibn Qutaiba and Ibn Sallam Al-Jumahi in Literary Criticism. The research methodology involves a qualitative analysis of the writings of Ibn Qutaibah and Ibn Sallam Al-Jumahi. The historical and cultural context in which these two scholars were writing is also considered in order to better understand their views on poetry criticism and how they reflect broader trends in Arabic literature. The data obtained are from books by the two critics, Al-Shi'r wa Al-Shu'ara and Tabaqat Fuhul As-Shu'ara. By comparing the two thoughts, the results of this study reveal that both Ibn Qutaibah and Ibn Sallam Al-Jumahi had similar criteria for evaluating poetry but differed in their emphasis on certain aspects of poetic form and content. Ibn Qutaibah concludes his assessment of the identity of poetry because his criticisms by looking at the suitability of its 'Arudh and Qafiyah. Meanwhile, Al-Jumahi criticizes the legitimacy of poems by revealing the identity of the poem its poet to see the originality or from which tribe (region) the poem originates.","PeriodicalId":34521,"journal":{"name":"ALSUNIYAT","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALSUNIYAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17509/alsuniyat.v6i1.54648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to compare with the analysis of the thoughts of Ibn Qutaiba and Ibn Sallam Al-Jumahi in Literary Criticism. The research methodology involves a qualitative analysis of the writings of Ibn Qutaibah and Ibn Sallam Al-Jumahi. The historical and cultural context in which these two scholars were writing is also considered in order to better understand their views on poetry criticism and how they reflect broader trends in Arabic literature. The data obtained are from books by the two critics, Al-Shi'r wa Al-Shu'ara and Tabaqat Fuhul As-Shu'ara. By comparing the two thoughts, the results of this study reveal that both Ibn Qutaibah and Ibn Sallam Al-Jumahi had similar criteria for evaluating poetry but differed in their emphasis on certain aspects of poetic form and content. Ibn Qutaibah concludes his assessment of the identity of poetry because his criticisms by looking at the suitability of its 'Arudh and Qafiyah. Meanwhile, Al-Jumahi criticizes the legitimacy of poems by revealing the identity of the poem its poet to see the originality or from which tribe (region) the poem originates.
伊本·奎泰巴和伊本·萨拉姆·朱马希视角下的阿拉伯诗歌批评观
本研究旨在与对伊本·库泰巴和伊本·萨拉姆·朱马希的文学批评思想的分析进行比较。研究方法包括对Ibn Qutaibah和Ibn salam Al-Jumahi著作的定性分析。这两位学者写作的历史和文化背景也被考虑在内,以便更好地理解他们对诗歌批评的看法,以及他们如何反映阿拉伯文学中更广泛的趋势。所获得的资料来自两位评论家Al-Shi'r wa Al-Shu'ara和Tabaqat Fuhul As-Shu'ara的著作。通过对这两种思想的比较,本研究的结果表明,伊本·古泰拜和伊本·萨拉姆·朱马希对诗歌的评价标准相似,但对诗歌形式和内容的某些方面的重视有所不同。Ibn Qutaibah总结了他对诗歌身份的评价,因为他的批评着眼于Arudh和Qafiyah的适用性。同时,Al-Jumahi通过揭示诗歌诗人的身份来批判诗歌的合法性,以了解诗歌的原创性或来自哪个部落(地区)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信