Health status, healthcare, and access in children with long-term medication use and difficulties with emotion, concentration, and behavior.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING
Yuyin Yang, Beck L Reyes, E. Jacob
{"title":"Health status, healthcare, and access in children with long-term medication use and difficulties with emotion, concentration, and behavior.","authors":"Yuyin Yang, Beck L Reyes, E. Jacob","doi":"10.1111/jcap.12371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PROBLEM\nChildren with chronic conditions often have difficulties with emotions, concentration, and behaviors (ECB) and are not recognized and treated adequately. In this paper, long-term medication use (LTM) was adopted as a proxy for chronic illness due to the lack of consistent and standardized diagnostic criteria for chronic illnesses in children.\n\n\nMETHODS\nChildren (8-12 years) were selected from the California Health Interview Survey (2017) based on: (1) households with children (<12 years), (2) parent/adult caregivers report about child's health indicating \"yes\" to, (3) \"does your child require prescription medicine for a health condition that has lasted or is expected to last at least 12 months or more,\" and (4) \"difficulties with ECB in past 6 months.\"\n\n\nFINDINGS\nA total of 1600 children were included by the CHIS data set, and children whose parental report had met the selection criteria were children with LTM (n = 144; 7.4 ± 2.9 years), ECB (n = 233; 8.16 ± 2.14), and both LTM + ECB (n = 62; 8.61 ± 1.81). Children with LTM+ ECB were Caucasian (56.4%), Hispanic (19.3%), and males (64.5%). Children with both LTM + ECB had two to three (33.87%) or at least four (53.2%) physician visits, and/or receiving special therapy (45.1%). Children with LTM had prescription delays (n = 144; 5.6%) and were not able to get medical care due to lack of insurance (n = 144; 6.9%). The majority of the children with LTM (54.2%) and LTM + ECB (43.5%) had parental employment-based insurance. More children that have both LTM and ECB (48.4%) than children with LTM, No ECB (32.9%) were on Medi-Cal/Medicaid.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nChildren with LTM need further evaluation for difficulties with ECB. Future studies are required to examine health status, healthcare use, and access for children with LTM and ECB.","PeriodicalId":46587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PROBLEM Children with chronic conditions often have difficulties with emotions, concentration, and behaviors (ECB) and are not recognized and treated adequately. In this paper, long-term medication use (LTM) was adopted as a proxy for chronic illness due to the lack of consistent and standardized diagnostic criteria for chronic illnesses in children. METHODS Children (8-12 years) were selected from the California Health Interview Survey (2017) based on: (1) households with children (<12 years), (2) parent/adult caregivers report about child's health indicating "yes" to, (3) "does your child require prescription medicine for a health condition that has lasted or is expected to last at least 12 months or more," and (4) "difficulties with ECB in past 6 months." FINDINGS A total of 1600 children were included by the CHIS data set, and children whose parental report had met the selection criteria were children with LTM (n = 144; 7.4 ± 2.9 years), ECB (n = 233; 8.16 ± 2.14), and both LTM + ECB (n = 62; 8.61 ± 1.81). Children with LTM+ ECB were Caucasian (56.4%), Hispanic (19.3%), and males (64.5%). Children with both LTM + ECB had two to three (33.87%) or at least four (53.2%) physician visits, and/or receiving special therapy (45.1%). Children with LTM had prescription delays (n = 144; 5.6%) and were not able to get medical care due to lack of insurance (n = 144; 6.9%). The majority of the children with LTM (54.2%) and LTM + ECB (43.5%) had parental employment-based insurance. More children that have both LTM and ECB (48.4%) than children with LTM, No ECB (32.9%) were on Medi-Cal/Medicaid. CONCLUSION Children with LTM need further evaluation for difficulties with ECB. Future studies are required to examine health status, healthcare use, and access for children with LTM and ECB.
长期用药和情绪、注意力和行为困难儿童的健康状况、保健和可及性
问题:患有慢性疾病的儿童通常在情绪、注意力和行为(ECB)方面存在困难,并且没有得到充分的认识和治疗。由于缺乏一致和标准化的儿童慢性疾病诊断标准,本文采用长期用药(LTM)作为慢性疾病的替代指标。方法选取加州健康访谈调查(2017)中8-12岁的儿童(1)有儿童(<12岁)的家庭,(2)父母/成人照顾者对儿童健康状况的报告为“是”,(3)“您的孩子是否因持续或预计持续至少12个月或更长时间的健康状况而需要处方药?”以及(4)“过去6个月与欧洲央行的关系出现了困难。”CHIS数据集共纳入1600名儿童,父母报告符合选择标准的儿童为LTM儿童(n = 144;7.4±2.9年),欧洲央行(n = 233;8.16±2.14),LTM + ECB均为(n = 62;8.61±1.81)。LTM+ ECB患儿为白种人(56.4%)、西班牙裔(19.3%)和男性(64.5%)。患有LTM + ECB的儿童有2 - 3次(33.87%)或至少4次(53.2%)就诊,和/或接受特殊治疗(45.1%)。LTM患儿有处方延迟(n = 144;5.6%),由于缺乏保险而无法获得医疗服务(n = 144;6.9%)。大多数LTM患儿(54.2%)和LTM + ECB患儿(43.5%)有父母就业保险。同时有LTM和ECB的儿童(48.4%)比有LTM,没有ECB的儿童(32.9%)更多地参加了Medi-Cal/Medicaid。结论LTM患儿需要进一步评估ECB治疗的困难。未来的研究需要检查LTM和ECB儿童的健康状况、医疗保健使用和可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing (JCAPN) is the only nursing journal to focus exclusively on issues of child and adolescent mental health around the world. As a primary resource for nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinical practice, educator roles, and those conducting research in mental health and psychiatric care, the journal includes peer-reviewed, original articles from a wide range of contributors in a broad variety of settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信