Responsivity to Interviewer during Interview-Based Assessment of Physical Intimate Partner Violence.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1037/vio0000482
Emily Taverna, Yunying Le, Steffany J Fredman, Jacqueline A Mogle, Melanie S Fischer, Donald H Baucom, Amy D Marshall
{"title":"Responsivity to Interviewer during Interview-Based Assessment of Physical Intimate Partner Violence.","authors":"Emily Taverna, Yunying Le, Steffany J Fredman, Jacqueline A Mogle, Melanie S Fischer, Donald H Baucom, Amy D Marshall","doi":"10.1037/vio0000482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Interview assessments of intimate partner violence (IPV) may provide more accurate behavior frequency estimates than self-report questionnaires. However, concerns have been raised about whether participants underreport IPV during interviews due to an emotional response to the interviewer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 42 mixed gender community couples (83 individuals) in which at least one partner endorsed physical IPV perpetration or victimization in their relationship. We examined whether participants were emotionally responsive to the interviewer during an interview about physical IPV. Responsivity was defined as the extent to which participants' emotional arousal, indexed by vocal fundamental frequency (f<sub>0</sub>), was predicted by interviewers' emotional arousal at the previous talk turn on a moment-by-moment basis. We then examined whether participants' responsivity predicted interview-based reporting of IPV relative to their own self-report on an IPV measure and to the highest other available report (including partner report).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measures actor-partner interdependence models conducted in a multi-level modeling framework indicated that, on average, participants were responsive to interviewers' emotional arousal, even when controlling for responsivity to their own arousal, and that responsivity varied across participants. However, participants' responsivity to interviewer arousal did not significantly predict reporting of IPV perpetration or victimization during the interview relative to their own self-report or to the highest other available report.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants are emotionally responsive to interviewer arousal, but this responsivity does not appear to reduce interview-based reporting of IPV relative to self-report, supporting the utility of IPV interviews in clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Interview assessments of intimate partner violence (IPV) may provide more accurate behavior frequency estimates than self-report questionnaires. However, concerns have been raised about whether participants underreport IPV during interviews due to an emotional response to the interviewer.

Method: Participants were 42 mixed gender community couples (83 individuals) in which at least one partner endorsed physical IPV perpetration or victimization in their relationship. We examined whether participants were emotionally responsive to the interviewer during an interview about physical IPV. Responsivity was defined as the extent to which participants' emotional arousal, indexed by vocal fundamental frequency (f0), was predicted by interviewers' emotional arousal at the previous talk turn on a moment-by-moment basis. We then examined whether participants' responsivity predicted interview-based reporting of IPV relative to their own self-report on an IPV measure and to the highest other available report (including partner report).

Results: Repeated measures actor-partner interdependence models conducted in a multi-level modeling framework indicated that, on average, participants were responsive to interviewers' emotional arousal, even when controlling for responsivity to their own arousal, and that responsivity varied across participants. However, participants' responsivity to interviewer arousal did not significantly predict reporting of IPV perpetration or victimization during the interview relative to their own self-report or to the highest other available report.

Conclusions: Participants are emotionally responsive to interviewer arousal, but this responsivity does not appear to reduce interview-based reporting of IPV relative to self-report, supporting the utility of IPV interviews in clinical and research settings.

在以访谈为基础的亲密伴侣人身暴力评估过程中对访谈者的反应。
目的:对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的访谈评估可能比自我报告问卷能提供更准确的行为频率估计。然而,有人担心受试者在访谈中是否会因为对访谈者的情绪反应而少报 IPV:参与者为 42 对男女混杂的社区夫妇(83 人),其中至少有一方认可在他们的关系中存在身体上的 IPV 行为或受害情况。我们研究了参与者在关于身体 IPV 的访谈中是否对访谈者做出了情感反应。反应性被定义为参与者的情绪唤醒程度(以声带基频(f0)为指标)与访谈者在上一轮谈话中的情绪唤醒程度在逐时基础上的预测程度。然后,我们研究了参与者的反应性是否能预测基于访谈的 IPV 报告与他们自己对 IPV 测量的自我报告以及其他可用的最高报告(包括伴侣报告)之间的关系:在多层次建模框架下建立的重复测量行为主体-伴侣相互依赖模型表明,平均而言,参与者对访谈者的情绪唤醒反应灵敏,即使控制了对自身情绪唤醒的反应灵敏度,不同参与者的反应灵敏度也不尽相同。然而,相对于受试者的自我报告或其他最高级别的报告,受试者在访谈中对访谈者唤醒情绪的反应并不能显著预测受试者对 IPV 施暴或受害的报告:结论:参与者对访谈者的唤醒有情绪反应,但相对于自我报告而言,这种反应性似乎不会减少基于访谈的 IPV 报告,这支持了 IPV 访谈在临床和研究环境中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信