Analysis of the 2019’s National Physics Exam Questions Using the Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problem

M. Qaddafi, M. Ikbal, Rahmi Indah Sari
{"title":"Analysis of the 2019’s National Physics Exam Questions Using the Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problem","authors":"M. Qaddafi, M. Ikbal, Rahmi Indah Sari","doi":"10.29303/jpft.v8i1.2634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims at describing the composition of the cognitive system within the national exams of high school physics questions in 2019. The theoretical framework applied in analysing the exam refers to Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problem (TIPP). Then, this study applies a quantitative descriptive design by conducting document analysis towards the aforementioned exam, which consists of 40 item questions. Interestingly, the findings indicate that the analysed questions have be designed based on the TIPP principles, referring to the categories of remembering, understanding, analysing, and utilising knowledge with 3, 2, 15, and 20 questions respectively. It indicates that the questions for each category are not evenly distributed as the categories of remembering and understanding have lower number questions compared to others. Such evidence could truly become essential insights for the national exam question development team to consider the portion comparison of the question items for the four categories within TIPP.","PeriodicalId":34735,"journal":{"name":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","volume":"19 811 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v8i1.2634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aims at describing the composition of the cognitive system within the national exams of high school physics questions in 2019. The theoretical framework applied in analysing the exam refers to Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problem (TIPP). Then, this study applies a quantitative descriptive design by conducting document analysis towards the aforementioned exam, which consists of 40 item questions. Interestingly, the findings indicate that the analysed questions have be designed based on the TIPP principles, referring to the categories of remembering, understanding, analysing, and utilising knowledge with 3, 2, 15, and 20 questions respectively. It indicates that the questions for each category are not evenly distributed as the categories of remembering and understanding have lower number questions compared to others. Such evidence could truly become essential insights for the national exam question development team to consider the portion comparison of the question items for the four categories within TIPP.
用物理入门题分类分析2019年全国物理考试试题
该研究旨在描述2019年全国高中物理考试中认知系统的组成。分析考试的理论框架参考了《物理入门问题分类》(TIPP)。然后,本研究采用定量描述设计,对上述考试进行文献分析,该考试由40个题项组成。有趣的是,研究结果表明,分析的问题是根据TIPP原则设计的,分别参考了3、2、15和20个问题的记忆、理解、分析和利用知识的类别。这表明每个类别的问题分布不均匀,因为记忆和理解类别的问题数量比其他类别少。这些证据可以真正成为国家考题开发团队在TIPP中考虑四类题项比例比较的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信