Physicians’ Perception and Practice of Prescribing Vitamin B Combination versus Antiepileptic Drugs for Diabetic Neuropathy: Content Validity, Reliability and Pilot Study
{"title":"Physicians’ Perception and Practice of Prescribing Vitamin B Combination versus Antiepileptic Drugs for Diabetic Neuropathy: Content Validity, Reliability and Pilot Study","authors":"Narmin Essa, M. Aladul","doi":"10.31351/vol32iss1pp202-218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is the most common complication of diabetes mellitus causing increased morbidity and mortality. Although international guidelines did not include vitamins and dietary supplements in any line of management, these agents were prescribed by a significant number of physicians either as preventive or treatment of DN. This study aimed to develop a validated questionnaire that examines the physicians’ perception and practice towards prescribing vitamins or dietary supplements for DN treatment. \nMethod: The questionnaire was developed upon literature review via PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The questionnaire was revised upon experts’ views and opinions. The constructed questionnaire was validated by the means of content validity and internal consistency. Finally, the developed questionnaire was piloted in a small representative sample of the original future aimed research target population, to test its applicability and feasibility. \nResults: A total of 19 items questionnaire were developed in two domains (perception and practice). Content validity analysis results met a satisfactory level, in which the S-CVI/UA value was 0.84 and 0.89 for clarity and relevance respectively. The questionnaire also showed good reliability, in which the Cronbach’s alphas was 0.824. \nConclusion: This study showed the ability to construct a questionnaire with good levels of content validity and reliability that can cover different aspects of the current state of perception and practice among physicians regarding the management of DN.","PeriodicalId":14509,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences ( P-ISSN: 1683 - 3597 , E-ISSN : 2521 - 3512)","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences ( P-ISSN: 1683 - 3597 , E-ISSN : 2521 - 3512)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31351/vol32iss1pp202-218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is the most common complication of diabetes mellitus causing increased morbidity and mortality. Although international guidelines did not include vitamins and dietary supplements in any line of management, these agents were prescribed by a significant number of physicians either as preventive or treatment of DN. This study aimed to develop a validated questionnaire that examines the physicians’ perception and practice towards prescribing vitamins or dietary supplements for DN treatment.
Method: The questionnaire was developed upon literature review via PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The questionnaire was revised upon experts’ views and opinions. The constructed questionnaire was validated by the means of content validity and internal consistency. Finally, the developed questionnaire was piloted in a small representative sample of the original future aimed research target population, to test its applicability and feasibility.
Results: A total of 19 items questionnaire were developed in two domains (perception and practice). Content validity analysis results met a satisfactory level, in which the S-CVI/UA value was 0.84 and 0.89 for clarity and relevance respectively. The questionnaire also showed good reliability, in which the Cronbach’s alphas was 0.824.
Conclusion: This study showed the ability to construct a questionnaire with good levels of content validity and reliability that can cover different aspects of the current state of perception and practice among physicians regarding the management of DN.
背景:糖尿病性神经病变(DN)是糖尿病最常见的并发症,发病率和死亡率增高。尽管国际指南没有将维生素和膳食补充剂纳入任何管理范畴,但相当多的医生将这些药物作为DN的预防或治疗处方。本研究旨在制定一份有效的问卷调查,以检查医生对处方维生素或膳食补充剂治疗DN的看法和做法。方法:通过PubMed、Medline、Web of Science、Scopus、谷歌Scholar等网站的文献综述,编制问卷。根据专家的意见和意见对问卷进行了修订。通过内容效度和内部一致性对构建的问卷进行验证。最后,开发的问卷在原来的未来研究目标人群的一个小代表性样本中进行试点,以测试其适用性和可行性。结果:共编制了认知和实践两个领域的19项问卷。内容效度分析结果令人满意,清晰度和相关性的S-CVI/UA值分别为0.84和0.89。问卷的信度也很好,Cronbach 's alpha为0.824。结论:本研究能够构建具有良好内容效度和信度的问卷,涵盖医生对DN管理的认知和实践现状的不同方面。