Comparison and Evaluation of Fermentation Results of Probiotic Products by Acenobacter xylinum

K. Lestari, Floreta Fiska Yuliarni, L. Sa'diyah, Silviana Wulansari, Selvyronica Eka Agustine, Fatma Ariska Trisnawati, Silfiana Nisa Permatasari
{"title":"Comparison and Evaluation of Fermentation Results of Probiotic Products by Acenobacter xylinum","authors":"K. Lestari, Floreta Fiska Yuliarni, L. Sa'diyah, Silviana Wulansari, Selvyronica Eka Agustine, Fatma Ariska Trisnawati, Silfiana Nisa Permatasari","doi":"10.53342/pharmasci.v8i1.334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"products with Acetobacter xylinum starter included Nata and Kombucha. The large number of studies on probiotic product innovation should be followed by a survey on public acceptance of the products. This research aim to compare of the yield of probiotic products after fermentation process which was evaluated from a physical perspective, pH and public acceptance. This research is an experimental study to compared the fermented results of two types of probiotic products, nata and kombucha which are differentiated based on their raw ingredients. The nata products sample which had the largest thickness and weight of cellulose biofilm was NDC, while the kombucha products sample which had the largest thickness and weight of cellulose biofilm was KGF. pH of all samples, both nata and kombucha, decreased during the fermentation process. The samples of nata products that were most accepted by the panelists were NDC and NDM in terms of color, smell and taste. The samples of kombucha products that were most accepted by the panelists were KAF and KMF in terms of color, smell and taste.","PeriodicalId":17631,"journal":{"name":"Journal Pharmasci (Journal of Pharmacy and Science)","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Pharmasci (Journal of Pharmacy and Science)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53342/pharmasci.v8i1.334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

products with Acetobacter xylinum starter included Nata and Kombucha. The large number of studies on probiotic product innovation should be followed by a survey on public acceptance of the products. This research aim to compare of the yield of probiotic products after fermentation process which was evaluated from a physical perspective, pH and public acceptance. This research is an experimental study to compared the fermented results of two types of probiotic products, nata and kombucha which are differentiated based on their raw ingredients. The nata products sample which had the largest thickness and weight of cellulose biofilm was NDC, while the kombucha products sample which had the largest thickness and weight of cellulose biofilm was KGF. pH of all samples, both nata and kombucha, decreased during the fermentation process. The samples of nata products that were most accepted by the panelists were NDC and NDM in terms of color, smell and taste. The samples of kombucha products that were most accepted by the panelists were KAF and KMF in terms of color, smell and taste.
木酸杆菌发酵益生菌产品效果的比较与评价
含有木醋杆菌发酵剂的产品包括纳塔和康普茶。在对益生菌产品创新进行大量研究之后,应该对公众对产品的接受程度进行调查。本研究旨在比较发酵后益生菌产品的产率,从物理角度、pH值和公众接受度三个方面进行评价。本研究是一项实验研究,比较了根据原料区分的两种益生菌产品——纳塔和康普茶的发酵结果。纤维素生物膜厚度和重量最大的样品为NDC,而纤维素生物膜厚度和重量最大的样品为KGF。在发酵过程中,纳塔茶和康普茶的pH值均有所下降。在颜色、气味和味道方面,最被小组成员接受的样品是NDC和NDM。在颜色、气味和味道方面,最被小组成员接受的康普茶产品样品是KAF和KMF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信